"The fundamental problem is that we believed in something that was false. The false belief is that all racial groups are the same and the differences are trivial such as eye or skin color. But the reality is that race is biological and determines much more than appearance.
For example, black behavior and intelligence are much different from Whites, and it is not due to “culture.” Yes, there are exceptions, but exceptions don’t disprove the rule.
For 60 years we have been trying to make blacks into Whites, and it has not worked. It cannot work. And forcing Whites to live among black violence and dysfunction is immoral. Rich Whites don’t have this issue as they can move away from it and pretend blacks are like what they see on their TV shows. Poor Whites such as Shiloh Hendrix cannot escape the reality. This is why her reaction struck a chord with so many Americans." (RAMZPAUL)
If they cared about evidence, South Africa provides all that could ever be needed.
In a flash it will discredit the whole Potemkin Village. Raze it to the ground.
Zimbabwe is another.
But as with Vaxx-pushers, we are dealing with a cult of NPCs. RightThinking Stormtroopers who see us as the enemy.
They are immune to evidence. Even when they find themselves on the wrong side of a blade wielded by a specimen of cultural enrichment, they will pass from this life believing.
I shall advise the application of a different set of Words of Power, uttered by a very powerful man in reply to NPCs, Right-Thinking Stormtroopers and all the rest of the grisly posse: GO FUCK YOURSELVES!
South Africa is instructive in many ways, but as a counterpoint Botswana's homicide rate is about 10 per annum per 100,000 inhabitants, which is higher than the US average but a lot lower than the ADOS average. ADOS crime rates have also varied substantially over time (much lower in the 1950s, for example) so I don't think culture/environment have zero effect here.
And what are those numbers like if you are WHITE in South Africa? Culture very much does play a part. The culture in SA is anti-white as much as the culture's in China and Japan are xenophobic. The culture in American "hoods" is anti-education, antiwhite.
I'm not disagreeing with your comment per se (and I never claimed genetics had no influence on the picture), I just disagree with the notion that South Africa is the only possible outcome for a majority-black society.
They are less. Have always been less. There are always a few amazing examples, Thomas Sowell, Ben Carson, Walter E Williams. But that’s true in any group. Except Arabs. For some reason, they still live in the sixth century, and produce no geniuses. But, in general, they are less. They can’t succeed in civilized society. Even their sports heroes, after the money is gone, are still niggers. And why don’t we see gangs of roving white kids raping stores of their product, smashing things, hurting people for no other reason than that’s what they were born to do. So give them blue cities, put up walls, and let them kill each other. They haven’t been able to get past that 12% number in decades, despite the white guilt support.
"Inbreeding is surprisingly common in many Muslim nations and communities, evidence shows. About 40 percent of the population marries a cousin in Egypt, according to a 2016 report in The Economist, while the percentage in Jordan is 32 percent. “Rates are thought to be even higher in tribal countries such as Iraq and the Gulf states of Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Kuwait, ” says the Economist."
Even in 1863, the profession of African equality was performative. Lincoln issued his proclamation to look good to the Europeans because, at the time, the Union needed European support for its war against the breakaway Confederacy.
The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t free the slaves in the Union states, only in the Confederacy.
The first colony to legalize slavery was the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
The first legal slave owner in American history was a Black tobacco farmer named Anthony Johnson. The wording of the statement is important. Anthony Johnson was not the first slave owner in American history, but he was, according to historians, among the first to have his lifetime ownership of a servant legally sanctioned by a court.
American Indians owned thousands of Black slaves.
The census of 1830 lists 3,775 free Negroes who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.
Brutal Black-on-Black slavery has occurred in Africa for thousands of years.
Most slaves brought to America from Africa were purchased from Black slave owners.
Slavery is still happening in Africa, the Middle East, and many other places around the world.
Literally everyone practiced slavery, throughout history. Only whites have ended it. In the most recent cycle, blacks got the short end of the stick, getting enslaved by everyone (including themselves) because biology.
Lincoln caved to the politicians whose abolishition movement voters demanded it before the State volunteers could join the war. The 'cross of freedom' bluecoats 'marching off to war'. Such a great thing all those men died for our current fun times with a bunch of pavement apes.
Nature vs. Nurture is an interesting argument in all cases, but especially so in this one. What happens when a race or tribe's inherent nature is such that they cannot, and do not, properly nurture their own? They create a culture where that lack of any foundational nurture gets passed on from generation to generation, and they become so enamored of their own bullsh*t they literally believe the problem is due to racism from another race of people whose basic core values and default behaviors look like unreasonable supermax achievements they will never attain, even given the highest stack of boxes to stand upon and every last incentive conceivable to do so.
another question I have is how much has this faulty nurture mechanism that passes from generation to generation been contributed to by the welfare state. Post Civil War, freed slaves were quick to get married. 1950's rates of black single mothers was much lower than now. The permanent underclass may be as much a product of the welfare state as their "culture." Though it would be nice to see comparison studies to various African countries.
It's a good question. The line I hear most often (from those vocal enough to utter one, or the liberal simps hired to play Cyrano for them) is that the push for desegregation is Whitey's fault too because somehow "we" just wouldn't leave them alone to have their thriving communities independent from us. It's laughable, but that sort of grievance-industry standard-issue rhetoric is what many of them believe. In any case, desegregation was forced upon a White population that didn't want it, at gunpoint no less, and the ill-famed "White savior complex" is largely, in my estimation, a "bogeyman" construct for them to avoid having to face the ultimate failure of how meeting their demands for handouts has not improved their attitude, culture, or behavior as a demographic in the slightest.
The Tulsa Wall Street is another of the twisted tales we’ve been fed. A simple look at the pictures of the supposedly successful “Wall Street” are from before the fires in 1921. A lot of the cars in the pictures were manufactured after 1921.
There's a chain of events in the false reality imposed on us all. It began with equality for women, ramped up during the civil rights era and the imposition of no-fault (male-fault) divorce, which occurred in the 1960s, and has steadily advanced into obeisance toward any non-white now extending to the homosexual and trans-sexual community. When the military mandates tampons in the men's bathroom, it's obvious we are nearing peak insanity.
The entire west is seeing an explosion of anti-freedom initiatives. Where does it end? We already have the tribunals. Canada and Holland have a legal government killing apparatus. Does anyone think this will end well?
But the overwhelmingly dominant focus on female concerns and female thinking is a large part of how we got here. For at least some of the responsibility, look to the parents of Boomers - Boomers were too young to have had much influence on the beginnings of these trends.
It's ironic that a young lower-class single mom broke the rules. Maybe she wouldn't be in that position if it weren't for the actions of her great-grandmothers.
The 800-lb gorilla in the racial equality room is equality itself. The rot that's destroying the US is the direct result of worshiping this word. The masses have been brainwashed by self-appointed moral authorities to elevate it into a moral virtue. Here's the bottom line...
A society can have equality or quality, but it can't have both.
What does that mean?
It means that a society can be built on principles of meritocracy, or it can be built on principles of equality, but there is no way in the real world to have both simultaneously. Only in the idealistic, mental fantasy world of the left are they anything other than mutually exclusive.
It means that equality should never be used as the basis for personal or societal relationships. For at least 200 years, such attempts have been causing nothing but misery, chaos, and destruction. When applied to people, equality is an evil lie. When applied politically (such as the DEI equity agenda), the inevitable result is tyranny. Instead, a well functioning society should be concerned with reciprocity, mobility, meritocracy, consistency, accessibility, subsidiarity, and complementarity.
Words have implicit contexts. You don't use the word 'sexy' when talking about farm animals. In the same way, you shouldn't use the word 'equality' when talking about people. Equality is a theoretical concept that has meaning only in the context of math and physics. But today we have people that deliberately misuse words by reframing their effective context, especially 'equality'. These people are woke leftists, and all of them are insane. If you, dear reader, believe that equality is morality, then you're insane, too, and you can blame the current societal dystopia and any impending collapse on your own mistaken beliefs, all of which have rotten consequences.
Not all cultures are equal let alone the same and you are correct that the system has been pushing the idea for 2-3 generations now, that we are as interchangeable as Lego bricks in a set and that simply is not accurate.
I am biased naturally but I believe traditional American culture is the best all around culture. There are some like the Japanese who have better culture in some areas so this is about the culture as a whole.
The enemy of the American public that really must be dealt with first are teh various teacher unions and what too much of their union consist of today, #ToxicFeminist, wanna-be pedophiles and and varieties of non-heterosexual oddities. Until we get rid of them and install proper teachers we will continue to lose the culture war as the sane amongst us age out and replaced with woke crazies,
'For example, black behavior and intelligence are much different from Whites, and it is not due to “culture.”'
Yes and no. Culture is an outer instantiation of genetics in response to environment. Thus cultural customs and mores represent the congenital expressions of whatever ethnic group developed them at some specific locale. When transplanted to the US white environment, blacks developed some unique cultural byproducts (music, speech patterns, etc.) but none of it can disguise their basic genetic traits which clearly show through, and are similar to blacks everywhere in the world.
The most uncivilized shitfucks I've ever known were my poor white trash meth and fentanyl addicted Aunt and Uncle's family who lived in rural Missouri. And I lived in a very black area of East Cleveland for about 5 years where pretty much all my friends were poor and black. Never saw anything there approaching the level of idiocy and self-inflicted, unforced catastrophe that I saw in my own white family.
YMMV but my antecdotal personal experience doesn't support the position of this essay.
Anecdotes are anecdotes. I can't argue with your lived experience. However, the fundamental problem is the prohibition of *noticing*, especially noticing the statistics and thereby inferring causation. I honestly don't have a problem with individual blacks who behave in a civilized manner, although: I know a few middle-class blacks who, by all accounts, should be expected to (and do) behave reasonably, except: they are the very kinds of people who would support Karmelo Anthony and thereby aid and abet murder. If middle class blacks would hold their ghetto brethren accountable for the crimes they commit, then we could all more or less "get along". But they don't. Instead they enforce DEI, demand more gibs, and find every reason to increase the cognitive oppression of whites. It is for that reason that I no longer care about what happens to them. Even the ones I went to grad school and liked, back in those days.
The difference is that you can say White Trash. You can point out the patterns of bad behavior. You can say "Oh don't move to that neighborhood, it's full of meth heads."
It's not about all blacks being worse than all whites, it's about the taboo of Noticing.
I like his point. I had a similar thought. I’ve got some real downwardly mobile relatives in Windsor: throughly criminal. I know it’s at odds with our author and I think JC is right and courageous to say this out loud but I too often think about the fraught nature of race as a topic.
I would love to give this piece to 100 black people and then listen, listen carefully.
I grew up among the rural poor and have no illusions about them. To a large degree I think this degradation is due to unemployment and welfare. We did the same thing to the Native Americans, and yes, to the blacks.
No matter how noble the starting point, it is always possible, through poor breeding and moral degeneration, to bring a people low.
So you agree that black people become niggers because of their own crab bucket ghettos and not because they are genetically impure like some fuckwits in the comments state?
A conclusion on if the black person can grow good or not can't be reached if there's no incentive to grow good in the general population.
Right you are. That’s a component of my I idea about 100 black people reading this. I think they are heavily victimized by black crime and could well have some sympathy for JC’s argument. Of course the white liberals would no doubt be apoplectic, furious and unanimously against JC. They are reliably dull.
Well, you can't connect up chemical warfare (meth and fentanyl) with the destruction of people's souls and minds, so you probably should go back to commenting among the shiterati at Sam Harris's.
A word about Kyle Rittenhouse. I saw a clip of a group of seemingly educated blacks insisting that he had murdered 3 unarmed black demonstrators. True facts. They were all armed or trying to take his rifle, they had all been previously convicted of violent felonies AND they were all white. I bet you could get the same results from a group of AWFLs. Someone should try.
I had this same argument 2 years ago with an in-law. They literally got everything wrong about what happened. Why? Because they're from the D-M-V (MD) and hate guns and the 2nd amendment.
I wonder if the video of the Rodney King arrest is still around? I recall it as showing a very large, very nuts human being that was absorbing everything the cops could dish out, short of shooting him, and was still on his feat and fighting like, well, a dervish.
This above all else is exactly why Team Biden and Garland let Rittenhouse off the hook federally IMO. Too many people were learning what really happened and it was not worth keeping it in the headlines.
So they did try and charge him federally? I remember when the right took up mild celebrations. I thought that was because he had been acquitted on states charges?
That’s what I thought. And the reason I think they let him off the hook was due to optics. There’s still so many people who think Kyle greased 3 blacks at a BLM rally. And the left was prepared to keep it that way.
If the three monsters Rittenhouse ventilated HAD been black armed attackers and pedophiles, and all that was known to them, those "seemingly educated blacks" would have the exact same opinion. It is time for us to take our side and that seems to be happening.
Two at least, with two more nonwhites attacking (the guy who did the first running kick, and the one in the crowd near the dumpster that fired the first shot.)
Its Schrodinger's Race. African Black's are either victims or empowered peoples depending on which one best suites their needs at the time. Same with feminists.
Its effectively any group that is united in a cause like Muslim and Jews. Groups who when they come to a new place like America don't really merge with the existing culture adding to it some of their own but instead maintain their own culture within an isolated area. Jews are particular effective at this b/c they to this day use the Holocaust for special treatment. They are clever in how the operate where as Muslims are up front and in your face happy to tell you what they plain to do to you. And while this shouldn't be necessary inevitably someone, likely of Jewish ethnicity, will call me an anti-Semite b/c I don't praise Israel/Jews as good Americans are supposed to. So to be clear it is NOT-ALL-JEWS or all Muslims that act this way.
The last few generations of kids/teens have had their minds so poisoned about American History and White Europeans that its no wonder they hate themselves and actually believe the minorities are oppressed.
"Racism" was a term crafted in 1916 by Hirschfield and Trotsky, as a weapon against White society.
"Racism" teaches whites to despise their ancestry and be ashamed of their people. How is this seen as the highest of virtues?
Hirschfield, so he could collect victims for the first "transgender" clinic in Berlin (the one of the famous 'book burning' photo);
And Trotsky, so he could enslave Russia (and murder millions of Slavic Orthodox) to harvest timber and minerals for the New York banksters that funded him.
I cannot but resist an addendum: John Carter mentions the tree rings of white suburbs surrounding a rotted out urban core.
This is identical to the ring defense of Aryan villages that formed around the cities they had built, and lost. The "sons of heaven" who "looked upon the daughters of the earth [agriculture] and found them fair [pale]" were the half-black Gutian slaveraider ancestors of the Nosen we deal with today as creators of the "civil rights" movement.
They and their proxy armies of full-black "beast-men" brought down Mesopotamia, just as their HIAS migration racket is committing a mass swarm attack of White civilization today. Great Replacement of Whites is what they DO, it is their founding ethnos.
And why do they do this? Power, control and wealth. The clever humans with little to no morality use these kinds of psychological manipulations to get the masses to do as the elites desire even going so far as to get the masses to engage in self-harm which we are already seeing. In the past, this was kept somewhat in check until these same immoral people figured out that if they added feminism to the mix they could get better results as women and sexual access is the one thing that otherwise strong men will concede to.
Feminism is societal cancer and if it's not ended it will be used to end us as a society. Feminism is key and they know it.
One was a convicted child rapist as well. Others have made this point before but it's telling that a man can open fire in a leftist rally and hit three men, one of whom is a paedophile and another is violent towards women.
This seems like a good opportunity to plug Owen Benjamin. He was already ostracized because he spoke up against the trans kids narrative back when it was very taboo to do so. Then he refused to back off on the Word of Power - "How can the word Necrophilia be less offensive? That's the real N word." He said. He's been banned from countless media platforms and payment processors, all for refusing to stay silent on the Words (and ideas) of Power. He has a huge library of livestreams at unauthorized.tv, and he's on Bitchute too I believe. I've been a fan of his for years, so given the topic at hand, I figured a plug would be ok.
The NAACP is all over this because their power is at risk; the power to force whites to cower to them over this 1 word. It's not that different from slave owners who got upset when slaves spoke disrespectfully. Thanks to liberal academics, public school teachers, Hollywood and media in general, blacks have been constantly told all their life that they are victims who are but 5 minutes away rom being hunted down and killed by white's and yes many actually believe this.
if they let this woman get away with using forbidden knowledge , a word in this case, they fear a loss of power and control over what in America is the majority. Once whites stop being intimated by this, the black community fears they might start holding blacks who commit crimes , accountable for those crimes and I mean far more so then currently. Black sin America are %13 of the population and commit %52 of the violent crimes. Intimidating whites over this forbidden knowledge has helped keep accountability at a minimum. Should white's stop fearing this, they may start actually imprisoning every black violent criminal.
Nah, Americans are the descendents of the original settlers who ended up fighting the British and writing the constitution. Everyone who came after that isn't American, they're just USA citizens. I could buy citizenship, but I'd never be American.
before it was a welfare state, the people who came here were tough enough to make it which makes them Americans in my book. Nowadays, you're probably right.
"American" is a specific thing, that's why they have a constitution defining their people and rules. Anyone else who isn't in that constitution isn't American. They're "North American", but not American. The Cherokee aren't American, they're Cherokee living within the American empire. The Barbarians weren't Roman.
Technically I was wrong. I was referring to French and Spanish Americans who have been in America since the USA was founded, but the USA didn't incorporate the land they lived on until later. But I still think it makes little sense to not consider them Americans. Usually the qualifier "Old Stock" is used to single out settlers of the original 13 colonies, not to claim sole right to the title of American.
The French and Spaniards who settled around the Americas were colonists, and were ruled by France and Spain. The old stock Americans are different because they declared independence - big difference. Being the descendent of a colonist is a weird sort of purgatory - As a Canadian, that's the boat I'm in. We're still technically owned by the British crown - one reason why Canadians lack identity beyond "Not American".
I think the "America is an idea, Anyone can be American" ideas are propaganda word spells trying to delegitimize the notion of there being an actual American Nation.
For whatever reason, "race relations were better in the 90s" is one piece of internalized propoganda I can't quite shake. The Fresh Prince et al really did a number on Millennials.
Sounds like younger generations may not have that problem.
I realized today in reading the stories around this story, that actually even thinking the Word of Power is like being told to defecate in one's pants; it's the toilet training of racial noticing.
The Word of Power for whites is "Racist". To this day, the average pale face will be completely cowed by that word. Even the word Nazi is pretty much synonymous.
The establishment obviously feels that one Word is forbidden and the other justified.
I've been saying for a while that the r-word needs to become our word.
You can already see signs of this happening. On the left it is only ever used for whites, making it a racial slur. On the right it is used as an in-group identifier. The only remaining piece to fall into place is to savagely attack out group members who use it aggressively, and we're starting to see that happen too.
My take on the 90s Pax Belairia was that middle class whites started hanging out with small numbers of middle class blacks who were white-acting. We thought it was the End Of History (TM). The very next thing that happened was those white-acting blacks got attacked as race traitors.
Brilliant, John. It was so well-reasoned I just donated. The only other time I've contributed to a white person targeted for a racial "crime"/hitjob was Kyle Rittenhouse. What's up with the United States' upper Midwest, by the way?
Numerology generally is crackpottery, but the 80-year thing seems to have some evidence to support it. The Soviet Union, obviously, had that as a lifespan but it looks like Israel and the Anti-White Empire (to the degree the two are distinguishable) are about to go tits up, too, after an eighty-year run. Lies seem to have an expiry date.
You particularly nailed it here, and it is why I opened my wallet:
" But this is about more than helping Shiloh: it’s about breaking the taboo, stripping the word of its power, and setting our culture free."
I don't care if Shiloh engages in human sacrifice. The time to take our own side is now. Let's build on this.
I was raised on those Depression stories, my older brother and sister were born in the midst of it. (1935 and 36.) I think you have perfectly nailed the nature and reason for a 4 generation saeculum as the good times-bad times cycle. Outstanding.
TY, it originally came to my attention b/c all the Silent generation cohort in my family had deep pantries, maybe half a room or more devoted to canned & long term food, some of it quite old (as in, a couple decades past the 'best buy' date).
You only do that because you lived through a period when you couldn't get enough to eat.
I've never heard of regimes having an 80-year lifespan, but it's probably related to the adage, "Science advances one funeral at a time." In other words, maybe they die when all the people who founded them have died.
It isn't original to him, but former Israeli Ehud Barak recently expressed concern, and it is a fear widely shared there, that no Jewish kingdom/government ever lasted more than 80 years. That old, numerical superstition has gotten fresh attention as a result of him. There does seem to be something to it, and maybe it is due to the funerals you referenced.
The first time a bunch of European religious fanatics with state backing got the idea they could take over a chunk of the middle east was the first kingdom of Jerusalem which lasted about 88 years, so sounds about right. The various reboots were shorter lived.
If I recall correctly, the first spelling is a latinisation of the Arabic "khaffir" (or "kafir", I've seen it spelled that way too); unbeliever, also a slur close to the Arabic word for non-moslem Negros.
The second is from Boer/Dutch, meaning "louse" or "lice".
In Old Norse, Negros were called Blåmän (sing. Blåman). Blå = Blue, Män = Men. Bluemen.
Oh dear. Did I just turn Smurf into a racial slur?
Hm. Given the amount of contact between the Norse and their Bronze Age-ancestors, and the peoples of Ireland (and England - potentially even dating back to Doggerland) for several centuries, I wonder who inspired who to call them that.
Different from genetic archeology determining who had the gene for red hair and eyes the colour of the sea, this one is trickier.
Did "blå" mean the color we call "blue" in Old Norse? I seem to recall that color terms have shifted a bit, and that 'blue' may have originally meant a type of black.
If we translate it via Old Norse, yeah you could arrive at that meaning, though it would read:
"Negergrupp" - Negro-group
Fun factoid: When Miles Davis performed in Sweden for the first time, the tabloids gave rave reviews about "the gay Negro orchestra", which was considered very progressive language at the time.
My personal favorite is ''Porch Monkey'', which I unironically self-apply and schpread around whenever possible - mainly because it has no power in my world - and - CLERKS II RULES!! Hosting porch monkey jams on my front deck with cracker musicians - race isn't a focus at all or in the least - we play tunes by black and white artists with equal and mutual love, respect, and soul because that's really what it's all about. Guess I'm just a racist nigger Nazi whitie at heart having been ostracized by my own culture for not being sufficiently PC/WOKE, but hey, if you're after a little TRUTH AND SOUL where all these words and skin colors and posturing and hatred are just sociopolitical poopsmear, jam sesh at my place is where you'll find it..... You didn't read this. I was never here.
Why do you thing the left is pushing so hard & fast for mass immigration? It is to make native people of Western nations minorities sufficiently quickly so they can no longer muster a majority vote to say no. Once that threshold is gone democratic means will be exhausted and some kind of revolution will become necessary.
I do think a likely outcome in N. America is everyone self-segregating to the climates their ancestors evolved in and declaring new separate countries. The south will be black, the southwest Hispanic, and the north will be white.
And here we'd be, with popcorn popped over our woodstoves but no electric power to watch the reactions to the fleeing immivaders of the Catholics south of the border.
Great Dyeus. We had to flee to the most miserable climate on earth to get away from the Sun people. Just going outside can kill you, freezing to death.
This is one of the great fears of our social controllers. Their magic words lose their power.
What we call racism is really mild xenophobia; an innate and universal phenomenon. Only whites try to change this. It is xenophilia we must explain. This is not normal and must be educated into us.
The limits of xenophilia have now been reached. We are learning different cultures do not mix well, with one or two exceptions.
Alas anti-racism is now a religion along with climate catastrophe and feminism. The enemy of all this is not the white, racist, sexist man. Their enemy is reality. None of their philosophies work.
As for race, our future will be ethnic wars. It is the conflicts that will sweep away the last of the xenophilia and the associated elevation of magic words.
I agree. The superb organizational skills that will be brought to bear will assist. It needn't be bloody or protracted. It is a mental adjustment more than anything. Frankly, once the ladies start feeling threatened it is only a matter of time; that will override their manipulated nurturing instincts.
I suspect we are going to find out pretty soon. The right has lamented on violence or lack thereof from the left in 2024/25. I am under strong suspicion the reason it did not materialize is because the left traded its best shock troops (blacks) for illegal migrants.
The stories of loaded EBT cards and fancy hotel stays had to have done a number on the black population’s affair with the Dems. I suspect many of the evil brains on the left have figured this out now. They are desperately trying to make it happen now. Sorry of Metcalf and Shiloh will no doubt rile up their victim status.
I was against this initially as Trump seemed to be making headway early on. But now I say fuck it let’s get it on. Blacks only understand power imo and that will need to be demonstrated effectively.
I think it is less likely to be a confrontation rather than a dim awareness among the currently privileged groups their special status is waning. I think that will trigger panic.
Many groups look at what whites did to EACH OTHER during WW2 and pause for thought. At least the intelligent ones do. Why are we abusing this group etc.
We should all be like the little boy in that story, pointing out the truth in public when no one else will.
It gives others "permission" to tell the truth as well. That is the magic of it, and the reason that the corporate media and the Wikipedia are so ruthlessly censored.
Next we will notice everyone has noticed, even if they are not yet saying things out loud.
For those who despair, we must remember their approach is dependent on propaganda to paper over the cracks. Propaganda is expensive, and our resources cannot sustain it.
Yes I agree. We are forgetting how unnatural xenophilia actually is. As I outlined in that piece above, it must be specifically educated into us, and even then reality chips away at it.
This chipping away is accelerated by immigration as we come into close contact with people different from us.
I believe the future is a total reversal of the last thirty years. Energetic repatriation basically.
Sharp piece. Re-allowance of freedom of association would forestall the coming conflict after the propaganda totally fails, but those who matter are too constitutionally opposed to the idea to allow it. That likely is a good thing, too, given the acceleration of The Great Replacement. Reaching a head sooner than later helps us. We are at the outer limits of permissible sorting, fragmentation and self-segregation, and the inevitable confrontation indeed is close.
All good points. But I think Shilohgate represents exhaustion, with the collapse of the narrative as a consequence. No strategy, not even some tribal awareness for whites. More of a fuck-this moment. As those moments accumulate they become impossible to hide.
A corollary to this is the inevitable hysteria from the usual suspects, not the least of them the more privileged groups in Western nations. As Thomas Sowell reminds us, when you are used to preferential treatment then equal treatment can seem like prejudice. So something akin to a fuck off will seem all the more shocking. But we will be seeing much more of this and the hysteria of course.
Shiloh indeed had a spontaneous "fuck this" moment and I agree these will accelerate and are accelerating to the horror of the privileged. What I am watching is the widespread "fuck this" attitude of donors and supporters. This is where the change is most noticeable. Some of these types would have been joining a lynch mob against Shiloh not so long ago but also appear truly fed up and not merely opportunistic, though even the latter also represents rapid advancement.
I didn't earlier tie up this point, so I will now: just as people have found they will not be left alone, and even self-segregation--which is unavailable to people like Shiloh--has a hard limit, defensive actions will give way to confrontation by necessity. The erasure of preferential treatment is just the outer edge and we see outlines of related policy changes. Again, whether those are opportunistic/defensive is beside the point. They most likely will not forestall the regime's end, and the one that could, freedom of association, likely won't be on the table, but at least a segment of the ruling class sees the handwriting on the wall.
I agree some of our rulers are reading the tea leaves and getting nervous. I believe this aided the reelection of Trump. Nervousness. Let's placate the people we fear.
So I don't doubt some of them get it. But this is ultimately an existential fight. The smarter elites cannot really believe mass immigration was going to end well.
It is one of the things we forget about the online world. In among the six second videos, doomscrolling and porn it provides a means to connect with those on the same wavelength. A first in history. A kind of miracle we overlook too often. This is a source of strength and perhaps even a lifeline for some.
And let's not forget our lords and masters are none too capable. When the magic words do lose their power what then? I doubt they have a plan B given the comedy levels of ineptness of their plan A.
Regardless of anything else, Shiloh Hendrix is a mother with a small child. She is entitled to the security of her property and person as a matter of law. She is entitled to demand her rights and equally entitled to the concern and support of her fellow citizens, regardless of her race or theirs. Solidarity amongst Africans should not take priority over Shiloh Hendrix's wellbeing. The fact that it does reveals how rotten the civic nationalist project has become.
Furthermore, what possible moral authority does a Somali have in regard to a case like this? None that I can see.
The great weakness of the US is the lack of genuine loyalty, empathy or respect between classes. Upper class whites have developed a patron/client relationship with blacks and are forming alliances with any number of other POC from the Global South. All at the expense of sub-elite whites.
As for the issue of disrespect, amongst modern whites (above all transalpine ones) social status is downstream from compliance with behavioural norms and personal achievement. It is not downstream from ancestral status.
And the enforcement of coerced respect is a form of menace, which is criminal in itself. The fact that practically all blacks (and their allies) think that menace is OK and that disrespect (real or imagined) warrants abuse, even murder (as appears to be the case with Karmelo Anthony) reveals the true state of race relations.
This is one of the most accurate statements I've seen. Working class white people are basically the greatest losers from globalism and the Western elites are like those animals that eat their own young.
The problem is downstream from a range of factors. It is more than globalization.
Washington has been playing the black card for a long time. The Reconstruction era, then Civil Rights.
Globalization makes things more urgent, as elites seek allies overseas in order secure co-operation in trade and finance. The price for liberalising financial flows and trade is paid in migration. It is a quid pro quo. And we know who pays the price.
In terms of allies I meant more the alliances between the left & “client minorities” which are granted welfare and preferential treatment for their votes at the direct expense of the bottom-most native population. But the answer is still valid in your regard.
Man I am gutted - yesterday my country just voted for 3 more years of this crap.
Definitely. Deindustrialized client states larping as treasured allies. All three have chronic trade deficits financed by money laundering and capital flight. A shared obsession with real estate ponzi schemes to maintain illusions of prosperity. Also replacing their own people ASAP.
In a truly perverse irony the Crown in Parliament now serves to offer political and legal protection for Quislings. And the absurdity is compounded by the fact that we, of all people on the planet, should understand what is happening and how it is being done. The tools of control developed in the Raj, Malaya and Fiji are applied to us.
On the bright side, South Africa is crumbling, Canada faces renewed pressures for secession and the UK helotry are becoming inflammable. This will tax the skills of the networked, trans-continental, regime under which we live.
I don't fancy their chances, for precisely the reasons of internal instability you mention. Those tools were ultimately insufficient to hold onto colonial possessions. Domestic application also comes with a self-limiting expiry date.
Difference this time is they'll have nowhere to fall back to.
I understand. I voted early on Thursday. Appalling choices on the ballot. I expected that Dutton would win simply because he would do marginally less damage. Did not expect a strong win for Albanese.
At the moment I prefer not to think about the future...the Voice#2, migration, Green energy, Islam, civil liberties, taxes.
Fingers crossed: the Senate may, just may, dull the impact. Take it easy.
The entirety of the extra-US anglosphere is in a dark place right now. Given the propensity of our elites to cooperate on matters of policy, political tactics, narrative management, etc, I suspect games are afoot.
Am extremely worried about the convergence in policy. If Starmer doubles down on digital repression they may well target dissidents in the Old Dominions to make an example of them. The UK has publicly broached extraditing posters/publishers from overseas. London cannot extradite US citizens for posting dangerous or proscribed content, but there are no limits on what the authorities here will do if asked. And Canberra is already terrified by the internet and ready to go full Big Brother.
The legal system here has been crumbling for ages. At one stage they protected the reputation of a former foreign minister (Downer, who helped start the Russiagate stuff with a rumour he heard in a bar in London) by gaoling a whistleblower after a secret trial that led to his barrister, an ex attorney general, fleeing the country. This would once have been unthinkable. And key barristers specialising in civil rights have retired, one to France.
The US at least has Trump pushing back. We are exposed to the worst of it.
Not gonna lie though, seeing a four year old niglet stealing from a baby's bag had to be like witnessing a young chimp use tools for the first time...a moment of advent that shapes how the rest of their life will look and play out.
Does the word "nigger" cause problems with Substack, or does your exclusive use of "Word of Power" throughout the article stem from your own having still ingrained the taboo? It just seems weird to read an article about how "nigger" needs to lose its taboo that seems unwilling to use the word itself.
Thomas, before I can decide whether to be deeply offended by your use of the term "nigger," I have to know whether you are white or Asian, in which case I will be traumatized, or Black or Hispanic or Arab, in which case I will find your use of the term charming and brotherly (because no Blacks, Hispanics, or Arabs ever practiced slavery ever). So please identify your race, so I know whether I should be traumatized or feel lighthearted after reading your comment.
We're not all Americans, we're not a nation of immigrants, we're not an idea nation, we were not all born equal, discrimination and racism are good things, diversity is our weakness, tolerance is cowardice, there's no such thing as equality, etc.
"The fundamental problem is that we believed in something that was false. The false belief is that all racial groups are the same and the differences are trivial such as eye or skin color. But the reality is that race is biological and determines much more than appearance.
For example, black behavior and intelligence are much different from Whites, and it is not due to “culture.” Yes, there are exceptions, but exceptions don’t disprove the rule.
For 60 years we have been trying to make blacks into Whites, and it has not worked. It cannot work. And forcing Whites to live among black violence and dysfunction is immoral. Rich Whites don’t have this issue as they can move away from it and pretend blacks are like what they see on their TV shows. Poor Whites such as Shiloh Hendrix cannot escape the reality. This is why her reaction struck a chord with so many Americans." (RAMZPAUL)
Extremely well said.
Recently I came across this article from a poster over at Gab. It is an interesting read related to your article here, if you haven't seen it before.
Morality and Abstract Thinking – How Africans may differ from Westerners https://halcyoninitiative.wordpress.com/2014/10/05/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners-from-amren-com/
39 years of dominant black rule in South Africa PROVES it's more than just culture.
If they cared about evidence, South Africa provides all that could ever be needed.
In a flash it will discredit the whole Potemkin Village. Raze it to the ground.
Zimbabwe is another.
But as with Vaxx-pushers, we are dealing with a cult of NPCs. RightThinking Stormtroopers who see us as the enemy.
They are immune to evidence. Even when they find themselves on the wrong side of a blade wielded by a specimen of cultural enrichment, they will pass from this life believing.
That is some epically powerful mind control.
Peace.
Namibia under German rule and after independence.
I shall advise the application of a different set of Words of Power, uttered by a very powerful man in reply to NPCs, Right-Thinking Stormtroopers and all the rest of the grisly posse: GO FUCK YOURSELVES!
South Africa is instructive in many ways, but as a counterpoint Botswana's homicide rate is about 10 per annum per 100,000 inhabitants, which is higher than the US average but a lot lower than the ADOS average. ADOS crime rates have also varied substantially over time (much lower in the 1950s, for example) so I don't think culture/environment have zero effect here.
And what are those numbers like if you are WHITE in South Africa? Culture very much does play a part. The culture in SA is anti-white as much as the culture's in China and Japan are xenophobic. The culture in American "hoods" is anti-education, antiwhite.
I'm not disagreeing with your comment per se (and I never claimed genetics had no influence on the picture), I just disagree with the notion that South Africa is the only possible outcome for a majority-black society.
Indeed. Haiti is another possibility.
They are less. Have always been less. There are always a few amazing examples, Thomas Sowell, Ben Carson, Walter E Williams. But that’s true in any group. Except Arabs. For some reason, they still live in the sixth century, and produce no geniuses. But, in general, they are less. They can’t succeed in civilized society. Even their sports heroes, after the money is gone, are still niggers. And why don’t we see gangs of roving white kids raping stores of their product, smashing things, hurting people for no other reason than that’s what they were born to do. So give them blue cities, put up walls, and let them kill each other. They haven’t been able to get past that 12% number in decades, despite the white guilt support.
"For some reason, they still live in the sixth century, and produce no geniuses."
Begetting children on first cousins will ensure that, especially when it's done for tens of generations.
This is true.
"Inbreeding is surprisingly common in many Muslim nations and communities, evidence shows. About 40 percent of the population marries a cousin in Egypt, according to a 2016 report in The Economist, while the percentage in Jordan is 32 percent. “Rates are thought to be even higher in tribal countries such as Iraq and the Gulf states of Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Kuwait, ” says the Economist."
even celebrated Abraham Lincoln believed as much. Though I personally think its mostly cultural, which is even worse really.
Abraham Lincoln's first question after sobering up from a week long bender - "I freed who?"
"What's the best place to send them all to?"
Back to Africa.
Liberia. That's what it was created for.
Even in 1863, the profession of African equality was performative. Lincoln issued his proclamation to look good to the Europeans because, at the time, the Union needed European support for its war against the breakaway Confederacy.
Here’s a few inconvenient facts:
The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t free the slaves in the Union states, only in the Confederacy.
The first colony to legalize slavery was the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
The first legal slave owner in American history was a Black tobacco farmer named Anthony Johnson. The wording of the statement is important. Anthony Johnson was not the first slave owner in American history, but he was, according to historians, among the first to have his lifetime ownership of a servant legally sanctioned by a court.
American Indians owned thousands of Black slaves.
The census of 1830 lists 3,775 free Negroes who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.
Brutal Black-on-Black slavery has occurred in Africa for thousands of years.
Most slaves brought to America from Africa were purchased from Black slave owners.
Slavery is still happening in Africa, the Middle East, and many other places around the world.
Literally everyone practiced slavery, throughout history. Only whites have ended it. In the most recent cycle, blacks got the short end of the stick, getting enslaved by everyone (including themselves) because biology.
not biology...it was the only way to make them productive.
Lincoln caved to the politicians whose abolishition movement voters demanded it before the State volunteers could join the war. The 'cross of freedom' bluecoats 'marching off to war'. Such a great thing all those men died for our current fun times with a bunch of pavement apes.
Nature vs. Nurture is an interesting argument in all cases, but especially so in this one. What happens when a race or tribe's inherent nature is such that they cannot, and do not, properly nurture their own? They create a culture where that lack of any foundational nurture gets passed on from generation to generation, and they become so enamored of their own bullsh*t they literally believe the problem is due to racism from another race of people whose basic core values and default behaviors look like unreasonable supermax achievements they will never attain, even given the highest stack of boxes to stand upon and every last incentive conceivable to do so.
another question I have is how much has this faulty nurture mechanism that passes from generation to generation been contributed to by the welfare state. Post Civil War, freed slaves were quick to get married. 1950's rates of black single mothers was much lower than now. The permanent underclass may be as much a product of the welfare state as their "culture." Though it would be nice to see comparison studies to various African countries.
It's a good question. The line I hear most often (from those vocal enough to utter one, or the liberal simps hired to play Cyrano for them) is that the push for desegregation is Whitey's fault too because somehow "we" just wouldn't leave them alone to have their thriving communities independent from us. It's laughable, but that sort of grievance-industry standard-issue rhetoric is what many of them believe. In any case, desegregation was forced upon a White population that didn't want it, at gunpoint no less, and the ill-famed "White savior complex" is largely, in my estimation, a "bogeyman" construct for them to avoid having to face the ultimate failure of how meeting their demands for handouts has not improved their attitude, culture, or behavior as a demographic in the slightest.
subsidizing failure is the number one job of government, so this has been right up their alley.
The Tulsa Wall Street is another of the twisted tales we’ve been fed. A simple look at the pictures of the supposedly successful “Wall Street” are from before the fires in 1921. A lot of the cars in the pictures were manufactured after 1921.
There's a chain of events in the false reality imposed on us all. It began with equality for women, ramped up during the civil rights era and the imposition of no-fault (male-fault) divorce, which occurred in the 1960s, and has steadily advanced into obeisance toward any non-white now extending to the homosexual and trans-sexual community. When the military mandates tampons in the men's bathroom, it's obvious we are nearing peak insanity.
The entire west is seeing an explosion of anti-freedom initiatives. Where does it end? We already have the tribunals. Canada and Holland have a legal government killing apparatus. Does anyone think this will end well?
But the overwhelmingly dominant focus on female concerns and female thinking is a large part of how we got here. For at least some of the responsibility, look to the parents of Boomers - Boomers were too young to have had much influence on the beginnings of these trends.
It's ironic that a young lower-class single mom broke the rules. Maybe she wouldn't be in that position if it weren't for the actions of her great-grandmothers.
Absolutely true.
Turns out however that she isn't a single mom.
Not poor anymore.
The 800-lb gorilla in the racial equality room is equality itself. The rot that's destroying the US is the direct result of worshiping this word. The masses have been brainwashed by self-appointed moral authorities to elevate it into a moral virtue. Here's the bottom line...
A society can have equality or quality, but it can't have both.
What does that mean?
It means that a society can be built on principles of meritocracy, or it can be built on principles of equality, but there is no way in the real world to have both simultaneously. Only in the idealistic, mental fantasy world of the left are they anything other than mutually exclusive.
It means that equality should never be used as the basis for personal or societal relationships. For at least 200 years, such attempts have been causing nothing but misery, chaos, and destruction. When applied to people, equality is an evil lie. When applied politically (such as the DEI equity agenda), the inevitable result is tyranny. Instead, a well functioning society should be concerned with reciprocity, mobility, meritocracy, consistency, accessibility, subsidiarity, and complementarity.
Words have implicit contexts. You don't use the word 'sexy' when talking about farm animals. In the same way, you shouldn't use the word 'equality' when talking about people. Equality is a theoretical concept that has meaning only in the context of math and physics. But today we have people that deliberately misuse words by reframing their effective context, especially 'equality'. These people are woke leftists, and all of them are insane. If you, dear reader, believe that equality is morality, then you're insane, too, and you can blame the current societal dystopia and any impending collapse on your own mistaken beliefs, all of which have rotten consequences.
Not all cultures are equal let alone the same and you are correct that the system has been pushing the idea for 2-3 generations now, that we are as interchangeable as Lego bricks in a set and that simply is not accurate.
I am biased naturally but I believe traditional American culture is the best all around culture. There are some like the Japanese who have better culture in some areas so this is about the culture as a whole.
The enemy of the American public that really must be dealt with first are teh various teacher unions and what too much of their union consist of today, #ToxicFeminist, wanna-be pedophiles and and varieties of non-heterosexual oddities. Until we get rid of them and install proper teachers we will continue to lose the culture war as the sane amongst us age out and replaced with woke crazies,
'For example, black behavior and intelligence are much different from Whites, and it is not due to “culture.”'
Yes and no. Culture is an outer instantiation of genetics in response to environment. Thus cultural customs and mores represent the congenital expressions of whatever ethnic group developed them at some specific locale. When transplanted to the US white environment, blacks developed some unique cultural byproducts (music, speech patterns, etc.) but none of it can disguise their basic genetic traits which clearly show through, and are similar to blacks everywhere in the world.
LOL
The time of fear has passed.
Fuck these people. I’m done with uncivilized shitfucks telling us how to live.
It’s over.
It's time to have nice things again.
And we get the stars back.
The most uncivilized shitfucks I've ever known were my poor white trash meth and fentanyl addicted Aunt and Uncle's family who lived in rural Missouri. And I lived in a very black area of East Cleveland for about 5 years where pretty much all my friends were poor and black. Never saw anything there approaching the level of idiocy and self-inflicted, unforced catastrophe that I saw in my own white family.
YMMV but my antecdotal personal experience doesn't support the position of this essay.
Anecdotes are anecdotes. I can't argue with your lived experience. However, the fundamental problem is the prohibition of *noticing*, especially noticing the statistics and thereby inferring causation. I honestly don't have a problem with individual blacks who behave in a civilized manner, although: I know a few middle-class blacks who, by all accounts, should be expected to (and do) behave reasonably, except: they are the very kinds of people who would support Karmelo Anthony and thereby aid and abet murder. If middle class blacks would hold their ghetto brethren accountable for the crimes they commit, then we could all more or less "get along". But they don't. Instead they enforce DEI, demand more gibs, and find every reason to increase the cognitive oppression of whites. It is for that reason that I no longer care about what happens to them. Even the ones I went to grad school and liked, back in those days.
The difference is that you can say White Trash. You can point out the patterns of bad behavior. You can say "Oh don't move to that neighborhood, it's full of meth heads."
It's not about all blacks being worse than all whites, it's about the taboo of Noticing.
Congratulations, you're a shitfuck? I guess?
What's your point, boy?
I like his point. I had a similar thought. I’ve got some real downwardly mobile relatives in Windsor: throughly criminal. I know it’s at odds with our author and I think JC is right and courageous to say this out loud but I too often think about the fraught nature of race as a topic.
I would love to give this piece to 100 black people and then listen, listen carefully.
I grew up among the rural poor and have no illusions about them. To a large degree I think this degradation is due to unemployment and welfare. We did the same thing to the Native Americans, and yes, to the blacks.
No matter how noble the starting point, it is always possible, through poor breeding and moral degeneration, to bring a people low.
Low: well said.
So you agree that black people become niggers because of their own crab bucket ghettos and not because they are genetically impure like some fuckwits in the comments state?
A conclusion on if the black person can grow good or not can't be reached if there's no incentive to grow good in the general population.
I hope someone solves the unemployment problem before they axe welfare.
Perhaps white liberals would be a better option. That’s with whom it’ll come to blows.
Right you are. That’s a component of my I idea about 100 black people reading this. I think they are heavily victimized by black crime and could well have some sympathy for JC’s argument. Of course the white liberals would no doubt be apoplectic, furious and unanimously against JC. They are reliably dull.
Well, you can't connect up chemical warfare (meth and fentanyl) with the destruction of people's souls and minds, so you probably should go back to commenting among the shiterati at Sam Harris's.
Did Sam Harris have some take on the subject you find objectionable?
So basically "NAXALT! NAXALT!"
Had to look that up:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NAXALT
A word about Kyle Rittenhouse. I saw a clip of a group of seemingly educated blacks insisting that he had murdered 3 unarmed black demonstrators. True facts. They were all armed or trying to take his rifle, they had all been previously convicted of violent felonies AND they were all white. I bet you could get the same results from a group of AWFLs. Someone should try.
I had this exact conversation with a black guy on X a few weeks ago. They all seem to think this.
I had this same argument 2 years ago with an in-law. They literally got everything wrong about what happened. Why? Because they're from the D-M-V (MD) and hate guns and the 2nd amendment.
I wonder if the video of the Rodney King arrest is still around? I recall it as showing a very large, very nuts human being that was absorbing everything the cops could dish out, short of shooting him, and was still on his feat and fighting like, well, a dervish.
Be sure to get the whole video, not the clip the media showed over and over again.
This above all else is exactly why Team Biden and Garland let Rittenhouse off the hook federally IMO. Too many people were learning what really happened and it was not worth keeping it in the headlines.
They didn't let him off the hook federally. He was acquitted by a jury after seeing the evidence.
So they did try and charge him federally? I remember when the right took up mild celebrations. I thought that was because he had been acquitted on states charges?
The Feds did not charge him seperately, as they like to do.
Plus, I don't think Garfinkle wanted to draw attention to the ethnicity of Kyle's (((white))) attackers.
That’s what I thought. And the reason I think they let him off the hook was due to optics. There’s still so many people who think Kyle greased 3 blacks at a BLM rally. And the left was prepared to keep it that way.
If the three monsters Rittenhouse ventilated HAD been black armed attackers and pedophiles, and all that was known to them, those "seemingly educated blacks" would have the exact same opinion. It is time for us to take our side and that seems to be happening.
Agreed, we've been forced into this un-Anglo response, so be it, the blacks are going to wish they'd kept their fucking heads down.
They weren't all White. At least one was jewish.
Actually Rosenbaum, despite that being a very common Jewish name, was not Jewish.
Two at least, with two more nonwhites attacking (the guy who did the first running kick, and the one in the crowd near the dumpster that fired the first shot.)
the blacks always make themselves the victim...it actually speaks volumes
Its Schrodinger's Race. African Black's are either victims or empowered peoples depending on which one best suites their needs at the time. Same with feminists.
Same with Jews, same with many other ethnicities. Why? Because it works on idealistic, guilt-ridden whites.
Its effectively any group that is united in a cause like Muslim and Jews. Groups who when they come to a new place like America don't really merge with the existing culture adding to it some of their own but instead maintain their own culture within an isolated area. Jews are particular effective at this b/c they to this day use the Holocaust for special treatment. They are clever in how the operate where as Muslims are up front and in your face happy to tell you what they plain to do to you. And while this shouldn't be necessary inevitably someone, likely of Jewish ethnicity, will call me an anti-Semite b/c I don't praise Israel/Jews as good Americans are supposed to. So to be clear it is NOT-ALL-JEWS or all Muslims that act this way.
The last few generations of kids/teens have had their minds so poisoned about American History and White Europeans that its no wonder they hate themselves and actually believe the minorities are oppressed.
"Racism" was a term crafted in 1916 by Hirschfield and Trotsky, as a weapon against White society.
"Racism" teaches whites to despise their ancestry and be ashamed of their people. How is this seen as the highest of virtues?
Hirschfield, so he could collect victims for the first "transgender" clinic in Berlin (the one of the famous 'book burning' photo);
And Trotsky, so he could enslave Russia (and murder millions of Slavic Orthodox) to harvest timber and minerals for the New York banksters that funded him.
I cannot but resist an addendum: John Carter mentions the tree rings of white suburbs surrounding a rotted out urban core.
This is identical to the ring defense of Aryan villages that formed around the cities they had built, and lost. The "sons of heaven" who "looked upon the daughters of the earth [agriculture] and found them fair [pale]" were the half-black Gutian slaveraider ancestors of the Nosen we deal with today as creators of the "civil rights" movement.
They and their proxy armies of full-black "beast-men" brought down Mesopotamia, just as their HIAS migration racket is committing a mass swarm attack of White civilization today. Great Replacement of Whites is what they DO, it is their founding ethnos.
And why do they do this? Power, control and wealth. The clever humans with little to no morality use these kinds of psychological manipulations to get the masses to do as the elites desire even going so far as to get the masses to engage in self-harm which we are already seeing. In the past, this was kept somewhat in check until these same immoral people figured out that if they added feminism to the mix they could get better results as women and sexual access is the one thing that otherwise strong men will concede to.
Feminism is societal cancer and if it's not ended it will be used to end us as a society. Feminism is key and they know it.
One was a convicted child rapist as well. Others have made this point before but it's telling that a man can open fire in a leftist rally and hit three men, one of whom is a paedophile and another is violent towards women.
This seems like a good opportunity to plug Owen Benjamin. He was already ostracized because he spoke up against the trans kids narrative back when it was very taboo to do so. Then he refused to back off on the Word of Power - "How can the word Necrophilia be less offensive? That's the real N word." He said. He's been banned from countless media platforms and payment processors, all for refusing to stay silent on the Words (and ideas) of Power. He has a huge library of livestreams at unauthorized.tv, and he's on Bitchute too I believe. I've been a fan of his for years, so given the topic at hand, I figured a plug would be ok.
Yes, I'm aware of Big Bear.
Power Word Chimpout.
Here's a recent live stream on the Shiloh Hendrix controversy from Owen Benjamin. https://odysee.com/@OwenBenjamin:6/episode2180:2
Haha, I'm curious to see what he says. He's so often completely against the grain, but that's what I like about him. I'll watch it later for sure.
He's been all over X. Owen is firmly on Team Shiloh.
His comments on the Shiloh topic start around 20:30
Watched it, and I'm glad he's on board.
He is on Rumble as well.
The NAACP is all over this because their power is at risk; the power to force whites to cower to them over this 1 word. It's not that different from slave owners who got upset when slaves spoke disrespectfully. Thanks to liberal academics, public school teachers, Hollywood and media in general, blacks have been constantly told all their life that they are victims who are but 5 minutes away rom being hunted down and killed by white's and yes many actually believe this.
if they let this woman get away with using forbidden knowledge , a word in this case, they fear a loss of power and control over what in America is the majority. Once whites stop being intimated by this, the black community fears they might start holding blacks who commit crimes , accountable for those crimes and I mean far more so then currently. Black sin America are %13 of the population and commit %52 of the violent crimes. Intimidating whites over this forbidden knowledge has helped keep accountability at a minimum. Should white's stop fearing this, they may start actually imprisoning every black violent criminal.
Their fears are well-founded.
Spot on. They've got to be very worried about this.
Giving money to support a single mom who called a child a niggard makes me feel so patriotic, and I'm not even American!
It's like the most American thing you could do, unironically.
that's the beauty of America, anyone who really wants to can become American and so many do.
Nah, Americans are the descendents of the original settlers who ended up fighting the British and writing the constitution. Everyone who came after that isn't American, they're just USA citizens. I could buy citizenship, but I'd never be American.
before it was a welfare state, the people who came here were tough enough to make it which makes them Americans in my book. Nowadays, you're probably right.
There are American ethnic groups who were in America before it was founded and did not fight the British, but are still Americans.
"American" is a specific thing, that's why they have a constitution defining their people and rules. Anyone else who isn't in that constitution isn't American. They're "North American", but not American. The Cherokee aren't American, they're Cherokee living within the American empire. The Barbarians weren't Roman.
Technically I was wrong. I was referring to French and Spanish Americans who have been in America since the USA was founded, but the USA didn't incorporate the land they lived on until later. But I still think it makes little sense to not consider them Americans. Usually the qualifier "Old Stock" is used to single out settlers of the original 13 colonies, not to claim sole right to the title of American.
The French and Spaniards who settled around the Americas were colonists, and were ruled by France and Spain. The old stock Americans are different because they declared independence - big difference. Being the descendent of a colonist is a weird sort of purgatory - As a Canadian, that's the boat I'm in. We're still technically owned by the British crown - one reason why Canadians lack identity beyond "Not American".
I think the "America is an idea, Anyone can be American" ideas are propaganda word spells trying to delegitimize the notion of there being an actual American Nation.
No matter what the map says, you are my sister, my blood kith and kin, and I would defend you like family. White Pride Worldwide o/
For whatever reason, "race relations were better in the 90s" is one piece of internalized propoganda I can't quite shake. The Fresh Prince et al really did a number on Millennials.
Sounds like younger generations may not have that problem.
They absolutely don't.
I realized today in reading the stories around this story, that actually even thinking the Word of Power is like being told to defecate in one's pants; it's the toilet training of racial noticing.
Yep
It comes into my mind whenever a black person says "cracker". I think whites should make "cracker" their power word.
Nah.
Nazi.
The N-word for Whites.
That's another power word but they've been using on us, and it's fast running out of power.
Correct it is running out of power... FOR THEM.
The Word of Power for whites is "Racist". To this day, the average pale face will be completely cowed by that word. Even the word Nazi is pretty much synonymous.
The establishment obviously feels that one Word is forbidden and the other justified.
I've been saying for a while that the r-word needs to become our word.
You can already see signs of this happening. On the left it is only ever used for whites, making it a racial slur. On the right it is used as an in-group identifier. The only remaining piece to fall into place is to savagely attack out group members who use it aggressively, and we're starting to see that happen too.
Heh. Putting a whole new spin on "this is a Racist nation!"
Might that someday be like calling us a Christian nation, the stain of the Heretic which our Masters must erase.
"Oh my kippa! The White People might start putting bug powder in the showers again...because racist!!"
My take on the 90s Pax Belairia was that middle class whites started hanging out with small numbers of middle class blacks who were white-acting. We thought it was the End Of History (TM). The very next thing that happened was those white-acting blacks got attacked as race traitors.
Quit it Gil... remember...
Snitches get stitches.
Brilliant, John. It was so well-reasoned I just donated. The only other time I've contributed to a white person targeted for a racial "crime"/hitjob was Kyle Rittenhouse. What's up with the United States' upper Midwest, by the way?
Numerology generally is crackpottery, but the 80-year thing seems to have some evidence to support it. The Soviet Union, obviously, had that as a lifespan but it looks like Israel and the Anti-White Empire (to the degree the two are distinguishable) are about to go tits up, too, after an eighty-year run. Lies seem to have an expiry date.
You particularly nailed it here, and it is why I opened my wallet:
" But this is about more than helping Shiloh: it’s about breaking the taboo, stripping the word of its power, and setting our culture free."
I don't care if Shiloh engages in human sacrifice. The time to take our own side is now. Let's build on this.
Well said, many thanks, and indeed things seem to be changing very rapidly.
I suspect it's generational in nature. 80 years is four generations, so it completes the bad times hard men good times weak men bad times cycle.
This is why we're due for another big event IMO. Everyone who had first hand personal experience of the Great Depression is dead.
Strauss-Howe, yes.
I was raised on those Depression stories, my older brother and sister were born in the midst of it. (1935 and 36.) I think you have perfectly nailed the nature and reason for a 4 generation saeculum as the good times-bad times cycle. Outstanding.
TY, it originally came to my attention b/c all the Silent generation cohort in my family had deep pantries, maybe half a room or more devoted to canned & long term food, some of it quite old (as in, a couple decades past the 'best buy' date).
You only do that because you lived through a period when you couldn't get enough to eat.
I've never heard of regimes having an 80-year lifespan, but it's probably related to the adage, "Science advances one funeral at a time." In other words, maybe they die when all the people who founded them have died.
It isn't original to him, but former Israeli Ehud Barak recently expressed concern, and it is a fear widely shared there, that no Jewish kingdom/government ever lasted more than 80 years. That old, numerical superstition has gotten fresh attention as a result of him. There does seem to be something to it, and maybe it is due to the funerals you referenced.
The first time a bunch of European religious fanatics with state backing got the idea they could take over a chunk of the middle east was the first kingdom of Jerusalem which lasted about 88 years, so sounds about right. The various reboots were shorter lived.
Personally I think she was wrong to call the little black kid a nigger.
The correct term for such is 'pickaninny.'
It is time to revive the sophisticated racism of our forebears.
Perhaps "Hottentot". Is that sophisticated enough? How about the infamous but popular "Jigaboo"?
Why not kaffer/kafer if we're going that route?
If I recall correctly, the first spelling is a latinisation of the Arabic "khaffir" (or "kafir", I've seen it spelled that way too); unbeliever, also a slur close to the Arabic word for non-moslem Negros.
The second is from Boer/Dutch, meaning "louse" or "lice".
In Old Norse, Negros were called Blåmän (sing. Blåman). Blå = Blue, Män = Men. Bluemen.
Oh dear. Did I just turn Smurf into a racial slur?
Blacks are also called blue people in Irish Gaelic: duine gorm.
Hm. Given the amount of contact between the Norse and their Bronze Age-ancestors, and the peoples of Ireland (and England - potentially even dating back to Doggerland) for several centuries, I wonder who inspired who to call them that.
Different from genetic archeology determining who had the gene for red hair and eyes the colour of the sea, this one is trickier.
Did "blå" mean the color we call "blue" in Old Norse? I seem to recall that color terms have shifted a bit, and that 'blue' may have originally meant a type of black.
So the Vegas entertainment show "Blue Man Group" translates into Swedish as "a bunch of niggers"?
If we translate it via Old Norse, yeah you could arrive at that meaning, though it would read:
"Negergrupp" - Negro-group
Fun factoid: When Miles Davis performed in Sweden for the first time, the tabloids gave rave reviews about "the gay Negro orchestra", which was considered very progressive language at the time.
Wouldn't that be "Blåmangrupp" in Old Norse? I'm sure the term "Neger" didn't reach the Scandinavian languages until the 1500s or so.
My personal favorite is ''Porch Monkey'', which I unironically self-apply and schpread around whenever possible - mainly because it has no power in my world - and - CLERKS II RULES!! Hosting porch monkey jams on my front deck with cracker musicians - race isn't a focus at all or in the least - we play tunes by black and white artists with equal and mutual love, respect, and soul because that's really what it's all about. Guess I'm just a racist nigger Nazi whitie at heart having been ostracized by my own culture for not being sufficiently PC/WOKE, but hey, if you're after a little TRUTH AND SOUL where all these words and skin colors and posturing and hatred are just sociopolitical poopsmear, jam sesh at my place is where you'll find it..... You didn't read this. I was never here.
Good DAY^^
“Hottentot” is the old term for the Khoekhoe of southern Africa, not for Somalis or Bantus.
Call them that anyway. It's equivalent to blacks calling every Southerner or non-urbanite a redneck.
There are almost no slurs for whites that are actually hurtful, because being white is not hurtful.
🤣🤣
she probably never heard that word in her life. Shows how little actual "white supremacy" there is. They've called wolf way too many times.
For all his faults, I believe Britain's prince Philip still used that term publicly.
🤣🤣
Thinking of the Biden White House spokesthing.
you mean the furtrader?
It's time, time to take our nations back. Like the Ents in LOTR the whites are going to wake up and realize they are strong
They've planned for this...
Why do you thing the left is pushing so hard & fast for mass immigration? It is to make native people of Western nations minorities sufficiently quickly so they can no longer muster a majority vote to say no. Once that threshold is gone democratic means will be exhausted and some kind of revolution will become necessary.
It's a race against time.
😐 saw whatcha did there
All it will take is one winter with no power. For us it will be cozy snowman weather. For the immivaders it will be a reason to flee south.
I do think a likely outcome in N. America is everyone self-segregating to the climates their ancestors evolved in and declaring new separate countries. The south will be black, the southwest Hispanic, and the north will be white.
And here we'd be, with popcorn popped over our woodstoves but no electric power to watch the reactions to the fleeing immivaders of the Catholics south of the border.
Perhaps the revolution will not be televised.
Great Dyeus. We had to flee to the most miserable climate on earth to get away from the Sun people. Just going outside can kill you, freezing to death.
Sorry. Born in L.A. Allergic to pants.
This is one of the great fears of our social controllers. Their magic words lose their power.
What we call racism is really mild xenophobia; an innate and universal phenomenon. Only whites try to change this. It is xenophilia we must explain. This is not normal and must be educated into us.
The limits of xenophilia have now been reached. We are learning different cultures do not mix well, with one or two exceptions.
Alas anti-racism is now a religion along with climate catastrophe and feminism. The enemy of all this is not the white, racist, sexist man. Their enemy is reality. None of their philosophies work.
As for race, our future will be ethnic wars. It is the conflicts that will sweep away the last of the xenophilia and the associated elevation of magic words.
I suspect the era of racial conflict will be short and sharp. Governments will be brought down. Invaders will be remigrated. And that will be that.
I agree. The superb organizational skills that will be brought to bear will assist. It needn't be bloody or protracted. It is a mental adjustment more than anything. Frankly, once the ladies start feeling threatened it is only a matter of time; that will override their manipulated nurturing instincts.
That's why Shiloh is so significant imo. Remove the mental block, the will reemerges, and everything falls into place from there.
Yep. It is particularly striking in a woman given how susceptible they are to the feelz invoked by the propaganda around race and immigration.
I suspect we are going to find out pretty soon. The right has lamented on violence or lack thereof from the left in 2024/25. I am under strong suspicion the reason it did not materialize is because the left traded its best shock troops (blacks) for illegal migrants.
The stories of loaded EBT cards and fancy hotel stays had to have done a number on the black population’s affair with the Dems. I suspect many of the evil brains on the left have figured this out now. They are desperately trying to make it happen now. Sorry of Metcalf and Shiloh will no doubt rile up their victim status.
I was against this initially as Trump seemed to be making headway early on. But now I say fuck it let’s get it on. Blacks only understand power imo and that will need to be demonstrated effectively.
I think it is less likely to be a confrontation rather than a dim awareness among the currently privileged groups their special status is waning. I think that will trigger panic.
Many groups look at what whites did to EACH OTHER during WW2 and pause for thought. At least the intelligent ones do. Why are we abusing this group etc.
Next we’ll notice the emperors have no clothes!
We should all be like the little boy in that story, pointing out the truth in public when no one else will.
It gives others "permission" to tell the truth as well. That is the magic of it, and the reason that the corporate media and the Wikipedia are so ruthlessly censored.
Next we will notice everyone has noticed, even if they are not yet saying things out loud.
For those who despair, we must remember their approach is dependent on propaganda to paper over the cracks. Propaganda is expensive, and our resources cannot sustain it.
I outlined that here:
https://abysspostcard.substack.com/p/dead-mans-brake
Yes, that's an extremely important point. It's how preference cascades start.
Yes I agree. We are forgetting how unnatural xenophilia actually is. As I outlined in that piece above, it must be specifically educated into us, and even then reality chips away at it.
This chipping away is accelerated by immigration as we come into close contact with people different from us.
I believe the future is a total reversal of the last thirty years. Energetic repatriation basically.
Sharp piece. Re-allowance of freedom of association would forestall the coming conflict after the propaganda totally fails, but those who matter are too constitutionally opposed to the idea to allow it. That likely is a good thing, too, given the acceleration of The Great Replacement. Reaching a head sooner than later helps us. We are at the outer limits of permissible sorting, fragmentation and self-segregation, and the inevitable confrontation indeed is close.
All good points. But I think Shilohgate represents exhaustion, with the collapse of the narrative as a consequence. No strategy, not even some tribal awareness for whites. More of a fuck-this moment. As those moments accumulate they become impossible to hide.
A corollary to this is the inevitable hysteria from the usual suspects, not the least of them the more privileged groups in Western nations. As Thomas Sowell reminds us, when you are used to preferential treatment then equal treatment can seem like prejudice. So something akin to a fuck off will seem all the more shocking. But we will be seeing much more of this and the hysteria of course.
Shiloh indeed had a spontaneous "fuck this" moment and I agree these will accelerate and are accelerating to the horror of the privileged. What I am watching is the widespread "fuck this" attitude of donors and supporters. This is where the change is most noticeable. Some of these types would have been joining a lynch mob against Shiloh not so long ago but also appear truly fed up and not merely opportunistic, though even the latter also represents rapid advancement.
I didn't earlier tie up this point, so I will now: just as people have found they will not be left alone, and even self-segregation--which is unavailable to people like Shiloh--has a hard limit, defensive actions will give way to confrontation by necessity. The erasure of preferential treatment is just the outer edge and we see outlines of related policy changes. Again, whether those are opportunistic/defensive is beside the point. They most likely will not forestall the regime's end, and the one that could, freedom of association, likely won't be on the table, but at least a segment of the ruling class sees the handwriting on the wall.
I agree some of our rulers are reading the tea leaves and getting nervous. I believe this aided the reelection of Trump. Nervousness. Let's placate the people we fear.
So I don't doubt some of them get it. But this is ultimately an existential fight. The smarter elites cannot really believe mass immigration was going to end well.
You know, you almost never make a comment that I don't agree with.
That is very flattering of you to say so.
It is one of the things we forget about the online world. In among the six second videos, doomscrolling and porn it provides a means to connect with those on the same wavelength. A first in history. A kind of miracle we overlook too often. This is a source of strength and perhaps even a lifeline for some.
And let's not forget our lords and masters are none too capable. When the magic words do lose their power what then? I doubt they have a plan B given the comedy levels of ineptness of their plan A.
Regardless of anything else, Shiloh Hendrix is a mother with a small child. She is entitled to the security of her property and person as a matter of law. She is entitled to demand her rights and equally entitled to the concern and support of her fellow citizens, regardless of her race or theirs. Solidarity amongst Africans should not take priority over Shiloh Hendrix's wellbeing. The fact that it does reveals how rotten the civic nationalist project has become.
Furthermore, what possible moral authority does a Somali have in regard to a case like this? None that I can see.
The great weakness of the US is the lack of genuine loyalty, empathy or respect between classes. Upper class whites have developed a patron/client relationship with blacks and are forming alliances with any number of other POC from the Global South. All at the expense of sub-elite whites.
As for the issue of disrespect, amongst modern whites (above all transalpine ones) social status is downstream from compliance with behavioural norms and personal achievement. It is not downstream from ancestral status.
And the enforcement of coerced respect is a form of menace, which is criminal in itself. The fact that practically all blacks (and their allies) think that menace is OK and that disrespect (real or imagined) warrants abuse, even murder (as appears to be the case with Karmelo Anthony) reveals the true state of race relations.
This is one of the most accurate statements I've seen. Working class white people are basically the greatest losers from globalism and the Western elites are like those animals that eat their own young.
The problem is downstream from a range of factors. It is more than globalization.
Washington has been playing the black card for a long time. The Reconstruction era, then Civil Rights.
Globalization makes things more urgent, as elites seek allies overseas in order secure co-operation in trade and finance. The price for liberalising financial flows and trade is paid in migration. It is a quid pro quo. And we know who pays the price.
In terms of allies I meant more the alliances between the left & “client minorities” which are granted welfare and preferential treatment for their votes at the direct expense of the bottom-most native population. But the answer is still valid in your regard.
Man I am gutted - yesterday my country just voted for 3 more years of this crap.
The UK, Canada, and Australia are all in the same position it seems.
Definitely. Deindustrialized client states larping as treasured allies. All three have chronic trade deficits financed by money laundering and capital flight. A shared obsession with real estate ponzi schemes to maintain illusions of prosperity. Also replacing their own people ASAP.
In a truly perverse irony the Crown in Parliament now serves to offer political and legal protection for Quislings. And the absurdity is compounded by the fact that we, of all people on the planet, should understand what is happening and how it is being done. The tools of control developed in the Raj, Malaya and Fiji are applied to us.
On the bright side, South Africa is crumbling, Canada faces renewed pressures for secession and the UK helotry are becoming inflammable. This will tax the skills of the networked, trans-continental, regime under which we live.
I don't fancy their chances, for precisely the reasons of internal instability you mention. Those tools were ultimately insufficient to hold onto colonial possessions. Domestic application also comes with a self-limiting expiry date.
Difference this time is they'll have nowhere to fall back to.
I understand. I voted early on Thursday. Appalling choices on the ballot. I expected that Dutton would win simply because he would do marginally less damage. Did not expect a strong win for Albanese.
At the moment I prefer not to think about the future...the Voice#2, migration, Green energy, Islam, civil liberties, taxes.
Fingers crossed: the Senate may, just may, dull the impact. Take it easy.
The entirety of the extra-US anglosphere is in a dark place right now. Given the propensity of our elites to cooperate on matters of policy, political tactics, narrative management, etc, I suspect games are afoot.
Am extremely worried about the convergence in policy. If Starmer doubles down on digital repression they may well target dissidents in the Old Dominions to make an example of them. The UK has publicly broached extraditing posters/publishers from overseas. London cannot extradite US citizens for posting dangerous or proscribed content, but there are no limits on what the authorities here will do if asked. And Canberra is already terrified by the internet and ready to go full Big Brother.
The legal system here has been crumbling for ages. At one stage they protected the reputation of a former foreign minister (Downer, who helped start the Russiagate stuff with a rumour he heard in a bar in London) by gaoling a whistleblower after a secret trial that led to his barrister, an ex attorney general, fleeing the country. This would once have been unthinkable. And key barristers specialising in civil rights have retired, one to France.
The US at least has Trump pushing back. We are exposed to the worst of it.
Terrifying that our women are now considered mere prey.
Not gonna lie though, seeing a four year old niglet stealing from a baby's bag had to be like witnessing a young chimp use tools for the first time...a moment of advent that shapes how the rest of their life will look and play out.
Same here, slightly later in time.
It has been black criminality and the excusing of it, that has got people's goat. Sick and tired, and fed to the teeth with tolerating it.
Does the word "nigger" cause problems with Substack, or does your exclusive use of "Word of Power" throughout the article stem from your own having still ingrained the taboo? It just seems weird to read an article about how "nigger" needs to lose its taboo that seems unwilling to use the word itself.
That's the joke.
Every time I read it I heard the voice of Hermaeus Mora.
The WORD of POWERRRRR.
PS
Nigger
*skyrim level up music*
SPEECH INCREASED TO LEVEL 100
Thomas, before I can decide whether to be deeply offended by your use of the term "nigger," I have to know whether you are white or Asian, in which case I will be traumatized, or Black or Hispanic or Arab, in which case I will find your use of the term charming and brotherly (because no Blacks, Hispanics, or Arabs ever practiced slavery ever). So please identify your race, so I know whether I should be traumatized or feel lighthearted after reading your comment.
That's the point of using the phrase, it's a demonstration of the convention and it's hold on the cultural zeitgeist.
Correct.
We're not all Americans, we're not a nation of immigrants, we're not an idea nation, we were not all born equal, discrimination and racism are good things, diversity is our weakness, tolerance is cowardice, there's no such thing as equality, etc.