It's not true, but I've seen it getting repeated on reddit and in other places. I think she knows France and the UK will never actually agree to cover us in the Nuclear Umbrella but was either yapping to boost the fear of American annexation or actually trying to pressure France a-la Zelensky v Trump/Vance since her announcement came like a day before Macron indicated he would be interested in replacing the US as Europe's Nuclear babysitter.
So perhaps it is true I got it mixed up. I don’t really have time now to dig into that, partly because it doesn’t change my OG point. UK doesn’t have a domestic nuclear deterrent. Whether it’s the warheads or the missiles that are on loan and need foreign permission to be used, the UK can’t fire when it wants to.
But antichrist isreal has the talpiot plan ..pegasus..candiru.....kill drones .money and expropriated ..filched.tipped off from .....*America"..jewmerica..not real Americans ..and dimona**
They just don't get it we have been watching them destroying our government for 10 years or more tracing tracking phone computer records on everything. God has taken the wheel.
The most clear aspect of Canadian Politics besides the Commie PM is that one of the political parties had a man that won the right to represent that party but Vagina-Supremists wanted the woman to run instead even if she didn't win that party, so - like the kind of lying dishonorable man-destroying inHuman viscous Witch that people wonder if they could throw her off a building an get away with to for safety of self and everyone else, ..
.. So, some woman got to stop suck Satan's Strap-on and false accuse him of rape.
Well, such a clear political vomit move you wonder why that lying horror was not dragged out by a mob and burn at the stake in public, as it was clearly vile woman vomit lies.
If women can have our babies tortured to death unborn on a whim, then dust to anyone that support her murder, but will not allow such a witch burned in public.
He is pressured to step down - some Witch takes his place (if she were not part of the false witness she would not have accepted,) but Stone Her to Death! was not screamed across the country.
If a supposed rape victim does not come forward with in 6 months and later accuses, she should be assumed a life-destroying Witch and .. what you think? Dragged in public while chained together with all the older adults in her blood-line .. erase that bloodline in their screaming? Perhaps?
Yea, Canada, your politics needs a group of 10-gauge shotgun erasers to clean house, then burn your fed. gov. down, perhaps.
I have no clue if the UK of today has the ability to maintain/create nuclear weapons of their own.
I'm only qualified to speculate on it, so to speak, but as I mentioned to Kertch (I think it was Kertch?) over at Eugyppius' the other day, if early 1970s India could manage it, how hard is it really?
I think the delivery system is the bigger issue rather than the actual warheads, but as I said, I'm only qualified to speculate.
On the third hand, the idea of an *EU-nuclear weapon programme* has been broached on the quiet - to me, that seems /more/ dangerous than doing without nuclear weapons, given the typical levels of competence displayed whenever the Union does something as a whole.
India managed it because Canada sold them a nuclear reactor. If they'd had to build a nuclear program from scratch it would have taken them much longer, I suspect.
My understanding is that making them small enough to launch is an issue, e.g. Pakistan has a couple nukes, but I've read they'd need to deliver them via a truck.
India can probably launch a few, but I doubt they have MIRV dial-a-yield weapons.
Yeah, that'd be my guess too, and handing a primed warhead over to suicide bombers with instructions to go blow it and themselves up at the target, well there's so much inbuilt fail in that idea so it's moot too.
The Americans used to have this idea of a nuclear bazooka. Range was shorter than the blast radius, is what I've seen claimed about it.
Do we have intelligence on israeli nuke sizes or development of missile systems, or secrete USA donations?
I suspect that they shipped and trucked them to many major cities throughout world where they sit in a basement or such, ready for false flag, or if they fail to win then set them all off, but more likely the black-mail national leaders.
If you saw any videos of the genociding Gazans that they do, snipers shooting small children in heads, rape-torture prisoners, torture to insanity, .., kill own people to prevent hostage trading, ..
.. do you think such demonic horrors wouldn't plant and set-off nukes?
Would they drink the blood of Christian children, or did I cross a line for those mass murdering psychos, you F-ing .. ? You'll do something about that, sure, while you jerk-off watching them kill 100's with bombs, yes?
He doesn't even realize it was his OWN government that betrayed him and the rest of his country. He doesn't understand that it isn't Trump who's to blame for the current situation, but rather that it's been Canada's political and bureaucratic class - people he and his parents (and maybe his grandparents) have been trusting to 'run the ship' for the last 60 years who put Canada directly in the position it is in now. He clearly has no idea that it was the ineptitude, apathy, avarice, and corruption of the political and senior bureaucrats in Canada over the last several decades that is directly responsible for the predicament in which Canada sits. He may well believe in the trite slogan that "CANADA IS NOT FOR SALE" but is oblivious to the fact that most, if not all, of the people running Canada apparently WERE and STILL ARE for sale.
At some point, the piper was going to have to be paid. Did anyone really think we could pay our own national security and national defence apparatus nothing more than lip service and anything good would come of it? For us or our allies? This young man might not like it, but Trump's grievances on Canada are absolutely correct. At some point, SOMEBODY was going to either point this out, be it Trump or someone else, or SOMEBODY was going to take advantage of this...like, say, China, India, Iran, and others.
The good news is, you're right. This kid, along with many of these other mouthpieces (Leaflibs and Puckstick Patriots - good essay link, by the by) are nothing more than posturing cowards. They wouldn't even stand up for their own rights as they were overtly and blatantly trampled on during the whole scam-demic by a government that made it no secret that they held the entire country in total contempt and derision. It's highly risible to think that they'd put up a fight against the US military, or anyone else for that matter. Besides, what exactly would he intend to use to participate in this 'insurgency', seeing as how pretty much all the firearms in the country were deemed illegal by fiat by the last PM...which he probably also did nothing about.
I tend to agree with you though, John. I don't think Trump is interested in taking Canada by military force at all because he really doesn't have to. Trudeau, and now Carney, have played directly into Trump's hands (either unwittingly or deliberately). Carney will probably win the upcoming election, after which he will carry on as his predecessor did by throwing the screws to the western provinces (particularly Alberta) and turning up the heat. Western alienation and talk of separation is already at an all time high, so it wouldn't be very long at all until Alberta (and maybe Saskatchewan) finally realize that the day will never come where they will ever get a fair shake from Ottawa and the east and decide to take the USA up on it's offer for statehood.
The rest....well, you did a pretty good job of 'wargaming' that possible scenario out in one of your last essays, which was quite well done by the way.
Anyway....just my $0.02 CAD...whatever that's worth today, thanks to inflation and the fact that anyone can post on the internet.
The fact that the puckstick patriots get worked up about American annexation, but yawned as the country was invaded by Indians, is a fatal condemnation of their shallow, performative patriotism.
He sounds like a typical product of Canadian government schools, with contented teacher/civil servant/index pensioned Boomer parents with three annual vacations, lakefront property in the Kawarthas and a place in Florida that they claim they'll get rid of (but won't).
"He doesn't understand that it isn't Trump who's to blame for the current situation, but rather that it's been Canada's political and bureaucratic class..."
Yeah, plenty to criticise there, but it actually is Trump's fault that Trump threatened to annex Canada. Just as it is a perfectly predictable consequence of abandoning Ukraine to its own devices that smaller countries are now contemplating the nuclear deterrent to secure their borders. If you dismantle the Pax Americana, these are the outcomes you can expect.
Except Trump has never actually threatened to annex Canada. Rather, he has said, repeatedly, that Canada would be better off as part of the USA than remaining an independent nation-state. Given how dependent the Canadian economy is on trade with the USA and the likely end of free trade for the foreseeable future, he may well be right.
Well, you're the one who claimed that "Trump threatened to annex Canada," which the Liberals, NDP and Canadian media have been saying for months despite, from what I can tell, the lack of evidence that he has ever done so. If you have any quotes that he has, please provide them. It's a convenient fiction, however, because it distracts from what I see as Trump's actual argument—that Canada would be better off as part of the USA—and the long-term mismanagement of Canada by its elites, while arousing a jingoistic anti-American patriotism to help Carney and the Liberals win the upcoming election.
As for the risks of dismantling the Pax Americana, I think you're again missing the point. It's not a question of whether or not to dismantle it because the post-Cold War uni-polar Pax Americana era is over regardless of what anyone in the USA could do. With the rise of China and India and the renewal of Russia, we now live in a multi-polar world. Are there risks attendant to that? Of course! But there are, I'd argue, even greater risks, i.e. World War III, if the USA were to try to pretend otherwise by insisting on trying to continue the global hegemony they once had. That's what provoked the war in Ukraine, the consequences of which have been utterly devastating for that poor country, with well over a million of its citizens killed or seriously wounded and Russia close to realizing the complete collapse of its military.
China is due for an impending demographic implosion and India posing a threat to the US on the world stage is fairly laughable. If you're arguing that Russia's military has been pushed to the brink of collapse then the idea that Russia is a serious long-term competitor also doesn't stack up for me.
You're correct that the direct deployment of NATO forces to engage the Russian military might trigger a nuclear exchange, which is why assistance to Ukraine has consisted of humanitarian aid, weapons and logistic support, not troop commitments. But allowing Russia to seize neighbouring countries without sanction would essentially be rewarding the aggressor, and as I already said, there are going to be more nukes in a world without a hegemon, not fewer.
I also don't see that Ukraine has somehow been taken advantage of here. Virtually no-one in the country supported the Russian invasion, and even today Zelensky has a majority approval rating. Try holding a Ukrainian referendum on the 'peace' deal that Trump is proposing and I'm pretty sure it would be shot down.
The Pax Americana is breaking down because the cost of sustaining it is impossible for the US. Free health care for all of you, courtesy of the US for example. We are done being your hog trough.
China certainly has demographic issues, but it also already has a massive population, which even in decline makes it dangerous for US hegemony in Asia. Moreover, because there is a significant gender imbalance in China due to a cultural preference for male children (and widespread use of abortion to have a male child during China's decades-long One-Child policy), the significant number of younger men unable to find a woman to marry makes China MORE dangerous. Having lived in Taiwan, with numerous friends there, I am greatly concerned about the threat of the mainland to it. I would prefer that Taiwan remain independent, de facto if not de jure, but a Chinese invasion, leading to a war between the USA and China, would be a catastrophe, not only for Taiwan but for the world. Given China's determination to unify Taiwan with it, and willingness to use force to make it happen, the best possibility would therefore be some kind of grand bargain between the USA and China to negotiate Taiwan's continued autonomy within an overall Chinese unity.
As for India, a country I've been to twice and traveled through large parts of, no, it won't pose a threat to the USA anytime soon, but again you're missing the point. It is now the world's most populous country and has immense potential, as well as nuclear weapons. It doesn't need to threaten the USA in order to be a factor in realizing a multi-polar world.
Also, I never suggested that Russia's military has been pushed to point of collapse. In fact, its military has gotten much stronger over the last three years. Given its extensive, and hard-earned, battlefield experience fighting in Ukraine and its own Kursk region, it has undoubtedly the most battle-hardened soldiers of any country in the world. And its hypersonic missiles, like the Oreshnik, are not only significantly more advanced than anything the US military has, but neither the US nor the Europeans have anything that can shoot them down. If you don't think that the Russia is not a long-term competitor to the USA, then you haven't been paying attention to what Russia has done over the last ten years to develop its economy and military to make them immune to sanctions by the USA and EU. Russia is winning, and arguably has already won, the war in Ukraine. It's only a matter of time, a few months at most, until the Ukrainian military collapses.
Ukraine absolutely was taken advantage of. You don't know the relevant history. When Bush Jr. insisted in 2008 that Ukraine would join NATO, no one in Ukraine wanted this to happen. Then the CIA spent billions to help overthrown the Ukrainian president in 2014, in order to end its constitutionally entrenched neutrality, leading to the rebellion in the eastern regions by the Russian speakers who didn't want to be ruled by a US-puppet, and Russia's annexation of the Crimea given Russia's fear that their crucial naval base at Sebastopol would be threatened. As for Zelensky supposedly still having a majority approval, I, along with many scholars who know the region well, find that highly doubtful. If so, why did he cancel the presidential election that was supposed to happen? His excuse, that it would be impossible to have one while Ukraine is at war, is not at all convincing since the fighting is only in the disputed eastern largely-Russian-speaking regions that would largely oppose him anyway. Given the amount of lies and propaganda that have been disseminated to justify US support for Ukraine in its disastrous conflict with Russia, the over 1 million Ukrainians who have been killed or seriously maimed fighting what was a completely avoidable war (if not for the USA's insistence that Ukraine join NATO against the repeated explicit warnings by Russia that they would not accept this), and the massive manpower shortages now faced by the Ukrainian military, necessitating the forced impressing of men off the streets, I, and others, have serious doubts that the polls claiming a majority approval for Zelensky are legitimate or should be taken seriously.
As for a referendum in Ukraine on a peace deal between the USA and Russia, since Russia is winning the war, with even the USA acknowledging that the Ukrainian war is, and has always been, a proxy war between the USA and Russia, what Ukrainians think about a peace deal is irrelevant. Either the USA and Russia make a deal that ends the war, or Russia will continue to move further and further west, at least as far as the Dnieper River, Odessa and possibly even Kyiv. The only thing that could stop this from happening, other than a peace deal as soon as possible, is the direct involvement of the US military, which is not going to happen while Trump (or Vance) is president. And if it did happen, it would almost certainly lead to nuclear escalation. So no, what Ukraine or Ukrainians think is unfortunately totally irrelevant to ending this war. The best thing for Ukraine right now, and to stop tens of thousands more of its citizens from being killed or horrible maimed, is to end the war as soon as possible, accepting Russia's demands for the formal ceding of the four eastern oblasts and Crimea to Russia.
I think the easiest way for the USA to solve the problem (annex Canada) is this:
1. Encourage and amplify the anti-American sentiment, really get the Canucks whipped up to defend themselves
2. Spread propaganda that the best way to do this is for Canadians to arm themselves
3. Smuggle in weapons by the trainload
4. Switch the propaganda to anti-Canadian government propaganda, play up the corruption, the degeneracy, the hostility they have towards native Canadians (liberal use of NSA recorded conversations, video, and AI will be instrumental here)
5. Declare the Canadian government to have been taken over by a hostile foreign power (China, India, maybe both)
6. Blockade Canada until it's people liberate themselves from their Mandarin-style Vichy stooges
7. Wait six months and enjoy the show of Canadians politely lynching their former rulers en masse
8. Ink a deal where they become non-represented, mostly self-administering territories, with reduced taxes compared to the 50 states to compensate for lack of representation
They could be fiendish devils and just march in backwards, making the Canadians think they were leaving, at which point they'd go back to doing whatever Canadians do when they're not defending their country and PRESTO! CHANGEO! America's 51st state.
That's been the Russian strategy when invasion is off the table, since Peter the Great was Tsar.
It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.) or the target nation has great cultural-racial cohesion among its populace.
But if those conditions be absent, it works wonderfully well, though the time-scale is generational.
"It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.) or the target nation has great cultural-racial cohesion among its populace."
Looks like a bad time to be a traitorous Canadian politician/oligarch then, because Canadians & Americans have much more in common then either would like to admit, and Canada's cultural & racial cohesion is arguably at an all time low...
Canadians are distinct from Americans, but those differences are much less than the internal differences in Canada (French, English) or in the US (New England, Deep South, Texas).
Yeppers. There's a lot of that sentiment here too, among what passes as nationalists in the North.
Fight for Sweden, the real Sweden? You'll get almost 100% affirmative.
Fight for the regime, for the hordes of ungrateful ****skinned migrants, for woke tranny fairy-tale sessions at libraries and so on? About 13% of conscripts move on to actually do the Värnplikt. Värn = Guard, battlement. Plikt = Duty.
The regime has a real problem, and they know it.
And they deeply fear that allowing the lid off of the racism-pot with regards to Russia/Russians, will back-fire: I've seen it online more and more, people asking:
"Why should I hate the Russians? It's not them that's committing close to 10 000 rapes each year. It's not them costing us over 40 000 000 000:- in permanent welfare each year." And so on.
Friend of mine, much better at getting the point across with little verbiage, coined this descriptor:
"It's like they're playing roulette but with a live grenade instead of a ball"
Because Mannerheim line was broken, Vyborg fell and road to Helsinki open. Duh.
You made a clear statement “It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.)” which is pure speculation. It worked fine with Baltic countries.
As for relative strength of Baltic 9 - do you care to find out? What’s your skin in that game, will you be in front line?
Well in conclusion John, jump up on the side of a tank, hitch up your skirt and wave the Stars and Stripes as the liberators roll north across the border. That’s my genuine recommendation.
The clue that Trump isn’t serious about annexation is that this isn’t the way you go about it, if that’s your goal. Engaging with the Feds is just a waste of time. Trump knows it and is trolling them. If he wants Canada the way to take it is what you pointed out - Alberta. Alberta will come willingly and gladly, like the girl waving her flag on a tank. Then the other provinces can either grovel to join or collapse into irrelevance. The clue is in Trump’s rather odd offer to be the 51st state. Singular. Why not ten states (or thereabouts)? Answer, because he only wants one province. The based one with all the oil. The rest he doesn’t want, so they will need to court him, not the other way around. And he won’t wait for a Colour Revolution. That’s a pussy spook move. The man will just *make a deal*. And if the Canadian Supreme Court or the CAF try to strike the deal down - as you rightly say, who’s got more divisions. (No question mark because it’s not a question.)
I can see how strategically you'd go after Alberta but why wouldn't you want the whole thing if you could take it? You think Alberta is the only place with mineral wealth? How based is Alberta really compared to anywhere else? The mayor of Calgary's a fucking jeet. They had an NDP provincial government not that long ago. Albertans are more racist against frogs and Ontarians than they are against foreigners in my experience.
It's also silly just because that's not how I see annexation playing out, assuming it happens at all. They won't send in the troops. They'll make Canadians demand it.
If President Trump offered a good size land plot for anyone 21 and older, head of a household and stays on lands and develops for 8 years. A land rush.
Patriotism is a tricky thing. It can give the Shitlibs a huge bounce in the polls just as they were headed for the morgue. Or it can move a man who knows and hates everything the Laurentian branch of globohomo stands for, to reach for his guns and point them south across his fence line. I’m adding another anecdotal instance to yours, John.
I have yet to have this conversation with the man I know:
So you’d put your life on the line for those pukes in Ottawa and Toronto who openly despise you? To protect them from the reckoning they’ve got coming? To preserve the woke communist gravy train they sit at the apex of? So they can keep living like kings on the profits of thinking up new ways of calling you a Neanderthal? While you work with your hands to grow the food they eat and build the houses they live in that you can’t possibly afford? You’re going to die in a Predator drone strike holding your 75 year old (Canada-legal) “assault weapon” to shield these globohomo pukes *with your body* from their debt that’s come due because for their whole lives they *fucked around*, at the personal expense of you and all your loved ones, and now (but for your protection), they’re gonna *find out*?
If you post (or perhaps say) anything that someone decides is offensive than the lawfare you (the punishment is in the procedure) so you 2nd mortgage your home and property, and the group of feminist mind-rapers sentence you to castration, naked belly crawl up to the offended person and lick their boots on National TV, and then you formally admit you are like dog-crap and apologize to the offended, and world.
When your child or children are groomed by pedo-women teachers to want sexually mutilation starting with sterilizing hormone disrupters, and change their names to porn stars the groomer suggest, and you still call them by their real names and don't allow them to dress for their delusion .. that Canadian government takes them away, fills them with mind-twisting drugs and sterilization doses of hormones. You get 2 hours to visit and cry for them, and their likely suicide at 19. Will they excuse your knifing to death that Judge? ..
And all that covid tyrannical rules. Forced Satanic poison-injections. Lock-down rules that if you violate they isolate you in a cement cell where you pee in center at drain and poo in bucket. Or whatever whim the guards torture with day-by-day.
They treat you special like President Trump. They lie and damage your reputation and then when you try to defend yourself social-media censor you, and the corp-gov media keeps lying and saying it must be true because you are not denying it.
As an American, I wouldn't want any part of Canada except the Western provinces with oil and gas...and I certainly wouldn't give Canadians the right to vote in American elections...
As to Russia in the Ukraine, it's actually gone pretty well...the price of oil is well up, the professional Russian army hasn't suffered that many casualties, most of the KIA being PMCs and territorial troops...It has been drastically modernized, including become the world leader in EW and drone warfare, as well as hypersonic missiles....all while draining NATO's weapon stocks...Politically, it has strenghted and become the leader of BRICS....It has also become a much closer ally of China...a blunder by the US government...
My assessment of Ukraine as well. It is too bad all of the proxy war pushers who wanted to see what Russia had and could do with it then watch its resources be depleted did not understand thar was a two way street. Oopsies.
Same observations here. Just imagine the 2 new senators from the 51st state - an Indian and Justin. No... just no, please.
And totally agree that poking the Russian bear in the eye was not a clever move. The genius that came up with the idea of forcing US companies out of Russia, and removing Russia from SWIFT should be made a janitor at the zoo.
I wonder if the globalist countries will not just collapse under the strain of immigrants. In Britain the Muslims are very close to a tipping point in vote power. When they stop voting labour and switch to there own, interesting things may happen. As for the youth who will fight, all they've ever known is the liberal world order, this is their world.
We're a little further ahead when it comes to moslems and politics than the UK (Sweden), and what's happened is that as soon as the moslems try to go it their own, as a political party, two hurdles always tumbles them right out the gate:
Islam according to which school?
and
Racial divides.
They try, then they have a great bloody row over which school of islamic jurisprudence is the one true one, and then you get situations where all the arabs in the party vote for the arab, all the turks for the turk and so on, and if the arabs lose they take their ball and go home.
I don't remember which pith-helmeted white man it was that remarked that the peoples from the near-Orient can only really keep peace either when fighting European invaders, or when ruled by European occupying forces, but it seems to still bear out.
The other thing is that, once the Muslims form their own party, the dominant left wing party loses the client group that propped it up, while at the same time the native population finds that it is much less concerned about racism than it used to be, leading to growth of the nativist party.
To answer a posted question on StackExchange about Islam law, women's testimony value I found it very sensible. From women's full value and men's none (for women's issues) to women's none and men's full value.
Considering the studies that reflect Western women's untruthfulness; Parental Fraud of 1/3, False-Rape Accusations over 40%, if we had to set for a single value this year I would suggest 1/10 men's value. Next year re-due studies and when and if they stop being lying whores with pool-man and stop false accusing our sons and brothers to jail, maybe 3/20 of man's testimonial value.
Can not use Islams values for women because in their societies they may stone to death crimes that our Sick cnt-courts reward them for .. stoning courts and law-makers would have to be first step, and at the foot of a hanging rope the lawmakers would pass a Public Pain and Shame punishment for any lies, gossip, broken promises, ... on next Saturday she taken to public park and secure to an anchor and a collar secured to her neck and set the Taser machine for length of sentence, and watch her scream and soil herself for lying.
Same for guys. When 15 or older you pay the wages of sin and be shamed.
Sad, I root for the destruction of my own country. Canada is atrocious, a pathetic pawn in the globalist game which is destroying all human heritage and history in the name of a utopian fantasy. Really nobody is worse.
OK, I agree. I should’ve used the past tense, because Canada is in fact already done as a nation: it’s not happening - it has happened.
I had to look up the meaning of Anschluss - Austria, 1938, annexation into Germany or generally a joinder, connection, unification, political union. Thanks for that, I love a new word.
Is this Aussie Phillip? Isn’t this John Carter fella the bomb, he takes some almighty swings and isn’t afraid to use a cudgel on his subjects.
I haven’t read Nicolo Soldo in months, is he still at it.
Yep, it is me, Down Under. I feel for Canada but fully understand why people feel fed up with it. I'd prefer outright US Occupation to the seedy shit-show of our nominal 'independence'.
JC is very good, a lot of fun to read.
Soldo appears on sabbatical but he is active on X/Twitter.
This is so good!! The only thing I take very slight umbrage with is describing Mark Carney as charismatic. His public speaking is abysmal; his French is worse. He is accustomed to being in charge of a boardroom so when even supportive "journalists" from the Canadian Mockingbird Media ask very obvious questions, Carney gets huffy and refuses to answer.
I dunno. I think he's much more charismatic than Poilievre, who comes across as the annoying kid in the back of the class trying to score points on teacher. Carney comes across as the valedictorian.
Yes, he is *very* thin-skinned, isn't he? There's a current of vulnerability in this man, and a far greater politician than Poilievre would have been able to hone in on it. Instead it's just his Random Slogan Generator trying to upload a new software patch.
Immigration is obviously placing a huge strain on the globalist countries. They're not in a good way.
Behind every human misery stands a central banker.
"Power is either vested in kings or it inevitably ends up with the merchants."
-- Nayib Bukele
Why the merchant class prefers liberal democracy - Academic Agent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jEzmoTcaic
Didn’t he follow up on that quote by saying that merchants inevitably give up power to priests?
"But then I see Chrystia Freeland making deranged statements about deploying British nuclear deterrents on Canadian soil."
Tiny problem with that.
Those nukes are leased from America.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-trident-nuclear-program/
LMAO
These people are retards.
I'm not sure if that's reassuring or even more horrifying
France and USA are the only two western countries that have actual nukes. But France doesn't have good delivery systems: 64 ICBMs total.
The way their demographics are going you can replace ICBMs with "yutes" from the Banlieues.
The UK erm….
UK doesn't have it's own nukes. The warheads it has are on loan from USA and can't be detonated without USA giving the goahead.
UK doesn't have freedom of action when it comes to nuclear weapons. France does.
I actually didn't know this until just recently.
Embarrassing.
It's not true, but I've seen it getting repeated on reddit and in other places. I think she knows France and the UK will never actually agree to cover us in the Nuclear Umbrella but was either yapping to boost the fear of American annexation or actually trying to pressure France a-la Zelensky v Trump/Vance since her announcement came like a day before Macron indicated he would be interested in replacing the US as Europe's Nuclear babysitter.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-confirms-nukes-completely-operationally-independent/
Wrong the Warheads are British.
The Subs are British.
The missles are American.
https://youtu.be/O2Z0Y-mFMBk?si=94aCL-B9hnXRlPA3
So perhaps it is true I got it mixed up. I don’t really have time now to dig into that, partly because it doesn’t change my OG point. UK doesn’t have a domestic nuclear deterrent. Whether it’s the warheads or the missiles that are on loan and need foreign permission to be used, the UK can’t fire when it wants to.
But antichrist isreal has the talpiot plan ..pegasus..candiru.....kill drones .money and expropriated ..filched.tipped off from .....*America"..jewmerica..not real Americans ..and dimona**
Typo ripped off..
"Those people", sadly, inhabit a universe at arms length from anyone's reality.
And they seem determined to drag what's left of Canada into the abyss with them.
They just don't get it we have been watching them destroying our government for 10 years or more tracing tracking phone computer records on everything. God has taken the wheel.
The most clear aspect of Canadian Politics besides the Commie PM is that one of the political parties had a man that won the right to represent that party but Vagina-Supremists wanted the woman to run instead even if she didn't win that party, so - like the kind of lying dishonorable man-destroying inHuman viscous Witch that people wonder if they could throw her off a building an get away with to for safety of self and everyone else, ..
.. So, some woman got to stop suck Satan's Strap-on and false accuse him of rape.
Well, such a clear political vomit move you wonder why that lying horror was not dragged out by a mob and burn at the stake in public, as it was clearly vile woman vomit lies.
If women can have our babies tortured to death unborn on a whim, then dust to anyone that support her murder, but will not allow such a witch burned in public.
He is pressured to step down - some Witch takes his place (if she were not part of the false witness she would not have accepted,) but Stone Her to Death! was not screamed across the country.
If a supposed rape victim does not come forward with in 6 months and later accuses, she should be assumed a life-destroying Witch and .. what you think? Dragged in public while chained together with all the older adults in her blood-line .. erase that bloodline in their screaming? Perhaps?
Yea, Canada, your politics needs a group of 10-gauge shotgun erasers to clean house, then burn your fed. gov. down, perhaps.
Looks like she upped her Adderall/cocaine dosage a notch.
But in whose are they at the moment, is what counts.
And what the lend-leaser is willing to pay to get them back.
True, but without maintenance (techs, spare parts), they become useless except for dirty bombs.
Very true.
I have no clue if the UK of today has the ability to maintain/create nuclear weapons of their own.
I'm only qualified to speculate on it, so to speak, but as I mentioned to Kertch (I think it was Kertch?) over at Eugyppius' the other day, if early 1970s India could manage it, how hard is it really?
I think the delivery system is the bigger issue rather than the actual warheads, but as I said, I'm only qualified to speculate.
On the third hand, the idea of an *EU-nuclear weapon programme* has been broached on the quiet - to me, that seems /more/ dangerous than doing without nuclear weapons, given the typical levels of competence displayed whenever the Union does something as a whole.
India managed it because Canada sold them a nuclear reactor. If they'd had to build a nuclear program from scratch it would have taken them much longer, I suspect.
My understanding is that making them small enough to launch is an issue, e.g. Pakistan has a couple nukes, but I've read they'd need to deliver them via a truck.
India can probably launch a few, but I doubt they have MIRV dial-a-yield weapons.
Yeah, that'd be my guess too, and handing a primed warhead over to suicide bombers with instructions to go blow it and themselves up at the target, well there's so much inbuilt fail in that idea so it's moot too.
The Americans used to have this idea of a nuclear bazooka. Range was shorter than the blast radius, is what I've seen claimed about it.
Sounds like a weapon designed for Japanese soldiers. :)
Do we have intelligence on israeli nuke sizes or development of missile systems, or secrete USA donations?
I suspect that they shipped and trucked them to many major cities throughout world where they sit in a basement or such, ready for false flag, or if they fail to win then set them all off, but more likely the black-mail national leaders.
If you saw any videos of the genociding Gazans that they do, snipers shooting small children in heads, rape-torture prisoners, torture to insanity, .., kill own people to prevent hostage trading, ..
.. do you think such demonic horrors wouldn't plant and set-off nukes?
Would they drink the blood of Christian children, or did I cross a line for those mass murdering psychos, you F-ing .. ? You'll do something about that, sure, while you jerk-off watching them kill 100's with bombs, yes?
Bahahaha
That poor pathetic kid.
He doesn't even realize it was his OWN government that betrayed him and the rest of his country. He doesn't understand that it isn't Trump who's to blame for the current situation, but rather that it's been Canada's political and bureaucratic class - people he and his parents (and maybe his grandparents) have been trusting to 'run the ship' for the last 60 years who put Canada directly in the position it is in now. He clearly has no idea that it was the ineptitude, apathy, avarice, and corruption of the political and senior bureaucrats in Canada over the last several decades that is directly responsible for the predicament in which Canada sits. He may well believe in the trite slogan that "CANADA IS NOT FOR SALE" but is oblivious to the fact that most, if not all, of the people running Canada apparently WERE and STILL ARE for sale.
At some point, the piper was going to have to be paid. Did anyone really think we could pay our own national security and national defence apparatus nothing more than lip service and anything good would come of it? For us or our allies? This young man might not like it, but Trump's grievances on Canada are absolutely correct. At some point, SOMEBODY was going to either point this out, be it Trump or someone else, or SOMEBODY was going to take advantage of this...like, say, China, India, Iran, and others.
The good news is, you're right. This kid, along with many of these other mouthpieces (Leaflibs and Puckstick Patriots - good essay link, by the by) are nothing more than posturing cowards. They wouldn't even stand up for their own rights as they were overtly and blatantly trampled on during the whole scam-demic by a government that made it no secret that they held the entire country in total contempt and derision. It's highly risible to think that they'd put up a fight against the US military, or anyone else for that matter. Besides, what exactly would he intend to use to participate in this 'insurgency', seeing as how pretty much all the firearms in the country were deemed illegal by fiat by the last PM...which he probably also did nothing about.
I tend to agree with you though, John. I don't think Trump is interested in taking Canada by military force at all because he really doesn't have to. Trudeau, and now Carney, have played directly into Trump's hands (either unwittingly or deliberately). Carney will probably win the upcoming election, after which he will carry on as his predecessor did by throwing the screws to the western provinces (particularly Alberta) and turning up the heat. Western alienation and talk of separation is already at an all time high, so it wouldn't be very long at all until Alberta (and maybe Saskatchewan) finally realize that the day will never come where they will ever get a fair shake from Ottawa and the east and decide to take the USA up on it's offer for statehood.
The rest....well, you did a pretty good job of 'wargaming' that possible scenario out in one of your last essays, which was quite well done by the way.
Anyway....just my $0.02 CAD...whatever that's worth today, thanks to inflation and the fact that anyone can post on the internet.
The fact that the puckstick patriots get worked up about American annexation, but yawned as the country was invaded by Indians, is a fatal condemnation of their shallow, performative patriotism.
He sounds like a typical product of Canadian government schools, with contented teacher/civil servant/index pensioned Boomer parents with three annual vacations, lakefront property in the Kawarthas and a place in Florida that they claim they'll get rid of (but won't).
"He doesn't understand that it isn't Trump who's to blame for the current situation, but rather that it's been Canada's political and bureaucratic class..."
Yeah, plenty to criticise there, but it actually is Trump's fault that Trump threatened to annex Canada. Just as it is a perfectly predictable consequence of abandoning Ukraine to its own devices that smaller countries are now contemplating the nuclear deterrent to secure their borders. If you dismantle the Pax Americana, these are the outcomes you can expect.
Except Trump has never actually threatened to annex Canada. Rather, he has said, repeatedly, that Canada would be better off as part of the USA than remaining an independent nation-state. Given how dependent the Canadian economy is on trade with the USA and the likely end of free trade for the foreseeable future, he may well be right.
If I'm misquoting the man, my apologies, but I think my larger point about the risks of dismantling the Pax Americana still hold.
Well, you're the one who claimed that "Trump threatened to annex Canada," which the Liberals, NDP and Canadian media have been saying for months despite, from what I can tell, the lack of evidence that he has ever done so. If you have any quotes that he has, please provide them. It's a convenient fiction, however, because it distracts from what I see as Trump's actual argument—that Canada would be better off as part of the USA—and the long-term mismanagement of Canada by its elites, while arousing a jingoistic anti-American patriotism to help Carney and the Liberals win the upcoming election.
As for the risks of dismantling the Pax Americana, I think you're again missing the point. It's not a question of whether or not to dismantle it because the post-Cold War uni-polar Pax Americana era is over regardless of what anyone in the USA could do. With the rise of China and India and the renewal of Russia, we now live in a multi-polar world. Are there risks attendant to that? Of course! But there are, I'd argue, even greater risks, i.e. World War III, if the USA were to try to pretend otherwise by insisting on trying to continue the global hegemony they once had. That's what provoked the war in Ukraine, the consequences of which have been utterly devastating for that poor country, with well over a million of its citizens killed or seriously wounded and Russia close to realizing the complete collapse of its military.
The North American Union is a New Jew Order scam** trumprat does what satanyahoo tells him to do..with Schwab and finks blessing**
China is due for an impending demographic implosion and India posing a threat to the US on the world stage is fairly laughable. If you're arguing that Russia's military has been pushed to the brink of collapse then the idea that Russia is a serious long-term competitor also doesn't stack up for me.
You're correct that the direct deployment of NATO forces to engage the Russian military might trigger a nuclear exchange, which is why assistance to Ukraine has consisted of humanitarian aid, weapons and logistic support, not troop commitments. But allowing Russia to seize neighbouring countries without sanction would essentially be rewarding the aggressor, and as I already said, there are going to be more nukes in a world without a hegemon, not fewer.
I also don't see that Ukraine has somehow been taken advantage of here. Virtually no-one in the country supported the Russian invasion, and even today Zelensky has a majority approval rating. Try holding a Ukrainian referendum on the 'peace' deal that Trump is proposing and I'm pretty sure it would be shot down.
The Pax Americana is breaking down because the cost of sustaining it is impossible for the US. Free health care for all of you, courtesy of the US for example. We are done being your hog trough.
China certainly has demographic issues, but it also already has a massive population, which even in decline makes it dangerous for US hegemony in Asia. Moreover, because there is a significant gender imbalance in China due to a cultural preference for male children (and widespread use of abortion to have a male child during China's decades-long One-Child policy), the significant number of younger men unable to find a woman to marry makes China MORE dangerous. Having lived in Taiwan, with numerous friends there, I am greatly concerned about the threat of the mainland to it. I would prefer that Taiwan remain independent, de facto if not de jure, but a Chinese invasion, leading to a war between the USA and China, would be a catastrophe, not only for Taiwan but for the world. Given China's determination to unify Taiwan with it, and willingness to use force to make it happen, the best possibility would therefore be some kind of grand bargain between the USA and China to negotiate Taiwan's continued autonomy within an overall Chinese unity.
As for India, a country I've been to twice and traveled through large parts of, no, it won't pose a threat to the USA anytime soon, but again you're missing the point. It is now the world's most populous country and has immense potential, as well as nuclear weapons. It doesn't need to threaten the USA in order to be a factor in realizing a multi-polar world.
Also, I never suggested that Russia's military has been pushed to point of collapse. In fact, its military has gotten much stronger over the last three years. Given its extensive, and hard-earned, battlefield experience fighting in Ukraine and its own Kursk region, it has undoubtedly the most battle-hardened soldiers of any country in the world. And its hypersonic missiles, like the Oreshnik, are not only significantly more advanced than anything the US military has, but neither the US nor the Europeans have anything that can shoot them down. If you don't think that the Russia is not a long-term competitor to the USA, then you haven't been paying attention to what Russia has done over the last ten years to develop its economy and military to make them immune to sanctions by the USA and EU. Russia is winning, and arguably has already won, the war in Ukraine. It's only a matter of time, a few months at most, until the Ukrainian military collapses.
Ukraine absolutely was taken advantage of. You don't know the relevant history. When Bush Jr. insisted in 2008 that Ukraine would join NATO, no one in Ukraine wanted this to happen. Then the CIA spent billions to help overthrown the Ukrainian president in 2014, in order to end its constitutionally entrenched neutrality, leading to the rebellion in the eastern regions by the Russian speakers who didn't want to be ruled by a US-puppet, and Russia's annexation of the Crimea given Russia's fear that their crucial naval base at Sebastopol would be threatened. As for Zelensky supposedly still having a majority approval, I, along with many scholars who know the region well, find that highly doubtful. If so, why did he cancel the presidential election that was supposed to happen? His excuse, that it would be impossible to have one while Ukraine is at war, is not at all convincing since the fighting is only in the disputed eastern largely-Russian-speaking regions that would largely oppose him anyway. Given the amount of lies and propaganda that have been disseminated to justify US support for Ukraine in its disastrous conflict with Russia, the over 1 million Ukrainians who have been killed or seriously maimed fighting what was a completely avoidable war (if not for the USA's insistence that Ukraine join NATO against the repeated explicit warnings by Russia that they would not accept this), and the massive manpower shortages now faced by the Ukrainian military, necessitating the forced impressing of men off the streets, I, and others, have serious doubts that the polls claiming a majority approval for Zelensky are legitimate or should be taken seriously.
As for a referendum in Ukraine on a peace deal between the USA and Russia, since Russia is winning the war, with even the USA acknowledging that the Ukrainian war is, and has always been, a proxy war between the USA and Russia, what Ukrainians think about a peace deal is irrelevant. Either the USA and Russia make a deal that ends the war, or Russia will continue to move further and further west, at least as far as the Dnieper River, Odessa and possibly even Kyiv. The only thing that could stop this from happening, other than a peace deal as soon as possible, is the direct involvement of the US military, which is not going to happen while Trump (or Vance) is president. And if it did happen, it would almost certainly lead to nuclear escalation. So no, what Ukraine or Ukrainians think is unfortunately totally irrelevant to ending this war. The best thing for Ukraine right now, and to stop tens of thousands more of its citizens from being killed or horrible maimed, is to end the war as soon as possible, accepting Russia's demands for the formal ceding of the four eastern oblasts and Crimea to Russia.
Pax Americana is going away.
The only real choice is the easier way, or the harder way.
So you didn’t actually read this piece?
I think the easiest way for the USA to solve the problem (annex Canada) is this:
1. Encourage and amplify the anti-American sentiment, really get the Canucks whipped up to defend themselves
2. Spread propaganda that the best way to do this is for Canadians to arm themselves
3. Smuggle in weapons by the trainload
4. Switch the propaganda to anti-Canadian government propaganda, play up the corruption, the degeneracy, the hostility they have towards native Canadians (liberal use of NSA recorded conversations, video, and AI will be instrumental here)
5. Declare the Canadian government to have been taken over by a hostile foreign power (China, India, maybe both)
6. Blockade Canada until it's people liberate themselves from their Mandarin-style Vichy stooges
7. Wait six months and enjoy the show of Canadians politely lynching their former rulers en masse
8. Ink a deal where they become non-represented, mostly self-administering territories, with reduced taxes compared to the 50 states to compensate for lack of representation
Brilliant.
I'd add some Green Berets just to be sure though.
They could be fiendish devils and just march in backwards, making the Canadians think they were leaving, at which point they'd go back to doing whatever Canadians do when they're not defending their country and PRESTO! CHANGEO! America's 51st state.
Heh.
That's been the Russian strategy when invasion is off the table, since Peter the Great was Tsar.
It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.) or the target nation has great cultural-racial cohesion among its populace.
But if those conditions be absent, it works wonderfully well, though the time-scale is generational.
"It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.) or the target nation has great cultural-racial cohesion among its populace."
Looks like a bad time to be a traitorous Canadian politician/oligarch then, because Canadians & Americans have much more in common then either would like to admit, and Canada's cultural & racial cohesion is arguably at an all time low...
Canadians are distinct from Americans, but those differences are much less than the internal differences in Canada (French, English) or in the US (New England, Deep South, Texas).
Yeppers. There's a lot of that sentiment here too, among what passes as nationalists in the North.
Fight for Sweden, the real Sweden? You'll get almost 100% affirmative.
Fight for the regime, for the hordes of ungrateful ****skinned migrants, for woke tranny fairy-tale sessions at libraries and so on? About 13% of conscripts move on to actually do the Värnplikt. Värn = Guard, battlement. Plikt = Duty.
The regime has a real problem, and they know it.
And they deeply fear that allowing the lid off of the racism-pot with regards to Russia/Russians, will back-fire: I've seen it online more and more, people asking:
"Why should I hate the Russians? It's not them that's committing close to 10 000 rapes each year. It's not them costing us over 40 000 000 000:- in permanent welfare each year." And so on.
Friend of mine, much better at getting the point across with little verbiage, coined this descriptor:
"It's like they're playing roulette but with a live grenade instead of a ball"
They need to pull the pin on the grenade to defend themselves, it's their only option, but there's only one problem: the grenade hates them.
Finland surrendered after 3 months, update your sources.
Here's a poser for you: /why/ did Finland agree to sue for peace when they did?
And the bonus question: What was the actual Soviet plan, and at what cost did their victory come? Compare it to the cost to Finland.
Bonus question: What is the relative strength of the Baltic 9 today, and Russia, and what was the force-relation between the USSR and Finland in 1941?
You might be graded on your answer.
Because Mannerheim line was broken, Vyborg fell and road to Helsinki open. Duh.
You made a clear statement “It doesn't work well when there's a great cultural-racial divide (Russia-Finland f.e.)” which is pure speculation. It worked fine with Baltic countries.
As for relative strength of Baltic 9 - do you care to find out? What’s your skin in that game, will you be in front line?
It’s a multiple choice with book open.
Well in conclusion John, jump up on the side of a tank, hitch up your skirt and wave the Stars and Stripes as the liberators roll north across the border. That’s my genuine recommendation.
The clue that Trump isn’t serious about annexation is that this isn’t the way you go about it, if that’s your goal. Engaging with the Feds is just a waste of time. Trump knows it and is trolling them. If he wants Canada the way to take it is what you pointed out - Alberta. Alberta will come willingly and gladly, like the girl waving her flag on a tank. Then the other provinces can either grovel to join or collapse into irrelevance. The clue is in Trump’s rather odd offer to be the 51st state. Singular. Why not ten states (or thereabouts)? Answer, because he only wants one province. The based one with all the oil. The rest he doesn’t want, so they will need to court him, not the other way around. And he won’t wait for a Colour Revolution. That’s a pussy spook move. The man will just *make a deal*. And if the Canadian Supreme Court or the CAF try to strike the deal down - as you rightly say, who’s got more divisions. (No question mark because it’s not a question.)
Stay free, brother.
One doesn't wait for a color revolution. One makes it happen. That's what makes it distinct from an actual revolution.
Ok. That also works.
I can see how strategically you'd go after Alberta but why wouldn't you want the whole thing if you could take it? You think Alberta is the only place with mineral wealth? How based is Alberta really compared to anywhere else? The mayor of Calgary's a fucking jeet. They had an NDP provincial government not that long ago. Albertans are more racist against frogs and Ontarians than they are against foreigners in my experience.
The mayor of Edmonton is also a jeet.
Saskatchewan would probably want to go too.
Johnny Banger for Prime Minster. Your sanpaku-eyed compatriot has AIDS: American Invasion Derangement Syndrome.
It's also silly just because that's not how I see annexation playing out, assuming it happens at all. They won't send in the troops. They'll make Canadians demand it.
Idk the thought of rolling my Bradley into Calgary is pretty appealing.
You have a personal Bradley?
Unfortunately it belongs to the guard. Someday though. Someday I will be a post American warlord.
As the founders intended.
Start with Toronto first please. Like, *please*.
Just shell it until it's rubble.
Is there a lot of public land there?
If President Trump offered a good size land plot for anyone 21 and older, head of a household and stays on lands and develops for 8 years. A land rush.
"Bring weapons to defend from hostile Gov."
89% of Canada is what's called Crown land, or public land to Americans. It's not habitable though, and of course there's no road to get to it.
Patriotism is a tricky thing. It can give the Shitlibs a huge bounce in the polls just as they were headed for the morgue. Or it can move a man who knows and hates everything the Laurentian branch of globohomo stands for, to reach for his guns and point them south across his fence line. I’m adding another anecdotal instance to yours, John.
I have yet to have this conversation with the man I know:
So you’d put your life on the line for those pukes in Ottawa and Toronto who openly despise you? To protect them from the reckoning they’ve got coming? To preserve the woke communist gravy train they sit at the apex of? So they can keep living like kings on the profits of thinking up new ways of calling you a Neanderthal? While you work with your hands to grow the food they eat and build the houses they live in that you can’t possibly afford? You’re going to die in a Predator drone strike holding your 75 year old (Canada-legal) “assault weapon” to shield these globohomo pukes *with your body* from their debt that’s come due because for their whole lives they *fucked around*, at the personal expense of you and all your loved ones, and now (but for your protection), they’re gonna *find out*?
You forgot the bank account lock-out.
If you post (or perhaps say) anything that someone decides is offensive than the lawfare you (the punishment is in the procedure) so you 2nd mortgage your home and property, and the group of feminist mind-rapers sentence you to castration, naked belly crawl up to the offended person and lick their boots on National TV, and then you formally admit you are like dog-crap and apologize to the offended, and world.
When your child or children are groomed by pedo-women teachers to want sexually mutilation starting with sterilizing hormone disrupters, and change their names to porn stars the groomer suggest, and you still call them by their real names and don't allow them to dress for their delusion .. that Canadian government takes them away, fills them with mind-twisting drugs and sterilization doses of hormones. You get 2 hours to visit and cry for them, and their likely suicide at 19. Will they excuse your knifing to death that Judge? ..
And all that covid tyrannical rules. Forced Satanic poison-injections. Lock-down rules that if you violate they isolate you in a cement cell where you pee in center at drain and poo in bucket. Or whatever whim the guards torture with day-by-day.
They treat you special like President Trump. They lie and damage your reputation and then when you try to defend yourself social-media censor you, and the corp-gov media keeps lying and saying it must be true because you are not denying it.
Dammit, this is great writing. Kudos. So many quotable sentences, I lost count. Substack needs a highlight tool!
Cheers, man.
I've developed the habit of having a tab with Notepad open on it, so I can quote-mine while reading.
However, one runs the danger of writing responses almost to the length of the article...
As an American, I wouldn't want any part of Canada except the Western provinces with oil and gas...and I certainly wouldn't give Canadians the right to vote in American elections...
As to Russia in the Ukraine, it's actually gone pretty well...the price of oil is well up, the professional Russian army hasn't suffered that many casualties, most of the KIA being PMCs and territorial troops...It has been drastically modernized, including become the world leader in EW and drone warfare, as well as hypersonic missiles....all while draining NATO's weapon stocks...Politically, it has strenghted and become the leader of BRICS....It has also become a much closer ally of China...a blunder by the US government...
My assessment of Ukraine as well. It is too bad all of the proxy war pushers who wanted to see what Russia had and could do with it then watch its resources be depleted did not understand thar was a two way street. Oopsies.
Same observations here. Just imagine the 2 new senators from the 51st state - an Indian and Justin. No... just no, please.
And totally agree that poking the Russian bear in the eye was not a clever move. The genius that came up with the idea of forcing US companies out of Russia, and removing Russia from SWIFT should be made a janitor at the zoo.
I came for the Hindu colonization reports from Prince Edward Island but stayed for the fever dream. Really great post. Substack needs a tip system.
Very thin country huddled along the border with the USA. The Abrams will just Thunder Run Ottawa and it will be all over in 72hrs atm.
72 hours? You can drive to Ottawa from the nearest border crossing in an hour. It would be over before lunch.
The other Ukraine connection is of course, Canada's large Ukrainian population (including Freeland herself).
After Ukraine loses, all those vets will need somewhere to go...
I thought about mentioning this, but honestly not that relevant here imo. They've been here for generations.
I wonder if the globalist countries will not just collapse under the strain of immigrants. In Britain the Muslims are very close to a tipping point in vote power. When they stop voting labour and switch to there own, interesting things may happen. As for the youth who will fight, all they've ever known is the liberal world order, this is their world.
We're a little further ahead when it comes to moslems and politics than the UK (Sweden), and what's happened is that as soon as the moslems try to go it their own, as a political party, two hurdles always tumbles them right out the gate:
Islam according to which school?
and
Racial divides.
They try, then they have a great bloody row over which school of islamic jurisprudence is the one true one, and then you get situations where all the arabs in the party vote for the arab, all the turks for the turk and so on, and if the arabs lose they take their ball and go home.
I don't remember which pith-helmeted white man it was that remarked that the peoples from the near-Orient can only really keep peace either when fighting European invaders, or when ruled by European occupying forces, but it seems to still bear out.
The other thing is that, once the Muslims form their own party, the dominant left wing party loses the client group that propped it up, while at the same time the native population finds that it is much less concerned about racism than it used to be, leading to growth of the nativist party.
To answer a posted question on StackExchange about Islam law, women's testimony value I found it very sensible. From women's full value and men's none (for women's issues) to women's none and men's full value.
Considering the studies that reflect Western women's untruthfulness; Parental Fraud of 1/3, False-Rape Accusations over 40%, if we had to set for a single value this year I would suggest 1/10 men's value. Next year re-due studies and when and if they stop being lying whores with pool-man and stop false accusing our sons and brothers to jail, maybe 3/20 of man's testimonial value.
Can not use Islams values for women because in their societies they may stone to death crimes that our Sick cnt-courts reward them for .. stoning courts and law-makers would have to be first step, and at the foot of a hanging rope the lawmakers would pass a Public Pain and Shame punishment for any lies, gossip, broken promises, ... on next Saturday she taken to public park and secure to an anchor and a collar secured to her neck and set the Taser machine for length of sentence, and watch her scream and soil herself for lying.
Same for guys. When 15 or older you pay the wages of sin and be shamed.
Sad, I root for the destruction of my own country. Canada is atrocious, a pathetic pawn in the globalist game which is destroying all human heritage and history in the name of a utopian fantasy. Really nobody is worse.
I am 61 and surprised that it has come to this.
It fell apart very quickly, though the rot set in long ago.
Rot attributable to the father and Justin finished us off.
The destruction has already happened. Trudeau and Freeland etc were responsible.
Orange Man is the best chance for an American/Canadian Anschluss (apologies for the analogy, but the expression is too good not to use).
OK, I agree. I should’ve used the past tense, because Canada is in fact already done as a nation: it’s not happening - it has happened.
I had to look up the meaning of Anschluss - Austria, 1938, annexation into Germany or generally a joinder, connection, unification, political union. Thanks for that, I love a new word.
Is this Aussie Phillip? Isn’t this John Carter fella the bomb, he takes some almighty swings and isn’t afraid to use a cudgel on his subjects.
I haven’t read Nicolo Soldo in months, is he still at it.
I've been jokingly referring to this as Anglo Anschluss for a while.
Soldo is still writing, yes!
Canschluss.
Nice
Soldo has been silent since feb17 🤔
Yep, it is me, Down Under. I feel for Canada but fully understand why people feel fed up with it. I'd prefer outright US Occupation to the seedy shit-show of our nominal 'independence'.
JC is very good, a lot of fun to read.
Soldo appears on sabbatical but he is active on X/Twitter.
Cool. Lyon’s nailed it with the “strong gods” piece. What do you think?
Nicolo has gone quiet since feb17, I hope he is okay
Have been frustrated by the silence. So much has happened in the last few weeks. Writing can be very demanding. Presumably he is taking a break.
This is so good!! The only thing I take very slight umbrage with is describing Mark Carney as charismatic. His public speaking is abysmal; his French is worse. He is accustomed to being in charge of a boardroom so when even supportive "journalists" from the Canadian Mockingbird Media ask very obvious questions, Carney gets huffy and refuses to answer.
I dunno. I think he's much more charismatic than Poilievre, who comes across as the annoying kid in the back of the class trying to score points on teacher. Carney comes across as the valedictorian.
Yes, he is *very* thin-skinned, isn't he? There's a current of vulnerability in this man, and a far greater politician than Poilievre would have been able to hone in on it. Instead it's just his Random Slogan Generator trying to upload a new software patch.