119 Comments
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

I was in England recently. The country is *totally* destroyed, I don't see how it's possible for them to come back from the unlimited African and Muslim immigration they've imported no matter what they do with elections. The country is still pretty white - far whiter than the U.S. - but the African and Muslim immigrants - whose fertility rates are far higher than the natives - are far less able or willing to integrate than the Catholic hispanics that have mostly swarmed America. I also saw Net Zero propaganda everywhere (i.e. starvation propaganda), and the police in the country are there only to harass the natives and prevent a native uprising while the rapefugees continue their lawlessness. Typical anarcho-tyranny.

Then again, England totally deserves to be destroyed for allying with the Rothschilds to ruin Europe. And this unholy alliance occurred long before the World Wars. According to Ernst Junger, the energy that Dostoyevsky picked up on upon his visit to London in 1862 was that the city was “Baal”:

“Dostoeyevsky apparently saw something reassuring in the looser constitution of Paris and something frightening in the order of London. This attests to his penetrating but humane look. He saw Baal enthroned behind the spectacle on the Thames, and it frightened and fascinated him as it had inspired the portrayals of many others before and after him….

The enduring reputation of this God Bel is of a hard and merciless master. The name Babylon, its principal seat, became synonymous with the metropolis as such, especially in its night side. Beyond this, Dostoyevsky also saw something specific: the stamp of puritanism in which enormous deployments of energy were coupled with an unwavering conscience. Hence, it is no coincidence that it was precisely in those puritanical zones that machine technology and its related forms of exploitation brought forth the precedents and model cases for critical reflections on these same phenomena….

In his Paris days, Dostoyevsky was undoubtedly also in Montmartre, but it was not there that Baal appeared to him to reign. He saw an orderly fabric in the Parisian ambience, in London an obscene disorder. We might have suspected the opposite impression, yet it is precisely here that his artistic incorruptibility is demonstrated - the artist whose gaze penetrates through the social veneer, through the varnish on a masterpiece, to its ground.”

Expand full comment
author

He was there during Victoria’s reign, so it isn't surprising he saw it as a sort of puritanical machine.

Karma or no, and I'm not saying that isn't playing out in a big way, it still breaks my heart. Which doesn't matter, as it will of course get very much worse before there's any possibility of it getting better.

Expand full comment
founding
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

For the record Victorian London was not remotely Puritanical. It was packed with brothels and respectable women did not leave the house unaccompanied because of the risk of being mistaken for streetwalkers.

As for finance, the Rothschilds were not allies, merely useful commercial agents for successive generations of UK governments, just as their cousins were for the governments under which they lived. The unification of Germany under Prussia was supported by the Frankfurt branch of the family through their man in Berlin, Bleichroder, who met with Bismarck almost daily for several decades. Many German ultra-conservatives used to whine that unification was a Jewish intrigue.

Dostoyevsky was a great novelist and full of insight but not about politics. The world was a vastly better place when the map of the world was mostly red. Victoria's England set the pinnacle of achievement for innovation and accomplishment. The resentment this inspired still colours assessments and will always do so.

Expand full comment
author

There may have been brothels but the Victorians were known for being an uptight bunch. At least this has always been my impression.

Expand full comment

No conflict between those.

Uptight at home, in business and public functions.

Let loose at the house of ill repute.

The brothel and whoring simply slots into place in the social hierarchy; do it the right way and it ceases being a wrong thing to do.

For a modern example, look at japanese "salary men"; tie so tight it almost beheads them when at office, tie around the head kamikaze-style and downing booze and groping women like it's the end of days after work.

Or the french system of legal brothels back in the day: the wife was for family life and having children with, and feeling love for - the whore was for carnal acrobatics.

And as is evident from moslem cultures: the more uptight in public, the more base in private.

Expand full comment

Haha, and now we live in a society which is ostensibly Sodom & Gomorrah no one is actually having any sex.

Expand full comment
Jul 8Liked by John Carter

Ray Davies would agree with your impression:

"Long ago life was clean

Sex was bad and obscene

Victoria was my queen..."

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

the British Empire is the best thing that's ever happened to all the shithole colonies it possessed.

Expand full comment

Catholic beaners are not integrating with Americans. Lol

Expand full comment

Most Hispanic immigrants work and most of them are not committing crimes. That's a level of integration far above what one is seeing in England.

Expand full comment
Jul 6·edited Jul 8Liked by John Carter

They will never be integrated with our culture. They definitely are not equals to anyone I know, and they don't belong here. Every time I see beaners working on apartment complexes we don't need, buildings which will likely house them and their liberal children, all I think is they are wasting space. For every beaner here, there is a White man who should be in his spot - for every crappy beaner neighborhood, we should have farms with beautiful American families.

The American border war with Mexico never ended - we just started liking tacos and "le based Catholic beaners" instead of our own folk.

I have had enough experiences with them to view them the same as blacks. I don't hate them, but I want them gone from my nation.

Expand full comment

Yep they're a surly lot, I rate them right down there with the Scots and the Irish..

Expand full comment

You ought to back to whatever rock it is that you crawled out from under. So should anyone who liked your comment. Creep.

Expand full comment

No, the mexicans should go back to Mexico. Traitor.

Expand full comment

Like Carlos Santana? After all, he never integrated with "our" culture.

It's admittedly hard to tell whether you're just being ironic, because it's hard to believe anyone could be such complete fool.

Expand full comment

Spanish is a second language in the US, you even have it on forms handed out in government offices.

Expand full comment

For those of us unfamiliar, which of Junger's works would you recommend? I should start reading him soon, because I'm not getting any Junger.

Expand full comment
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

He's most famous for his Storm of Steel about his World War 1 experience, but Junger matured as he aged and his later views were quite different from his earlier ones. His views of war especially shifted from that of an adventurous approach to spiritual growth to that of a war as waged by unemotional, unheroic technicians, which he disliked. I quite enjoyed his World War 2 diaries where you can see some of this transition take place (https://www.amazon.com/German-Officer-Occupied-Paris-Perspectives/dp/0231127405). His On the Marble Cliffs, The Glass Bees, The Forest Passage, The Worker and Eumeswil are all well known.

Expand full comment

Heyo!

Sigmar Academy on YouTube has some Junger reviews I believe.

Expand full comment

Very interesting observations👏👏👍

Expand full comment

Don't be so dramatic. You've clearly not looked very closely. You've even pointed out that we're still whiter than the US although Lithuanians are still foreigners, less than 75% of the pop is actually British now. Fortunately the blacks are only 4% and their violence is confined to London, mostly.

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Both of my teenage boys would have voted Reform. Their interest in the election and its outcome surprised me and suggests a groundswell of dissatisfaction and awareness among their age group of how our country is being ruined. Labour's reign will be truly dreadful in terms of swamping us with even more Asians and Africans not to mention their ridiculous swallowing of the nation-destroying climate narrative. I live in a fairly rural area of England and their presence (99% males) is becoming increasingly perturbing.

Expand full comment
author

They're leaking out of the cities. Here in Canada too. And normies are noticing, and not liking it. Playing with fire…

If we end up with the support of all the white boys, I fancy our odds. Motivated mobs of rowdy British teenagers have done great things throughout history.

Expand full comment

We crushed the Indians once we can do it again. And the first Indians were hardened warriors and survivalists not soft Uber drivers.

Expand full comment
author

They may be Uber drivers now but have you looked at us?

Expand full comment

Fat pub hooligans are more capable than thin Somalian phone-shop dwellers and soft-handed Pajeets. We'll win.

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Quick correction : the Reform "candidate" caught on camera wasn't even a supposed candidate, he was merely campaigning for them as a volunteer. Much more tenuous, much more sketchy

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for that. Indeed that makes it even more sus.

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Sounds like a plant. I suspect the same will happen - or is happening - here in Canada with PPC supporters.

Expand full comment

This long-ex-Brit thanks you for the report. The most pleasing part was hearing of the continued existence of the Monster Raving Loony Party. I remember them fondly from the 80s.

Expand full comment
author

The British tradition of bizarre parties standing for election is one of my favorite things about the weird world of British politics. It's so quintessentially English.

Expand full comment

We used to have more character but Blair changed the country from privacy and idiosyncracy to CCTV, HR and Cool Britannia.

Expand full comment
Jul 13Liked by John Carter

The Cool Britannia part was good. A shot in the arm for a country that was grey and bleak. I don't think Blair should get any credit for that though. It was the creative spillover from Thatcherite wealth creation. Blair just gave us technocratic Atlanticist authoritarianism, enthusiastically continued by Cameron and pals.

Expand full comment

I'm not so sure - it seems quaint now but the Spice Girls et al were considered vulgar and shocking at the time. In an era of piss bukkakes you can watch on your phone it all seems rather old-fashioned

Expand full comment

Further to this - really hard stuff used to be sold in plain brown packaging from very grotty shops in large cities. When I was younger I didn't even know it existed! Mail order was an alternative as well. It sounds even quainter but there was (and still is I think) the British Board of Film Classification. Their job was to watch anything for public release and classify it, with an 18-rating being avoided as it could sharply curtail sales. This also included watching nasty stuff and I think The Human Centipede had to have scenes cut before general release. In the era of "do as thou wilt", Netflix and 4k porn it's a waste of time.

Expand full comment

Nice metaphor. I'm here in the thick of it and I believe that tide has turned. The opposition, the anger and the hope now have a focal point and a voice. I fear some kind of war. The young here have no path in front of them, no future; this is a fight for their lives. The uni party have imported an army and made them promises. The damage of the covid tyranny is un-processed. On the bigger stage, the maddened and flailing neocons now have a lap-dog with a big, but time-limited majority here; will they use him for something? Something really stupid in Ukraine or the middle east. Interesting times.

Expand full comment
author

Ukrainian retardery is highly likely. Maybe a draft? All bets are off then.

Expand full comment

Do not fear war - embrace war. Our enemies do.

We will only get through by putting our heads down and doing what needs to be done.

No more being soft. It is time to be hard again.

Expand full comment
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

A few observations from this Englishman. First, we all knew that Labour was going to form the next government. The only regret is that the Conservative Party is not now decomposing in the shallow grave we dug for them before the election. They're still breathing and walking. Just. But, fortunately, it appears likely that they will commit suicide now anyway because (and get this!), post the election drubbing they have decided that they lost because they were too right-wing and they need to move more towards the centre to win back the voters. I kid you not.

Secondly, the young. Among 16-18 year olds, Reform is now joint favourite with Labour and in the lead among the boys. Bearing in mind that Reform have only existed for 3 years, it clear who has the momentum among future voters.

Third, Labour's victory is a mile wide but an inch deep. They are neither loved nor welcomed and even their most ardent supporters know it. I have been scanning a lot of the British leftie accounts on Xitter today and there is none of their customary snarling and gloating about their victory. If anything it is a bit muted with many admitting that their joy has been soured by the Reform showing added to which they cannot get round the fact that their team won with less votes than they got in the 2017 election.

Fourth, Labour's brittleness will come under intolerable strain when, as seems likely, the Muslims form an actual Islamic Party - something they've been talking about for a while now. Gaza actually won 4 seats in the British parliament this week in a sign of things to come. Either Labour feed the Muslim crocodile, in which case they will drive away any remaining working-class vote or the Islamic crocodiles will start emerging from out of their swampy waters and begin feeding themselves. Either way that's gotterdammerung for Labour.

There are a few more things I could add but it's late and I'm tired so will leave this here for now.

Expand full comment
Jul 7Liked by John Carter

Since Sweden is neck-to-neck with the UK on the road to societal and civilisational suicide, let me offer another take on the islamic hydra:

They'll try to launch a moslem party, and fail, and keep failing. As to why:

1) Moslems only keep the peace among themselves when they have an external enemy (us). Without that enemy, they revert back to infighting along sectarian and cultural ines almost immediately, until a Leader emerges, one who manages to ally with enough clans to stomp the rest into submission (which is what islam means anyway) - the way Saddam Hussein did. This is very unlikely a development until moslems are the majority in absolutel numbers; until then, they need the real englismen as an enemy to keep the peace.

2) Moslems are in all parties, as infiltrators and go-betweens party-clans/mosques/organised crime (and the mosques' financiers from Quatar, Saudi et c); as such it makes much more sense to keep infilitrating, normalising and slowly turning /every/ political party towards islam. This is the principle underpinning the playbook of the Moslem Brotherhood: to win, eventually, but finally, by playing the long game and fighting the Long War. As some moslem said once, allegedly:

"You [westerners] have clocks and watches, we have time".

3) Their home nations are deathly afraid of losing control of the diaspora, since they know full well how quickly this would splinter any semblance of islamic union as "westernised" moslems adopt our materialistic ways and commit "fitna" for profit, thereby de-legitimising islam both here and on their home front. As such, the backers of the moslem invasion keep a tight rein on their brethren via the mosques and the preachers, balancing on a see-saw of urging for more islmisation, yet trying desperately to keep moslems in the West from going full tilt into armed uprisings.

This is the way it is playing out here. My speculation:

Labour will play it slow, make noises against "islamism" to be able to please its english voters, while in effect doing nothing against islam/moslems so as to not aggravate its moslem voters (as islamism is a thing that only exists in the minds of western politicians, journalists and consumers of regime media).

Expand full comment

They're only 8% here - far too high of course but they'll not be an absolute majority any time soon. You are right about their in-fightinf, certainly.

Expand full comment

Excellent summary, well done. Some optimism as well instead of the usual moaning I've been seeing all over twitter and SS

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Rivers of Blood, someone said.

Well, UK is almost there, though "shitwater on tap" doesn't have the same ring to it.

Expand full comment
author

"As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much poo."

Or should that be the Ganges?

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Wanna bet there will be no internal war in UK before 2028 passes? xD Sending troops to Ukraine, or getting bombarded by Russia doesn't count, obviously.

Expand full comment

The same people forcing the western world's borders open are also planning to send the west's children to go fight for the borders of the Ukraine and Taiwan.

It's cuckoldry on a scale never before imaginable.

Expand full comment

Depends on how we'd define internal war.

I'll compare with Sweden:

Last year, ca 150 bombings, an equal amount of shootouts in public where at least one person died, thousands of robberies committed by non-white migrants specifically targetting swedes, somewhere in the region of 8 000 rapes committed by non-white migrants targetting swedish women, girls and boys, and more like that.

Does that count as internal war?

I'm not trying to be funny in any way. I just can't see why uniforms and insignia and some kind of declaration or something official matters in the slightest: the deed itself is what matters to me.

Expand full comment

Fair. Good point. But when I contemplate internal war (AKA civil war), I tend to be strict: military formations destroying each other. The distinction matters because war is violence on a whole another level beyond anything migrant gangs have been doing so far.

And in addition, when I said "internal war in UK", I meant war of white natives versus white natives. "Right" versus "Left". "Conservatives" versus "Liberals". In the case of UK, maybe even Royalists vs. Republicans. With all parties to the conflict fielding armed formations, many of them mechanised or motorised, using long-range precision munitions, EW, drone warfare. Filtration of residents when a town or village is taken. POW camps. Negotiations of representatives. Redrawing of the map. Change of political organization. And at the end, the famous military cementeries and monuments.

Expand full comment

Being strict with definitions is a good starting point, I agree, but reality tends to be messier and non-conformist. For a present-day example look at the wars when Jugoslavia collapsed.

No-one disputes it was war, but most participants lacked uniforms, didn't operate in any formal military structure-sense, and were often indistiguishable from organised crime in how they acted.

Or just look at Mexico. The Cartels are better understood as a criminal insurgency against legal power, and it wouldn't surprise me if the vastly outnumber police ad military in Mexico (and not having to adhere to the quaint notions of rules of combat/conduct and such tends to even out technological disparity between the parties).

What you describe for the UK will not happen. All whites are so brainwashed into thinking criticism against non-whites is the worst sin possible, that picking up arms against them is inconceivable, no matter what the non-whites do.

Most whites would rather have their nation invaded, colonised, occupied and their families hurt than say: "Darkies out!".

And then you have the liberal/libertarian fifth column endlessly droning on about "Look at group X, they come here and most of them are conservative [insert religion] and work" (never any facts to back the assertion about the "Good Migrant" up to be seen though). They'd never consider doing to the invaders, what the invaders are doing to us, because they see everyone as individuals to be judged on individual merit alone.

Which is akin to having rats in the house, but not setting traps since you don't know which rat is the one eating your food in the pantry. To extend the metaphor: if you're going to have rats in the house, they need to be kept in a cage as pets, else they revert to type.

Expand full comment

> For a present-day example look at the wars when Jugoslavia collapsed.

> No-one disputes it was war, but most participants lacked uniforms, didn't operate in any formal military structure-sense, and were often indistiguishable from organised crime in how they acted.

I have no idea where this came from. The entire thing in Yugoslavia was organized from day 1. First, the wars didn't just happen, they followed a ten-year period of decomposition, including a period of hyperinflation. The West is currently in it's own 10-year period of decomposition, and it will include an episode of hyperinflation. On the Croatian side, the entire thing was run by HDZ (Hrvatska Demokratska Zajednica - Croatian Democratic Community, a political party). They absolutely had the entire thing worked out. They were arming themselves in Autumn 1989 at the latest. Even today, the various free-minded locals in Zagreb know what where the apartments in Černomerec, a part of Zagreb, where people would go to be issued arms. HDZ also ran financing campaings abroad (mainly among Croats abroad) to fund the war effort. I also talked to a guy who claimed he was part of a kill squad around the start of the war. He claimed they were given a list of names from HDZ in Zagreb, of Serbs, and they were to kill them all in order to provoke the Serbs into a violent self-defence. The violent self-defence would then be used as cover to start a genocidal war against them. He claimed they killed many, but that some escaped. And as final evidence, look at recordings made at the start of the war: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ1wSffoSdg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOVw-827XfE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b6pCHTKHGw This early in the war, the main fighting was between Croat insurgents and YPA (Yugoslav People's Army, the official state military). There were also Serb insurgents who were also a proper military. At any rate, look at the fighters. They all have uniforms, insignia, command. They are a proper military.

If you honestly belive this was just a ragtag bunch of misfits killing another such bunch, you are horribly misinformed. The entire thing was a proper civil war, like the sort I contemplated when I said "internal war in UK".

Expand full comment

Should have been a bit clearer, because I think you misunderstood (and not on purpose): I know full well conventional forces fought in Jugoslavia.

I also know people who were there, fighting in unconventional forces, where maybe the liaison officer wore uniform, but no-one else.

Expand full comment

People like John Michael Grear have been predicting that the internet is a passing fad.

Complexity is its downfall.

Expand full comment

Absolutely!! Those of us who remember the pre-web days will always have fond memories of it. I honestly think as a species we do need a major break from it. It's made everyone more neurotic and unhinged. The social engineers who pushed it on the populations never took into account the repercussions it could have, which we all see now. The internet lost its role as one of the poster children of the myth of "perpetual progress" years ago, and turned back into what it really was all the time: a preposterously complex way to do things most people have always done by much simpler means, which only seemed to make sense during that very brief interval of human history in the 90s when fossil fuels were abundant and cheap.

Expand full comment

That could be a good thing. The pre-web internet was limited to some companies and universities (when they were still sane), and it was a better place. Making it available to everyone ruined that. Worse, together with handheld computers, it mentally destroyed a large swath of the population. I don't think anyone expected that to happen.

Expand full comment

My father expected it to happen. He predicted some 40 years ago that providing everyone with personal computers would create a population of idiots. I agreed.

Expand full comment

His predictions on the internet becoming a passing fad directly correlates with the degradation we're witnessing in all Western countries infrastructures and economies. It costs enormous amounts of money and resources to maintain those data centers. When shit hits the fan..who will maintain them for the rest of the population?

Like Greer says...the internet if it survives in the future will only be used by the ultra wealthy/military who have the means of buying and maintaining the infrastructures needed for themselves.

Expand full comment

Sorry misread internal for internet. My bad.

Expand full comment

Eh shit happens. You other comment kind of makes sense regardless. It's more of a general statement that does vibe with my comment. xD

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Balkanisation is where we heading.

In some Northern Towns that has already happened.

Labour can not and will not survive this….

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

The riots I've seen in Ireland - and that John has written about - seems to me to be the "trailer" of the main picture that's to come.

Expand full comment

My country will turn to civil war thanks to this feckless dithering democracy, I'm all the happier when it does happen, the mask will truly be lifted then and the scum can be burnt away.

Expand full comment

This is the right attitude to have. They want us stressed and depressed - be excited!

Expand full comment
founding
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Best stuff out there on the election by far. John, you are genuinely analytic. Cannot give higher praise than that.

Totally agree with your assessment of the real technocrats versus the larpers. Ditto the voters of the Monster Raving Looning Party. Not only are the latter the sort you'd want to meet personally I suspect that they would compare more than favourably in terms of character and in intelligence with the actual legislators of the last generation.

Expand full comment
author

That's high praise indeed. Thank you.

The MRLP voters could go either way really. They might be absolute schizos. But I suspect most of them would be more fun to talk to over a pint in a loud pub than would the modal Labour politician.

Expand full comment
founding
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

One important point. Labour's win was hollow in that their share of the vote is shrinking and there is little popular enthusiasm for the very dull and joyless types who set the tone for the government. But the UK is going to be revolutionised by stealth. Boredom is a powerful weapon, a resource that is used to misdirect attention, confuse and demotivate potential opposition. Intellectually and politically serious radicals understand this.

In the next few years we will see a master class in political and social engineering in the UK. A revolution from above via regulation, taxation, administrative and constitutional change. The smart money is already heading for the door but the rich are not going to be the prime target; instead middle class people who have assets and savings will be financially euthanised. Starmer was a very serious Lefty in his 20s and his gov't will consolidate the professional and managerial hold over the UK. The US will tolerate Labour as long as Westminster supports US foreign policy. Right wingers in North America should pay careful attention to the means used by Labour to disrupt the Reform Party and suppress dissent. The UK will be a laboratory for the GAE.

Expand full comment
author

That is undoubtedly what Labor plans to do. Whether they'll succeed, we'll see. That we can see their intentions and anticipate their methods is one advantage. That they are so widely hated is another.

Regardless, the next five years will be a grim time for the native inhabitants of Britain.

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

I never thought I would really give serious thought to leaving my own country, but the article is spot on the UK is becoming the third world and I would very much like to check out!

Expand full comment
author

Many such cases. The brain drain is the reciprocal movement to the mud flood.

Expand full comment

Belter!

Gonna have to pinch this one; it’d be rude not to! :D

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Canada is heading towards the same path, so I'm not sure I'd recommend coming here. Same with Australia from what I've heard. About the only western country I've heard that's actually clamping down on out-of-control migration is Denmark so there's that. (Gorgeous women too!)

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

U.S. is imploding with Dementia Joe and the treasonous administration

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Yes me to.

I would definitely recommend to everyone to ring fence your assets.

There coming after it all.

Expand full comment
Jul 6·edited Jul 6Liked by John Carter

In a grim sort of way, the result of this UK 'democratic election' is just a case of 'calling a spade a spade' because in reality Britain has been a lefty Uni party one-party state for 34 years now - ever since Mrs T was ousted by her lily-livered mps. Tory administrations since then have basically been wokeness on a slight time delay. As I depicted in this piece a while ago https://grahamcunningham.substack.com/p/carry-on-governing

Expand full comment
author

Precisely so. The current crop of Tories are all Blairites.

Expand full comment

What you call "Lefty", I call "Righty", but that descriptor is irrelevant to the fact that we have had no choice - Labour and Tory are two cheeks of the same backside.

Expand full comment

same as the US then

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

Fun travels, John.

Is it no surprise a pajeet was in control when the Tories blew up and a paki when the SNP failed to deliver? I'm not shocked; granted BoJo and Legs were pathetic globalist shills but Sunak pushed that draft crap. Just like the 2025 NDAA in the US, these rat bastards are dragging us to war.

Train and prepare, my friends. Build those wilderness survival skills if you don't have them. Stock up on long-term foods (rice and dried beans are usually preserved in mylar with an O2 absorber and keep forever). We don't have to go gently or quietly!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, man!

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

> The third most popular party is actually Reform, who obtained 14% of the popular vote, a remarkable achievement in a party that’s been around for a matter of months.

This has been happening rather regularly over the last decade, all over Europe (and probably further out). Maybe it's not so remarkable after all?

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

I’ve been a fan of Mr Farage for a long time. He’s got balls, guts, and stamina. His speeches before the EU parliament were great entertainment. That’s a fantastic photo of him. 😃

Expand full comment

First Past the Post breaks down when there are more than two viable candidates on a single ballot. Proportional representation allows fringe parties in and loses regionalism.

My preferred system would be local districts with Range Voting. With Range Voting it never hurts to show full support to your favorite candidate, while you can also give support to your lesser evil candidate(s). Range Voting forces fringe parties to appeal to normies in order to win while allowing multiple factions a chance to mix their vision with the mushy middle.

And, very importantly, Range Voting results give lots of information about the support of those candidates which didn't win (unlike Instant Runoff). This helps new parties build momentum.

https://rulesforreactionaries.substack.com/p/where-all-else-fails-change-the-rules

Expand full comment

(((They))) want us all dead despite their new world order plans falling into ruin. Amalak must be destroyed (please ignore all the Amalaks currently goyim). Perhaps after the boomers pass, leaving us /Whites as desipised and oppressed minorities, some small spark might catch flame, but it will be ugly, brutal, and hopefully deadly to the disgusting "enlightenment". It all depends on Team J getting brutally pantsed. God help us.

Expand full comment
Jul 6Liked by John Carter

I understand the triple parentheses, but what is the meaning of the slash before "Whites"?

Expand full comment
author

Sarcasm?

Expand full comment