The 'inserted centuries' hypothesis is strangely compelling. Multiple investigators have arrived at it from different directions, and it seems to resolve a number of otherwise very strange archeological mysteries that require academics to twist things into pretzels to match the generally accepted chronology.
The 'inserted centuries' hypothesis is strangely compelling. Multiple investigators have arrived at it from different directions, and it seems to resolve a number of otherwise very strange archeological mysteries that require academics to twist things into pretzels to match the generally accepted chronology.
As to Moses and Exodus: quite obviously fake in my opinion. There's probably a kernel of truth to it though. My guess is that the story is based on the Hyksos narrative, which is the only thing in Egyptian history that really resembles Exodus. Of course, the Hyksos didn't escape: they were expelled.
The 'inserted centuries' hypothesis is strangely compelling. Multiple investigators have arrived at it from different directions, and it seems to resolve a number of otherwise very strange archeological mysteries that require academics to twist things into pretzels to match the generally accepted chronology.
As to Moses and Exodus: quite obviously fake in my opinion. There's probably a kernel of truth to it though. My guess is that the story is based on the Hyksos narrative, which is the only thing in Egyptian history that really resembles Exodus. Of course, the Hyksos didn't escape: they were expelled.