Trump's campaign was also given a substantial boost by several thuggish acts by the Regime during the election...including the intentional denial of hurricane relief, which lost North Carolina, the harassment of Amish milk producers selling raw milk (which is more nutritious) causing 150,000 new Amish voters to register for the 1st time, and the armed raid on an animal resuer, with the purpose of murdering Peanut the squirrel, who was popular on TikTok...Squirrel memes were everywhere...
It was also helped by the verbal abilities of Vance, Musk and Vivek, who repeatedly made mincemeat of hostile interviewers.....
They need to. But they won't. They rarely do. The left is much more diligent about chasing down and exterminating opposition than the right/center ever has been or ever will be.
As a chemist I look at things from a thermodynamic vantage.
Your mention of the Nordstream "sabotage" is relevant. I enjoyed Seymour Hersh's appreciation of the event.
In tonight's reading I note that the Norwegians are annoyed at the cost of wind power from Denmark and Germany and may "cut the cord."
Your sense that Germany in particular has been deindustrialised by the Green energy stupidity is apropos.
Energy equals wealth (and power) and France has maintained control of energy production.
We await the American outcome of the third? coming of "Drill, baby, drill!" It won't be as productive as the previous results for geophysical reasons but may support the recovery of a certain ability to exert power.
Finally, why would you doubt the exercise of bureaucratic stupidity?
All the Regimes across the West are desperate. They know that if they lose political influence it won't just be that they're not getting reelected any time soon, it'll be that they're not getting jobs anywhere. I don't want my hamburger served to me by some employee with blue hair who used to work for the State Health Board.
It was impossible to elect the Democrats. The silence the day after the election and the bow out by Harris (the only classy moment I can remember from her) makes me think the cabal got their man in. I just can't stop thinking about the assassination attempt on Trump. How all of them are members of the actor's guild. All of them. Thomas Crooks, Ashley Babbitt, Donald Trump, every face they let us see is under contract. Trumps bodyguards were actors. They didn't care how fake it seemed live, they just wanted that money shot for the campaign. Why does Donald Trump look younger than he did eight years ago? It's theater. Remember when Trump read the snake story? "You knew I was a snake when you let me in?" WTF?
I love this, yes. We're on a countdown, the signs of it are everywhere if one knows what to look for - in to and beyond the carefully curated theatre.
"The elite will not address these problems because it is the elite causing these problems, which the elite is doing because it is profiting from them."
Deep-define the el-lite: all you will get is Time, Saturn, El.
One can stare goggle-eyed at what is happening outside in the global theatre, or get the soul in order. It might sound "religious", but it's not - it's metaphysic reality.
You're ignoring all his actions when he was President. Such as the EOS. His actions against the Zionists in Israel. It's difficult. We've been in prison a long time and sometimes it's hard to see that freedom might be near.
Well, he had to appear to be loyalist. His actions will prove his loyalty. Remember Operation Warp Speed? He's pro-vax despite all the death and sickness caused by the military countermeasures from the DOD? He is going to move us to a gold backed CDBC, and save the financial world. For a time, you'll be able to trade your bankster-hundos for this new electronic currency. Everyone is going to say that he's a hero. The only catch will be that you've got to be vaxxed and tracked to participate in the new economy. The entire globalist agenda will continue to roll out. All the federal land grabs (agenda 21) will continue. The biosecurity state (agenda 30) will continue its progress. Look, it's that or Kamala Harris and the tranny blue-hairs (unelectable). Do you see that it's a false choice? Everyone got funneled into supporting Trump, who did Operation Warp Speed, who has prayed at the Eastern Wall with his Kippah on, and who is to Jared Kushner as Hillary Clinton was to Huma Abadin.
Operation Warp Speed was uncovered by intensive anon research where it was discovered that the cabal had been planning something far nastier than what occurred - millions dead by the jab. Trump actually forced them to move faster than what they had originally planned. A lot of the jabs were placebos. However, while they didn’t have enough of the death jabs, they did have enough to target red states where one can look up number of deaths.
Everything that they had planned was upset by Hillary not getting elected and Trump moving their depopulation faster than they wanted. However, none of this will convince you, obviously. But, if you were paying attention, you may have noticed that certain things happened immediately upon his election. The migrant caravan at the US border dissolved, China wants to work peacefully with the US, the EU will switch from buying oil from Russia to buying oil from the US and there’s a lot more. Essentially, various countries and continents signalled that they prefer Trump and started to work on their problems, which was predicted by the anons. Cascade effect.
Not going to argue this anymore. Just continue to watch and observe.
If you don't argue, you lose. You left the field of battle, which according to the rules of conduct of warfare, means you lose. I'm just kidding. I think you're influenced too much by Mossad propaganda. I wish you were right, and if it turns out that Trump is the incarnation of Saint Jermaine, is the rightful King of England, is a time traveler who owns all the inventions of Nicola Tesla, and is the legitimate hero humanity deserves, I will happily join team Trump. Trump literally works for the corporate entity that runs the USA on a for-profit basis. He's 100% a theater actor.
Dang, it’s odd getting a measured intelligent response. It really is. Believe me, I have my doubts as well. For me, something I have said before bears repeating: A lot of what I’ve figured out doesn’t come from Trump, but the anons who started eight years ago. For me personally, it started after 9-11. Been in it a bit long. It was always the anons. Trump? Definitely a central character. But it’s the people.
Always.
I noticed in all this research I was doing that things were happening that I had never seen before. CEO’s in droves stepping down. 900,000 sealed indictments. Most of the mid-east switchng from US fiat currency to their own system, and one not controlled by the central banks. Entire global banks simply dissolving. It sure looks like the old power structure is going down. Odd little things like the once mighty ADL no longer as powerful. They had successfully sued Elon for a few billion, and managed to get some agents placed in X, and so far, their reach is limited. It’s not total free speech there, but it sure is a lot more free speech. Or in the news - haven’t heard Bilderger meeting anything, where talk of black budgets was yearly and discussed at length, now non-existent. And so much more.
While I hope whatever new is coming in isn’t straight up evil and so I write optimistically about that, I don’t know until it happens and goes one way or the other but I do see that the old power structure is crumbling.
Interesting theory, let's see how it plays out...More likely IMO is that a lot of the big money awakened to the threat that a Kamala presidency would lead to total disaster..
"The British people themselves will hardly be oblivious to events beyond their borders, and when other people are getting nice things – for instance, governments that actually represent their interests – there’s a strong tendency to want those things for yourself"
Who would have guessed that law and order and national sovereignty will be for the British in 2026 what Levi's jeans and Marlboros were to Eastern Bloc denizens in 1986. Similar dynamics, hopefully similar outcomes. I've said elsewhere that there's a late-Soviet, Eric Honecker-on-the-balcony vibe going on. And like that period, one by one, they all fell, as they must here.
And in terms of Kompromat, every time I see Ursula Van der Leyen I'm convinced that off-hours she's the dominatrix at de Sade-level orgies amongst the degenerate Eurotrash "elite" that will make Diddy's Freak Offs look like a Rotary Club barbeque.
I truly hope Trump and/or Vance are transformational figures, otherwise Putin might as well let 'er rip because otherwise I can't see any other form of purge-renewal taking place.
She recently helped a fellow passenger on a plane she was travelling on, on the way back from Rio and the G20 summit, since she is - believe it or not - an accredited MD.
I loathe her as a politician and see her as an enemy of the people, but this was surprising human act of her.
I suppose when it's a real human in need in front of her, and not just statistics on a graph-paper, she actually has some empathy?
Maybe, or perhaps it was more performative and strategic, as in she saw a possible headline: Passenger falls ill on same flight as accredited MD Van Der Leyen; Criticised for her inaction.
There are three theories as to why the cheat was ineffective. 1. too big to rig. 2. Republican countermeasures worked. 3. they didn't dial it up to 11 this time. Not because they were reconciled to Trump but because they wanted to get rid of Harris. Governors of both MI and PA have Presidential ambitions and Harris was in the way. Probably a combination of all three.
There's a theory the USA is going to blow in the next 4 years. I've been tracking the unbacked money-printing by the FED, and it keeps on going. I don't exactly know if they're trapped or not, if the disorder is irreversible or not, but if this continues, the hyperinflation of the US dollar is inevitable... and why would Democrats want to be on the helm when that happens? Instead, they blame Trump/Republicans and start a violent uprising.
The elites aren’t a monolith. Elon and Rogan siding with Trump was the official signal that the shitlib elites were declaring war on the progressive elites. The results don’t conflict with elite theory at all unless one incorrectly assumes that elites don’t experience intra-group competition.
You touched on it, but perhaps underplayed the importance of the Zionist sect of the elites. They are the dominant donor class of the militant American left and without their dollars, there were no bricks to throw or busses full of activists to show up and riot.
Peter Turchin stressed that elite overproduction was one MAJOR factor in the age of discord. When there are more players than musical chair, they’ll gore each other’s eyes out, as seen in the Roman civil wars, Japanese wars for shogunate, War of Roses, etc. No group, elite or pleb, are ever monolithic. Not even the Communists or China or Israel.
This is why it’s a mistake to be a doomer, the cracks are always there. Just have to dig in and listen and then try to break the enemy unity by stressing their differences. America’s Indian wars was successful because we were able to play the Creeks off against Sioux and so forth. We wanted to do likewise with the Arabs, Hispanics, and others to create space for ourselves. But it take a ruthless will to do so. Don’t obsess over the numbers. Pick a battle that play to your strengths.
I'm still leaning towards the "Trump is going to piss away every opportunity just like last time" camp, but optimistic outlooks like yours and Jeff Childers's are giving me hope. Thank you. Maybe the assassination attempts were a "come to Jesus" moment for him, as some have suggested.
We'll see what happens. The team surrounding him is much better than it was before, which is the main cause for optimism imo. However, many need to be confirmed by the Senate. That may and probably will lead to some unwelcome changes.
"The balance of evidence doesn’t really suggest that Trump was chosen by the elite, so much as that the elite reluctantly came to terms with the fact that, after they’d thrown everything they had at him – relentless defamation, lawfare, assassination attempts – they’d gotten outplayed, were going to lose"
Are unaware that Trump had the support of right wing zionist since 2016? He even had more support since 10/7. Or do you not consider Zionists part of the elite?
There was nothing reluctant about Miriam Adelsons 100 million...but she's a white hat. 🙄 Right?
But Trump was clearly chosen by most of the elites, or the elite faction with the most power, that's why there is no real resistance; no real protest, no accusations of Russian interference, positive coverage on corporate media and right wing zionist are creaming their pants.
So many people on the DR are framing Trumps win as some kind of loss to the power structure. I see no "oh well, we wanted Harris, but we are stuck we Trump".
He very clearly wasn't chosen by most of the elites, or their media would have fallen in behind them (they didn't), and he would have raised more money than Kamala (he didn't).
Trump might be onboard with the idea of a stronger Europe, but the American oligarchs on either side of the Uniparty Corporation most certainly wants all of Europe to be kept down, for the simple reason that we (could and would) offer real competition, and as one of Saints of Capitalism said: "Competition is a Sin".
Further, a resurgence or even a second Renaissance would mean a complete scorched earth-capmpaign against US entertaintment media: Hollywood was after all founded by whom as what, you know, and for a an explicit purpose.
Personally, I think it is high time for a divorce. America is its own nation, and will barring actions which are un-American and politically impossible become a huge Zimbabwe-Venezuela: the odds of that are actually greater than EUrope going that route, for two reasons:
Demographic shift via migration and birth-rates, that same old tune, and:
Just as individuals do, cultures too revert to type. How will USA look when WASPs and other "whites" are 1/3 of the population?
And one other thing, not noticeable from the outside:
The very boring - and to many Americans and English-in-exile colonials scary - trait that makes us (Teutons, Angles, Saxons, et cetera) seem to always have the same opinion as were we a collective being?
I've been saying this for years. Scandinavians in particular are a consensus society. When the consensus shifts it is abrupt and total. The next consensus will be “get them all out, now, we don't care how.”
Regarding US and Europe, a relationship as competitive frenemies is preferable to the existing state. Iron sharpens iron. Monopolists might not want competition, but these are the conditions that move civilization forward.
If you look at all of Europe's most culturally fruitful eras (and we can neglect the rest of the world because, well, it just isn't important), it was always during periods of disunity and intensive competition.
"Dare to be brave" is a slogan that would play better here than 'MEGA' since MAGA ranks just below "Hello Victory" (in German) in the EU.
It is vague enough, yet clear enough, and it allows precisely the space to pivot that must be allowed our entrenched elites - pikes in pond-mentality and all - to turn and play at being leader.
Here's something interesting: spoke to a busdriver today, he asked tentatively what my take on the proposed re-establishment of prison ships in Sweden.
"Shoot them if they have done rape, arson, murder or repeated violent offences" said I, continuing "and if they are migrants, erect gallows at every border crossing and hang the bodies up for the crows."
Instead of looking at me as an escaped loon, he actually thought it over and we had a half-hour long conversation on the wider topic of crime, migrations and how to handle convicted felons.
Ten years ago, such a forthright conversation would not have happened. Maybe, just maybe, that's an Omen that the Spinner's threads are about to form a new pattern.
“You know,” thought the bus driver, as he thought about the grenade attacks, the rapes, the constant vandalism, the brown-skinned youth gangs lurking about the streets selling drugs, harassing women, and menacing law-abiding citizens, “This right wing maniac has a good point.”
The Greeks beat Persia because they were fighting each other for so long that even Athens could kick their asses despite not being as big. It’s one thing to have the numbers. It’s another thing to have an army that is very spirited, experienced, and can invent on the fly. It’s not a guarantee, but it’s an important factor.
Even Afghans beat War Street Empire after 20 years! They were just as competitive as the Greeks 2,000 years ago.
China tends to be the most creative when divided into the Warring States. They can innovate but only when there are a lot of warlords to give them the permission.
English school children will be a minority in the classroom by 2031. Each year the replacement is accelerating. That is the blackest of black pills. What will be left of the West then?
And as you alluded to, albeit obliquely, we are still British, and still a warlike people under it all. Many still imagine they can vote their way out. Once it sinks in we may see a different vibe.
As for "warlike people", I'd like to remind you that British didn't rebel in 3 centuries. And even before that they scarcely had rebellions. Doesn't sound "warlike" to me. Yes, they were very renown pirates and plunderers, but that's all warfare that happens in somebody else's land, far away from home. War is completely a different affair if you don't know if your wife and children have been raped, killed, or your house burned down.
No it won't. It will initially be against the imports, who are not ourselves despite the very best attempts of the media to rebrand people as New Canadians, New Germans etc.
The tension is normal because different peoples occupying the same territory causes conflict. So what happens when one group understand the territory as their homeland, the only homeland they possess?
I am not an advocate for war or violence, but given how unpopular mass immigration is politics is failing and more are noticing. Look at the Irish.
Not much. As Mark Steyn says, the future belongs to those who show up. In Canada, we can see that happening in Toronto suburbs, where formerly white towns and cities are now almost completely transformed into Arab and South Asian enclaves, with all the diverse fun that brings: imported ethnic conflicts, sword fights in mall parking lots, massive increases in car and home robberies, fraud, slum-like housing, sprawl, horrific traffic, and the infiltration and infestation of every political, cultural and educational institution. The remaining whites are now literally ex-pats in their own countries whose concerns aren't listened to, at all, by their new Sikh and Muslim overlords.
Good tour of the horizon. As you note and Zhou Enlai famously said "It's too soon to tell". I would favor a policy of benign neglect toward Europe unless the regimes there threaten our interests like trying to shut down Musk, then whack them in some appropriate way. Wait to see if the populist revolutionaries succeed and then do bilateral deals. If enough of them succeed, then see if they want to band together. With the US out, they will really have the choice between Russia and Islam. If they want the US back, they have to change.
The UK is a special problem because of the long lease on life of the crazies. We should terminate Five Eyes and make it clear that the Special Relationship is over. Beyond that, watch them collapse and consider running guns by private parties as once happened with Ireland (which is currently crazier than the UK). Keep the regime locked up in London and other big cities.
Very likely all Trump has to do to destabilize European governments is “nothing at all”, but more aggressive measures would certainly hasten the process.
If the US was to act against the EU when Trump is in office, all it would do is galvanise people to fall in line with their respective national regimes.
The reason for this is as stupid as it is simple:
The US is perceived as a "white" nation, and is therefore "legal" to show public dislike for.
Best thing would be if Trump indeed did nothing when it comes to USA-EU relations, and focused on getting the USA back on the right track. Succeeding in deporting criminals, righting the economy, and cleaning out mandated racism, sexism and such (DEI) plus cleaning house with the acronym-agencies would cause our leaders to start emulating his actions.
This is why the specific actions I suggest are essentially a) do nothing, just withdraw support, b) weaponize social media, which largely amounts to ensuring Europeans have a platform for open discourse, and maybe c) occasional carefully timed releases, via deniable leaks, of damaging information.
Trump openly endorsing parties or leaders would probably be politically toxic.
I would borrow a page from the Communist International and do quiet support through private parties with capital, logistics, training. Like it or not, they were excellent teachers to learn from in many things. Disdaining to learn from them is as stupid as keep playing the Globalists’ “rasssssist” games.
Funny thing is that increasing number of Indians and Africans whose visas have expired, and who *should* be deported, have all of a sudden discovered they're gay and bisexual and are applying for - and will most likely receive - asylum on that basis.
Canada is now officially the immigration equivalent of a construction site port-a-potty, and unlike the US, there is no mainstream politician advocating for mass deportations. The cheap labour and fake GDP growth is just too enticing to our oligopolistic elites.
The Anals are a problem. We need a heat sink to drain them out, and the best solution is some kind of Robert Heinlein’s Coventry. It’s an island cut off from the world where all the neverdowells go to do as they will. Make it a reservation for the Anals and they’ll go there expecting fun and freedom but finding hell that they can’t escape from. And they’ll only have themselves to blame.
I honesty hope Trump rains holy hell down on us, we deserve it. Hopefully that will convince Trudeau to retire and disappear, and his whole fetid government with him.
Ah, you are Canadian. All Trump would have to do is prohibit health tourism by Canadians. That would collapse your national health service by tieing down the pressure valve.
He doesn't have to do a thing, it's collapsing under the sheer weight of an additional 7-8 million people arriving in Canada since 2020. I've seen some estimates that Canada might have up to 55 million people currently living here even though the official estimate is around 43 million. Were Trump to do that, Canadian healthcare would probably degrade to a level of a developing country, *very* quickly. If you walk into an ER in Brampton, Ontario, or Surrey, BC, it's already there.
Nobody should be allowed to threaten our legitimate interests. Legitimate interests do not include telling other countries how to live or being Globocop.
The term "legitimate interests" raises hackles on any non-American due to the USA's well-known history of interpreting that phrase as it having ownership and control over the natural resources of other nations, and a right to restrict trade to and from any nation it so chooses, even if it is trade between third parties not involving the USA in any way.
A step back from that would be most welcome, and something which would endear Trump to many leaders around the world.
I think it is safe to assume that the peoples of the USA and Europe both are in agreement on this, and that the various firebrands chucked about from our leadership-castes ("Warmongering Ameritards" vs "Freeloading Eurotrash" and other such nonsense) are intended to prevent a popular surge for peace and free trade and free competition as well as spontaneous co-peration on common issues.
Why must we assume that the current elites are the actual elites? The new media (counter culture) celebs/elites did more to help Trump than we give them credit for. In this attention society, guys like Rogan, Theo Von, the Nelk Boys, Tim Dillon, Brett Weinstein, Tony Hinchcliffe, Dana White, Jordan Peterson, etc. all platformed (in some way) Trump and/or his team to their massive audiences who trust their creators. These elites in some way have fully subverted not only traditional media but have attained the public trust due to honesty.
If you can in some ways successfully influence the public in a democracy, are you not the true elite?
Not to defend Macron, but Marine is not a populist leader but more a McCain, Obama or Poilievre. The actual populist options are Aselineau, Bardella and Marion (Marine’s niece).
True, though Aselineau has faced ‘hate-crime charges’ or whatever and is banned I believe from politics, Bardella was the populist choice for Prime Minister but was blocked and is having to appeal to the EU and Orban for assistance last I checked. And as to Marion as she enjoys enormous support from all ‘right wing factions’ as heiress of the Le Pen family, if her aunt falls likely they’ll come after her next.
And one of the biggest populist figure in some circles Jean Capet who had begun to with the farmers’ protests become a viable alternative has been imprisoned in his home, stripped of his properties and is facing lawfare. Not trying to be too disagreeable John, I just didn't used to trust Marine, though that said I don't think she should have lawfare done against her. This is as you noted clearly another attack against a populist French figure following after Bock-Cote, Aselineau, & Son Majesté Jean IV and now Marine.
I wonder what it is about these potential successors of DeGaulle that frightens the Regime so much? Surely, with France surrounded they should feel at ease. I mean they control her nuclear-submarines, her warships and have NATO bases, and yet they keep attacking her potential leaders more it seems than English, German, Italian or Spanish ones. It really boggles my mind.
Hope so, I’m French-Canadian and though biased towards France, Germany and Japan are bigger economies, Spain and Italy are more hot-tempered ordinarily and Britain was a former Empire.
So I always figured going after them makes more sense, but the prophecy angle might explain it. These Democrats likely believe it and don’t want to take the risk of France slipping out from their fingertips. And give Quebec, French-Africa, Vietnam all want to go back to being colonies and Japan has a huge French diaspora and is one of the capitals of the Francophone Association of Asia I believe they’re tied into French interests (looked it up after the post).
That is a lot of optimism about Trump's second term!
I voted for Trump, and I'm happy he won, but I would be pleasantly surprised if even a tenth of it happens. Well, except for the part about Europe stepping up its military spending - the need for that is so obvious at this point that it may well have happened under a Harris presidency.
John Carter's basic description of the problem is sound... Europe really has been weakened even more than the "imperial core"... I am just doubtful that Europe's right will find more effective leaders than Marine Le Pen and Eric Zemmour and Rishi Sunak and (facepalms) Liz Truss to advance their cause. Those people weren't able to handle the problem - so who is waiting in the wings?
He could end it quickly by pulling the plug on Ukraine. No real leverage on Russia There would be a domestic price but does he care. Best solution is ceasefire in place with new borders there. Perhaps a trade of Ukranian help territory around Kursk. Partially lifting sanctions. No NATO. Rebuilding aid
Make EU pay. Russia pays for Donbas. Some sort of security guarantee for Ukraine. EU?Peacekeeper s along borders. India? Get rid of indictments for Russians and Israelis. Clip wings of ICC.
You're pretty close actually. I've predicted in my own substack how Trump needs to deal with China and Canada. Tariffs will be applied to Canada. He'll go tough on Canada's den of vipers, the Grits and Tories (NDP will just flail and die). As for deportation, he has to talk to China. China moves fent and people through SA and Canada. For instance, East and West Coast are major traffic zones that go through America. Extra pressure will come through illegals running up to Canada, forcing the government to deal with the problem. Essentially, deportation and clearing out the swamp while positioning the navy back in control of American ports destroys human trafficking. The Uniparty's major income is from Chinese investment, very high taxes and trafficking. The people are at their limit taxation wise, the Uniparty is nearly out of money and changes in Europe will shut down WEF influence, who will abandon Canada. Their original plan was to hopefully retrench in Canada failing everything else.
Add to that the brilliance of when our election happens. October 2025. Trump will have been in power for several months and we Canucks get to see the changes. And that will really piss us off. We're going to get, in the words of Ed Anger, pig biting mad. Add to that strong rumours that Trudeau is still a top suspect in the Barry and Honey Sherman murder and apparently is on the P. Diddy videos doing very very bad things. This will get interesting. Very.
It's going to get rough up here and already close to 80% of Canadians are deeply unhappy with the illegals. Cries of deport them all increase daily.
All in all, your predictions are pretty close to what will actually happen.
What shocks me is that so many Canadians want the immigrants gone… and yet they continue to support the CPC, which isn't going to do anything about immigration.
I notice you say ‘illegals’ a lot but this isn't really so relevant in Canada. Our problem is very much legal immigration.
Thought I’d add, yeah, CPC aint going to do diddly. I’m putting together a substack about just that because it all boils down to the nature of Canadian politics meaning that there are external controls primarily from Europe that prevent a lot of movement.
A tax revolt might mean NATO involvement. I really believe the bastards in Ottawa are basically Canadian mafia and hardcore enough to get really nasty.
Well it’s either illegals or as a friend once coined ‘ignagrants.’ I think they’re illegal. Too much was warped to make it happen. There are also various programs for citizenship that were hidden, such as a hidden Nigerian student visa program.
Anyways, what I see on various social media is the cry to send them all back, roughly anyone who got here under Trudeau’s reign.
This is why “illegals” doesn't work: they are perfectly legal. You might think the laws that allow them in are ridiculous, deceptive, and illegitimate, and you'd be right, but they are still laws.
Adopting the American political vocabulary doesn't work in this case. American conservatives love to focus on illegal migration (“we just want them to come here legally!”) as a means of heading off charges of racism. It never works, they still get called racist. But it gives them plausible internal deniability.
Canadian anti-immigration activists do not have this luxury. Illegal immigrants are a rounding error in the total migration numbers. Therefore it is precisely legal migration that must be opposed.
I think I understand. I”ll continue to use illegal of course, although Invader might be more appropriate and sidesteps legal issues. There are countless videos from Indians, Muslims and Jews where they straight up say that they intend to conquer and replace us. I could argue that the laws have been twisted to accommodate them and function not as laws anymore. I could easily argue that the majority of Canadians don’t give a particular about what they’re called, they want them all gone.
Here in my city, word on the street has always been don’t do business with Chinese or Indian, ever. And everyone has a story or three about all the illegal crap that has been going on. Ol’ whitey has been at it too, but not in numbers like them. Mostly what I hear is that anyone that came in under Trudeau should be deported. Redo strict regulations on incoming people, only pick the best and that after ten years of no immigration.
About 70% or more of Canadians in a poll recently, want exactly that. They’ve had enough.
“Illegals” doesn't work rhetorically because their presence in Canada is not technically illegal: they entered the country through regular ports of entry, and reside in Canada on perfectly legal visas. If Canadians run with “illegals”, liberals will simply be able to say “look at these stupid chuds, they think Canada has an illegal immigration problem, they don't know what they're talking about.” And they'll be technically correct. It also gives the Conservative party an out: they can focus on the “illegal immigration” problem, which barely exists, and pretend that this is doing something about the immigration problem.
Of course many of them break the law in many ways after they enter, but this is a different thing.
Again: “illegal immigrants” is bad rhetoric in Canada, because it is a dangerously inaccurate diagnosis of the problem.
Great discussion which is so rare - hope I’m not coming across as belligerent. You make great points. I’m considering using invaders much more than the other terms. I can see how that, if used en masse, would confuse the Liberals and sidestep any arguments they have as far as immigration whether legal -illegal.
Pretty brilliant if more Canadians used it. Takes an immigration issue and places it in more of an actual I don’t know, military position?
Fuck it. I’m in agreement. I’m going to use invaders from now on.
Indeed, and that’s exactly what they would do and why those terms were used, so that they would have an out, a way to pervert language and legal systems, which, in Canada, are labrynthine and perverse. However, I have seen the reactions of the majority of Canadians to accusations of racist or as you point out, discussions of a legal nature and the response is always the same - “don’t care, I’m a racist then, they’re illegal, all of them must go.”
There is one possibility though. Trudeau who is responsible for this mess, who caused it, is considered a top suspect in the murder of Barry and Honey Sherman, I believe very very rich people, billionaires, as well as rumoured to have appeared at the infamous Piggy Palace parties - if you don’t know, Robert Pickton had a Port Coquitlam Property where murder parties were held, where police were rumoured to show up and where Justin Trudeau lived a half mile down the road, as he skied at Whistler. And there are rumours he is on the P. Diddy tapes. Add to that the death jab, which he was involved in and you have crimes against humanity as well as serial murders. Some fraud with the SNC Lavalin case as well.
All of this together if true, plus participation with the Liberals would invalidate any bills laws or actions taken by him and his government. This is why I call them illegals. As well, they are not here to assimilate. They are here to take over. There are videos where they describe this and that is evidence that they are, in fact, foreign invaders and thus, illegal.
Any rhetoric the Liberals use, or the Conservatives, is just that and would not stand in a court of law without that court also being corrupt. And one more thing: America has the right to come up here and arrest and extradite, so if Trudeau is on the P. Diddy tapes, then that is just extra.
Your depiction of how the Liberals would react, how they would talk, is spot on, that’s exactly the failed strategy they would use. So would the Conservatives if they were in the hot seat.
Missed you John. Great read brother. I was just commenting the other day I think Europe is ready for the collaboration. We stand on the verge of a breakthrough. A renaissance if you will.
Of all the pitfalls you mentioned none are more troubling than this game of nuclear chicken. This time Putin is just a proxy. The real brinksmanship is between Trump and the demons that walk among us. He may have to capitulate to a degree. It might explain the Gaetz/Bondi situation. It’s hard to say really.
Its frightening what I see behavior-wise. I don’t believe Putin has anymore lessons in him to teach. If we continue to escalate after this point (lob some ATACMS at a NPP for example) I’m afraid it’s going to get very ugly.
It’s not that I think Putin would fall for it. I’m sure he knows just about better than anyone what the vile creatures are up to. My concern is they may paint him into a corner where a heavy response is the only choice. Best example is them using ATACMS to blow apart a Nuclear Power Plant. That’s unforgivable and even if Russia successfully shoots them down it’s still quite a conundrum to be in.
On the other hand it’s really hard for me to believe they all want to die. And there’s a good chance that’s the next step. I was never in the military or police but I did participate in a quite a bit of violence in bar fights and street brawls. It’s always the same. Once you know it’s going to erupt you skip all the dialogue and intermediate escalations and get right down to biz. Incapacitate the enemy before he does you.
However, There’s a lot of policy shapers in the West who don’t seem to have the first clue what violence even really means. These young ladies in high level think tanks come to mind. It’s extremely dangerous IMHO.
Involvement in geopolitics should require having been punched in the face as a child as a basic prerequisite. And having punched someone else in the face. If you don't have that experience you lack the basic emotional circuitry to properly process conflict, which leads to miscalculation.
Zero tolerance policies for violence have ruined our foreign policy establishment.
It doesn’t have to be Russian missile as a response. A sunken carrier in the Dead Sea can be more effective because unexpected while rockets over Europe is expected. We’re on the global board now and this is how the Enemy see it.
It's not that "they" want to die that's the problem; it's that "they" don't want to die and don't accept death coming for them as it does for all.
What worth their money, power and elite-status and self-image, before the gentle caress of Elle*, and before you find yourself either treading Bifrost or the Helway?
That realisation is part of why they act so rash one second, so mule-headed the other, and so seemingly irrational - they cannot escape death, yet they try frantically to do so any way they can. Doing anything just might work, is the feeling driving them.
And yes, that behaviour very much come from them never ever having been in at the sharp end.Witness the ridiculous "self-defence"-laws of most western nations for proof.
What are you like 5 years old? Lol you have me laughing now.
Listen Eugine, rather it be directly or indirectly you are marching us to the grave. The people playing the fife you dance have no business with you. You will never be one of them. They are elites who’s system is collapsing right before their eyes. They were so close to ensnaring humanity into it forever. This has driven them mad. Most don’t even know what they are doing (the ones I call little girls). Some, no doubt do. They would rather die and take the world with them as opposed to losing the concentration of their power.
Control of the money supply is the root of their power. It’s enforced by our military. It’s why we have hundreds of bases around the world.
Ok am done with you Eugine. Now fly away, fly fly fly
I am not so certain you can say such a thing with absolute confidence. Unfortunately the subject is not rather or not he will finally withhold shipments of Russian vodka. If things break the wrong way we are all doomed. It’s the sort of thinking you describe that has gotten us here.
Remember there are no do overs once this starts. Now I must ask you if you read what me and John were discussing? Have you ever been in any violent confrontations Eugine? Have you ever had your skull bashed in? Bleed out from shrapnel wounds lately lol?
Anyone encouraging that this war continue should experience some of that joy.
Go volunteer to fight it. Wtf would you say if Russia or China put missiles aimed at us on their military bases in Mexico. As of today neither nation has any bases so this is all hypothetical. If you can’t see the hypocrisy in that it’s because your paid filthy lying NAFO troll.
Your type drives me to a whole other level. If only there way to spot you. I shall make it my mission to do just that after the nukes bring down the grid. That’s where this is going because little girls like you think it’s fun to play with matches.
I sure hope so. Welcome to the pretext of Armageddon Eugine. I hereby sentence you to watch Eugine. When some country also run by little girls like France gets vaporized I hope you are not there or anywhere close to ground zero.
We will revisit this if that should occur IF we even have comms. I seriously doubt we will. But don’t worry Eugine, I will be thinking of you. 🙂
I worry most for the UK's future, especially with prick-in-chief Starmer captaining the ship. He's such a smarmy tosser. Still, there may yet be hope: perhaps if other European populist forces can do their part in putting Starmer in place - and the boomers can let go of their nonsense - Great Britain may well be saved. Or, at least, kept from ruin until a real leader can take over again.
Farage or some other Reform candidate could do it in five years, but it remains to be seen whether any of them really have the stones.
They got theirs, eh? They’re so insufferable about it, though. I never had the disdain for boomers that others so evidently have until I asked them about the future and they had little more to say than “bootstraps” in the face of a vastly disparate, challenging, and—at times—unworkable world driven by a relentless distraction economy.
Oh well, I suppose. I agree with you about young women: it’s only a matter of time until they change their tune, I think; the future is not about girl bosses or woke nonsense. It’s about a return to truly transcendent masculine and feminine virtues in the greatest sense.
Every single time I've talked about the professional difficulties caused by DEI policies with boomers, they almost invariably say something like, “Well, but surely you can understand, it's necessary to correct historical injustices.”
To which I tell them, “You've got yours so fuck me, right? Hey you're a really good person though, correcting historical injustices to no cost to yourself.”
Every time immigration comes up, they say, “Well someone needs to pay for the pensions!”
To which I tell them, “You were too busy having fun to have kids, so now we don't get to have a civilization?”
The boomers aged out of child bearing decades ago so that problem is to be found elsewhere. Seems to be Gen X as there's been a blip up among Millennials. Still less than replacement. When we were in the fertile years, we reproduced at approximately replacement levels. Every generation since 1800 has had a lower fertility rate than the preceding one except the Greatest Generation that produced the Boomers.
This is US data. I would guess for Canada, the point of inflection is when the Frogs got the pill.
Forget Farage. He has been cornered at several talks and has very clearly distanced himself from anything you are imagining. While patriotic, he has made his peace with multicultural Britain. Many have, although they are a minority.
The elite didn't want Brexit. The vote was a considerable inconvenience for them. Naturally however, they adapted, and screwed it up.
This illustrates the greatest weakness of populism, which is that the people have a tendency to think that a victory at the polls is decisive, and then to go back to their lives, whereas the elites understand that politics never ends.
Trump's campaign was also given a substantial boost by several thuggish acts by the Regime during the election...including the intentional denial of hurricane relief, which lost North Carolina, the harassment of Amish milk producers selling raw milk (which is more nutritious) causing 150,000 new Amish voters to register for the 1st time, and the armed raid on an animal resuer, with the purpose of murdering Peanut the squirrel, who was popular on TikTok...Squirrel memes were everywhere...
It was also helped by the verbal abilities of Vance, Musk and Vivek, who repeatedly made mincemeat of hostile interviewers.....
Absolutely. All unforced errors.
The NC thing was especially crazy. Can't believe they actually had orders to skip houses with Trump signs.
These people need to go to jail.
That's for certain, and that's why the RINOs an Democrats had to block the Gaetz nomination...
They need to. But they won't. They rarely do. The left is much more diligent about chasing down and exterminating opposition than the right/center ever has been or ever will be.
As a chemist I look at things from a thermodynamic vantage.
Your mention of the Nordstream "sabotage" is relevant. I enjoyed Seymour Hersh's appreciation of the event.
In tonight's reading I note that the Norwegians are annoyed at the cost of wind power from Denmark and Germany and may "cut the cord."
Your sense that Germany in particular has been deindustrialised by the Green energy stupidity is apropos.
Energy equals wealth (and power) and France has maintained control of energy production.
We await the American outcome of the third? coming of "Drill, baby, drill!" It won't be as productive as the previous results for geophysical reasons but may support the recovery of a certain ability to exert power.
Finally, why would you doubt the exercise of bureaucratic stupidity?
All the Regimes across the West are desperate. They know that if they lose political influence it won't just be that they're not getting reelected any time soon, it'll be that they're not getting jobs anywhere. I don't want my hamburger served to me by some employee with blue hair who used to work for the State Health Board.
I sure hope you don’t want coffee…
It was impossible to elect the Democrats. The silence the day after the election and the bow out by Harris (the only classy moment I can remember from her) makes me think the cabal got their man in. I just can't stop thinking about the assassination attempt on Trump. How all of them are members of the actor's guild. All of them. Thomas Crooks, Ashley Babbitt, Donald Trump, every face they let us see is under contract. Trumps bodyguards were actors. They didn't care how fake it seemed live, they just wanted that money shot for the campaign. Why does Donald Trump look younger than he did eight years ago? It's theater. Remember when Trump read the snake story? "You knew I was a snake when you let me in?" WTF?
I love this, yes. We're on a countdown, the signs of it are everywhere if one knows what to look for - in to and beyond the carefully curated theatre.
"The elite will not address these problems because it is the elite causing these problems, which the elite is doing because it is profiting from them."
Deep-define the el-lite: all you will get is Time, Saturn, El.
One can stare goggle-eyed at what is happening outside in the global theatre, or get the soul in order. It might sound "religious", but it's not - it's metaphysic reality.
You're ignoring all his actions when he was President. Such as the EOS. His actions against the Zionists in Israel. It's difficult. We've been in prison a long time and sometimes it's hard to see that freedom might be near.
Well, he had to appear to be loyalist. His actions will prove his loyalty. Remember Operation Warp Speed? He's pro-vax despite all the death and sickness caused by the military countermeasures from the DOD? He is going to move us to a gold backed CDBC, and save the financial world. For a time, you'll be able to trade your bankster-hundos for this new electronic currency. Everyone is going to say that he's a hero. The only catch will be that you've got to be vaxxed and tracked to participate in the new economy. The entire globalist agenda will continue to roll out. All the federal land grabs (agenda 21) will continue. The biosecurity state (agenda 30) will continue its progress. Look, it's that or Kamala Harris and the tranny blue-hairs (unelectable). Do you see that it's a false choice? Everyone got funneled into supporting Trump, who did Operation Warp Speed, who has prayed at the Eastern Wall with his Kippah on, and who is to Jared Kushner as Hillary Clinton was to Huma Abadin.
Operation Warp Speed was uncovered by intensive anon research where it was discovered that the cabal had been planning something far nastier than what occurred - millions dead by the jab. Trump actually forced them to move faster than what they had originally planned. A lot of the jabs were placebos. However, while they didn’t have enough of the death jabs, they did have enough to target red states where one can look up number of deaths.
Everything that they had planned was upset by Hillary not getting elected and Trump moving their depopulation faster than they wanted. However, none of this will convince you, obviously. But, if you were paying attention, you may have noticed that certain things happened immediately upon his election. The migrant caravan at the US border dissolved, China wants to work peacefully with the US, the EU will switch from buying oil from Russia to buying oil from the US and there’s a lot more. Essentially, various countries and continents signalled that they prefer Trump and started to work on their problems, which was predicted by the anons. Cascade effect.
Not going to argue this anymore. Just continue to watch and observe.
If you don't argue, you lose. You left the field of battle, which according to the rules of conduct of warfare, means you lose. I'm just kidding. I think you're influenced too much by Mossad propaganda. I wish you were right, and if it turns out that Trump is the incarnation of Saint Jermaine, is the rightful King of England, is a time traveler who owns all the inventions of Nicola Tesla, and is the legitimate hero humanity deserves, I will happily join team Trump. Trump literally works for the corporate entity that runs the USA on a for-profit basis. He's 100% a theater actor.
Dang, it’s odd getting a measured intelligent response. It really is. Believe me, I have my doubts as well. For me, something I have said before bears repeating: A lot of what I’ve figured out doesn’t come from Trump, but the anons who started eight years ago. For me personally, it started after 9-11. Been in it a bit long. It was always the anons. Trump? Definitely a central character. But it’s the people.
Always.
I noticed in all this research I was doing that things were happening that I had never seen before. CEO’s in droves stepping down. 900,000 sealed indictments. Most of the mid-east switchng from US fiat currency to their own system, and one not controlled by the central banks. Entire global banks simply dissolving. It sure looks like the old power structure is going down. Odd little things like the once mighty ADL no longer as powerful. They had successfully sued Elon for a few billion, and managed to get some agents placed in X, and so far, their reach is limited. It’s not total free speech there, but it sure is a lot more free speech. Or in the news - haven’t heard Bilderger meeting anything, where talk of black budgets was yearly and discussed at length, now non-existent. And so much more.
While I hope whatever new is coming in isn’t straight up evil and so I write optimistically about that, I don’t know until it happens and goes one way or the other but I do see that the old power structure is crumbling.
Interesting theory, let's see how it plays out...More likely IMO is that a lot of the big money awakened to the threat that a Kamala presidency would lead to total disaster..
"The British people themselves will hardly be oblivious to events beyond their borders, and when other people are getting nice things – for instance, governments that actually represent their interests – there’s a strong tendency to want those things for yourself"
Who would have guessed that law and order and national sovereignty will be for the British in 2026 what Levi's jeans and Marlboros were to Eastern Bloc denizens in 1986. Similar dynamics, hopefully similar outcomes. I've said elsewhere that there's a late-Soviet, Eric Honecker-on-the-balcony vibe going on. And like that period, one by one, they all fell, as they must here.
And in terms of Kompromat, every time I see Ursula Van der Leyen I'm convinced that off-hours she's the dominatrix at de Sade-level orgies amongst the degenerate Eurotrash "elite" that will make Diddy's Freak Offs look like a Rotary Club barbeque.
I truly hope Trump and/or Vance are transformational figures, otherwise Putin might as well let 'er rip because otherwise I can't see any other form of purge-renewal taking place.
That would not surprise me in the slightest about von der Leyen.
The late Soviet vibes are intense.
She recently helped a fellow passenger on a plane she was travelling on, on the way back from Rio and the G20 summit, since she is - believe it or not - an accredited MD.
I loathe her as a politician and see her as an enemy of the people, but this was surprising human act of her.
I suppose when it's a real human in need in front of her, and not just statistics on a graph-paper, she actually has some empathy?
The sad thing is that she is probably thoroughly convinced that she is a very good person, fighting the good fight, caring for the people.
Maybe, or perhaps it was more performative and strategic, as in she saw a possible headline: Passenger falls ill on same flight as accredited MD Van Der Leyen; Criticised for her inaction.
Could be. Could be both too I suppose.
Still, a good deed is good deed, and I'm hoping this indicates a sea-change in her conscience.
Hope is, after all, free.
OTOH, as a licenced MD, if she didn't help she'd be in a WORLD of pain and trouble.
There are three theories as to why the cheat was ineffective. 1. too big to rig. 2. Republican countermeasures worked. 3. they didn't dial it up to 11 this time. Not because they were reconciled to Trump but because they wanted to get rid of Harris. Governors of both MI and PA have Presidential ambitions and Harris was in the way. Probably a combination of all three.
Good point regarding 3.
Or the minorities were too turned off by the Democrats that they stayed home, with the exception of blacks, single women, and the Fruit Juices.
There's a theory the USA is going to blow in the next 4 years. I've been tracking the unbacked money-printing by the FED, and it keeps on going. I don't exactly know if they're trapped or not, if the disorder is irreversible or not, but if this continues, the hyperinflation of the US dollar is inevitable... and why would Democrats want to be on the helm when that happens? Instead, they blame Trump/Republicans and start a violent uprising.
1. Not too big to rig. Trump had fewer votes in 2024 than 2020.
2. Doubtful. 15 million abnormal votes are hard to disappear.
3. Also doubtful, given the massive financial, media and celebrity support for the 'Toe.
More likely, someone made a deal to turn off the machine, this time. Notice anything about the geopolitical leanings of Trumps cabinet picks?
Conservative, obviously. I see a lot of FL, TX and NY. Or do you mean international geopolitics.
The elites aren’t a monolith. Elon and Rogan siding with Trump was the official signal that the shitlib elites were declaring war on the progressive elites. The results don’t conflict with elite theory at all unless one incorrectly assumes that elites don’t experience intra-group competition.
Intraelite competition is certainly a factor, and much more of one now than it was in 2016.
You touched on it, but perhaps underplayed the importance of the Zionist sect of the elites. They are the dominant donor class of the militant American left and without their dollars, there were no bricks to throw or busses full of activists to show up and riot.
did you misspell Israelite? heh
Intra-group competition is feature of elitism, not an aberration.
Peter Turchin stressed that elite overproduction was one MAJOR factor in the age of discord. When there are more players than musical chair, they’ll gore each other’s eyes out, as seen in the Roman civil wars, Japanese wars for shogunate, War of Roses, etc. No group, elite or pleb, are ever monolithic. Not even the Communists or China or Israel.
This is why it’s a mistake to be a doomer, the cracks are always there. Just have to dig in and listen and then try to break the enemy unity by stressing their differences. America’s Indian wars was successful because we were able to play the Creeks off against Sioux and so forth. We wanted to do likewise with the Arabs, Hispanics, and others to create space for ourselves. But it take a ruthless will to do so. Don’t obsess over the numbers. Pick a battle that play to your strengths.
I'm still leaning towards the "Trump is going to piss away every opportunity just like last time" camp, but optimistic outlooks like yours and Jeff Childers's are giving me hope. Thank you. Maybe the assassination attempts were a "come to Jesus" moment for him, as some have suggested.
We'll see what happens. The team surrounding him is much better than it was before, which is the main cause for optimism imo. However, many need to be confirmed by the Senate. That may and probably will lead to some unwelcome changes.
"The balance of evidence doesn’t really suggest that Trump was chosen by the elite, so much as that the elite reluctantly came to terms with the fact that, after they’d thrown everything they had at him – relentless defamation, lawfare, assassination attempts – they’d gotten outplayed, were going to lose"
Are unaware that Trump had the support of right wing zionist since 2016? He even had more support since 10/7. Or do you not consider Zionists part of the elite?
There was nothing reluctant about Miriam Adelsons 100 million...but she's a white hat. 🙄 Right?
Trust The plan.
I specifically mentioned Zionist support as a factor.
My understanding is that the Adelson woman doesn't actually cough up the full amount she promised.
But Trump was clearly chosen by most of the elites, or the elite faction with the most power, that's why there is no real resistance; no real protest, no accusations of Russian interference, positive coverage on corporate media and right wing zionist are creaming their pants.
So many people on the DR are framing Trumps win as some kind of loss to the power structure. I see no "oh well, we wanted Harris, but we are stuck we Trump".
He very clearly wasn't chosen by most of the elites, or their media would have fallen in behind them (they didn't), and he would have raised more money than Kamala (he didn't).
Trump might be onboard with the idea of a stronger Europe, but the American oligarchs on either side of the Uniparty Corporation most certainly wants all of Europe to be kept down, for the simple reason that we (could and would) offer real competition, and as one of Saints of Capitalism said: "Competition is a Sin".
Further, a resurgence or even a second Renaissance would mean a complete scorched earth-capmpaign against US entertaintment media: Hollywood was after all founded by whom as what, you know, and for a an explicit purpose.
Personally, I think it is high time for a divorce. America is its own nation, and will barring actions which are un-American and politically impossible become a huge Zimbabwe-Venezuela: the odds of that are actually greater than EUrope going that route, for two reasons:
Demographic shift via migration and birth-rates, that same old tune, and:
Just as individuals do, cultures too revert to type. How will USA look when WASPs and other "whites" are 1/3 of the population?
And one other thing, not noticeable from the outside:
The very boring - and to many Americans and English-in-exile colonials scary - trait that makes us (Teutons, Angles, Saxons, et cetera) seem to always have the same opinion as were we a collective being?
If and when it turns, we /all/ turn all at once.
I've been saying this for years. Scandinavians in particular are a consensus society. When the consensus shifts it is abrupt and total. The next consensus will be “get them all out, now, we don't care how.”
Regarding US and Europe, a relationship as competitive frenemies is preferable to the existing state. Iron sharpens iron. Monopolists might not want competition, but these are the conditions that move civilization forward.
If you look at all of Europe's most culturally fruitful eras (and we can neglect the rest of the world because, well, it just isn't important), it was always during periods of disunity and intensive competition.
"Dare to be brave" is a slogan that would play better here than 'MEGA' since MAGA ranks just below "Hello Victory" (in German) in the EU.
It is vague enough, yet clear enough, and it allows precisely the space to pivot that must be allowed our entrenched elites - pikes in pond-mentality and all - to turn and play at being leader.
Here's something interesting: spoke to a busdriver today, he asked tentatively what my take on the proposed re-establishment of prison ships in Sweden.
"Shoot them if they have done rape, arson, murder or repeated violent offences" said I, continuing "and if they are migrants, erect gallows at every border crossing and hang the bodies up for the crows."
Instead of looking at me as an escaped loon, he actually thought it over and we had a half-hour long conversation on the wider topic of crime, migrations and how to handle convicted felons.
Ten years ago, such a forthright conversation would not have happened. Maybe, just maybe, that's an Omen that the Spinner's threads are about to form a new pattern.
“You know,” thought the bus driver, as he thought about the grenade attacks, the rapes, the constant vandalism, the brown-skinned youth gangs lurking about the streets selling drugs, harassing women, and menacing law-abiding citizens, “This right wing maniac has a good point.”
Pattern recognition has served the species well for millennia.
“Instead of a wall on the border, we will plant a vast forest so that the crows may feast in shade.” I forget who said that.
The Greeks beat Persia because they were fighting each other for so long that even Athens could kick their asses despite not being as big. It’s one thing to have the numbers. It’s another thing to have an army that is very spirited, experienced, and can invent on the fly. It’s not a guarantee, but it’s an important factor.
Even Afghans beat War Street Empire after 20 years! They were just as competitive as the Greeks 2,000 years ago.
China tends to be the most creative when divided into the Warring States. They can innovate but only when there are a lot of warlords to give them the permission.
“… periods of disunity and intensive competition.”
Here’s the book:
Interesting (annoyingly this shows up on Notes but not in the comments).
Substack is wonky
Seriously.
English school children will be a minority in the classroom by 2031. Each year the replacement is accelerating. That is the blackest of black pills. What will be left of the West then?
This is why merely stopping immigration is insufficient. Remigration is necessary.
And in the UK as in Western Europe, I doubt that will happen peacefully.
And as you alluded to, albeit obliquely, we are still British, and still a warlike people under it all. Many still imagine they can vote their way out. Once it sinks in we may see a different vibe.
Bingo.
As for "warlike people", I'd like to remind you that British didn't rebel in 3 centuries. And even before that they scarcely had rebellions. Doesn't sound "warlike" to me. Yes, they were very renown pirates and plunderers, but that's all warfare that happens in somebody else's land, far away from home. War is completely a different affair if you don't know if your wife and children have been raped, killed, or your house burned down.
Yes, the British tradition is to make war on others, not themselves.
The problem being the war for MEGA will be a war on oneself.
No it won't. It will initially be against the imports, who are not ourselves despite the very best attempts of the media to rebrand people as New Canadians, New Germans etc.
The tension is normal because different peoples occupying the same territory causes conflict. So what happens when one group understand the territory as their homeland, the only homeland they possess?
I am not an advocate for war or violence, but given how unpopular mass immigration is politics is failing and more are noticing. Look at the Irish.
Not much. As Mark Steyn says, the future belongs to those who show up. In Canada, we can see that happening in Toronto suburbs, where formerly white towns and cities are now almost completely transformed into Arab and South Asian enclaves, with all the diverse fun that brings: imported ethnic conflicts, sword fights in mall parking lots, massive increases in car and home robberies, fraud, slum-like housing, sprawl, horrific traffic, and the infiltration and infestation of every political, cultural and educational institution. The remaining whites are now literally ex-pats in their own countries whose concerns aren't listened to, at all, by their new Sikh and Muslim overlords.
Utterly horrifying! Canada and England will need multiple Oranias.
No, we need more Jamestowns and Plymouths as the seed-cities.
“Make Europe Great Again” -- which is to say, “Make Europe *Europe* Again!”
MEEA!
Sounds like a battle cry lol
Good tour of the horizon. As you note and Zhou Enlai famously said "It's too soon to tell". I would favor a policy of benign neglect toward Europe unless the regimes there threaten our interests like trying to shut down Musk, then whack them in some appropriate way. Wait to see if the populist revolutionaries succeed and then do bilateral deals. If enough of them succeed, then see if they want to band together. With the US out, they will really have the choice between Russia and Islam. If they want the US back, they have to change.
The UK is a special problem because of the long lease on life of the crazies. We should terminate Five Eyes and make it clear that the Special Relationship is over. Beyond that, watch them collapse and consider running guns by private parties as once happened with Ireland (which is currently crazier than the UK). Keep the regime locked up in London and other big cities.
Loved the Canada meme.
I support all of these measures.
Very likely all Trump has to do to destabilize European governments is “nothing at all”, but more aggressive measures would certainly hasten the process.
If the US was to act against the EU when Trump is in office, all it would do is galvanise people to fall in line with their respective national regimes.
The reason for this is as stupid as it is simple:
The US is perceived as a "white" nation, and is therefore "legal" to show public dislike for.
Best thing would be if Trump indeed did nothing when it comes to USA-EU relations, and focused on getting the USA back on the right track. Succeeding in deporting criminals, righting the economy, and cleaning out mandated racism, sexism and such (DEI) plus cleaning house with the acronym-agencies would cause our leaders to start emulating his actions.
After some careful rebranding of course.
This is why the specific actions I suggest are essentially a) do nothing, just withdraw support, b) weaponize social media, which largely amounts to ensuring Europeans have a platform for open discourse, and maybe c) occasional carefully timed releases, via deniable leaks, of damaging information.
Trump openly endorsing parties or leaders would probably be politically toxic.
I would borrow a page from the Communist International and do quiet support through private parties with capital, logistics, training. Like it or not, they were excellent teachers to learn from in many things. Disdaining to learn from them is as stupid as keep playing the Globalists’ “rasssssist” games.
Not endorsing but doing bilateral deals would be OK
Funny thing is that increasing number of Indians and Africans whose visas have expired, and who *should* be deported, have all of a sudden discovered they're gay and bisexual and are applying for - and will most likely receive - asylum on that basis.
Canada is now officially the immigration equivalent of a construction site port-a-potty, and unlike the US, there is no mainstream politician advocating for mass deportations. The cheap labour and fake GDP growth is just too enticing to our oligopolistic elites.
The Anals are a problem. We need a heat sink to drain them out, and the best solution is some kind of Robert Heinlein’s Coventry. It’s an island cut off from the world where all the neverdowells go to do as they will. Make it a reservation for the Anals and they’ll go there expecting fun and freedom but finding hell that they can’t escape from. And they’ll only have themselves to blame.
We are going to need a Wall on that border too.
I honesty hope Trump rains holy hell down on us, we deserve it. Hopefully that will convince Trudeau to retire and disappear, and his whole fetid government with him.
Ah, you are Canadian. All Trump would have to do is prohibit health tourism by Canadians. That would collapse your national health service by tieing down the pressure valve.
He doesn't have to do a thing, it's collapsing under the sheer weight of an additional 7-8 million people arriving in Canada since 2020. I've seen some estimates that Canada might have up to 55 million people currently living here even though the official estimate is around 43 million. Were Trump to do that, Canadian healthcare would probably degrade to a level of a developing country, *very* quickly. If you walk into an ER in Brampton, Ontario, or Surrey, BC, it's already there.
Why wouldn't a European national government be allowed to "threaten our interests"?
Corollary: what would a European nation be justified in doing should the USA threaten its interests?
Nobody should be allowed to threaten our legitimate interests. Legitimate interests do not include telling other countries how to live or being Globocop.
The term "legitimate interests" raises hackles on any non-American due to the USA's well-known history of interpreting that phrase as it having ownership and control over the natural resources of other nations, and a right to restrict trade to and from any nation it so chooses, even if it is trade between third parties not involving the USA in any way.
A step back from that would be most welcome, and something which would endear Trump to many leaders around the world.
That is why I did the exclusions. I would consider your comment as a friendly amendment.
That was the intent, yes.
I think it is safe to assume that the peoples of the USA and Europe both are in agreement on this, and that the various firebrands chucked about from our leadership-castes ("Warmongering Ameritards" vs "Freeloading Eurotrash" and other such nonsense) are intended to prevent a popular surge for peace and free trade and free competition as well as spontaneous co-peration on common issues.
Divide et impera, playing to the absolute lowest common denominator of dumb national pride.
"propagoblins"! Great word.
I feel like an article is incomplete unless there's at least one neologistic portmanteau.
Let the thousand new dictionaries bloom out of the hemp patch!
Why must we assume that the current elites are the actual elites? The new media (counter culture) celebs/elites did more to help Trump than we give them credit for. In this attention society, guys like Rogan, Theo Von, the Nelk Boys, Tim Dillon, Brett Weinstein, Tony Hinchcliffe, Dana White, Jordan Peterson, etc. all platformed (in some way) Trump and/or his team to their massive audiences who trust their creators. These elites in some way have fully subverted not only traditional media but have attained the public trust due to honesty.
If you can in some ways successfully influence the public in a democracy, are you not the true elite?
An excellent point. However, the old elite still control the institutions and the finances; they're not done yet by any means.
Righto there too. Slow power is still power. Not as fast and virus-like as memes and media but still prominent.
Not to defend Macron, but Marine is not a populist leader but more a McCain, Obama or Poilievre. The actual populist options are Aselineau, Bardella and Marion (Marine’s niece).
And yet, Marine is the one they're trying to jail…
True, though Aselineau has faced ‘hate-crime charges’ or whatever and is banned I believe from politics, Bardella was the populist choice for Prime Minister but was blocked and is having to appeal to the EU and Orban for assistance last I checked. And as to Marion as she enjoys enormous support from all ‘right wing factions’ as heiress of the Le Pen family, if her aunt falls likely they’ll come after her next.
And one of the biggest populist figure in some circles Jean Capet who had begun to with the farmers’ protests become a viable alternative has been imprisoned in his home, stripped of his properties and is facing lawfare. Not trying to be too disagreeable John, I just didn't used to trust Marine, though that said I don't think she should have lawfare done against her. This is as you noted clearly another attack against a populist French figure following after Bock-Cote, Aselineau, & Son Majesté Jean IV and now Marine.
I wonder what it is about these potential successors of DeGaulle that frightens the Regime so much? Surely, with France surrounded they should feel at ease. I mean they control her nuclear-submarines, her warships and have NATO bases, and yet they keep attacking her potential leaders more it seems than English, German, Italian or Spanish ones. It really boggles my mind.
According to various Catholic Saints and their prophecies, the revolution that will free us of the Satanists begins in France.
Can you name one?
There are many in this book, which is hard to find now, but maybe you can find a pdf or an archive copy of it.
https://amzn.to/4hWNAFg
Hope so, I’m French-Canadian and though biased towards France, Germany and Japan are bigger economies, Spain and Italy are more hot-tempered ordinarily and Britain was a former Empire.
So I always figured going after them makes more sense, but the prophecy angle might explain it. These Democrats likely believe it and don’t want to take the risk of France slipping out from their fingertips. And give Quebec, French-Africa, Vietnam all want to go back to being colonies and Japan has a huge French diaspora and is one of the capitals of the Francophone Association of Asia I believe they’re tied into French interests (looked it up after the post).
That is a lot of optimism about Trump's second term!
I voted for Trump, and I'm happy he won, but I would be pleasantly surprised if even a tenth of it happens. Well, except for the part about Europe stepping up its military spending - the need for that is so obvious at this point that it may well have happened under a Harris presidency.
I've written some of my own thoughts about what Trump is likely to achieve (and what problems are beyond his ken) at my own Substack: https://twilightpatriot.substack.com/p/move-over-grover-cleveland
John Carter's basic description of the problem is sound... Europe really has been weakened even more than the "imperial core"... I am just doubtful that Europe's right will find more effective leaders than Marine Le Pen and Eric Zemmour and Rishi Sunak and (facepalms) Liz Truss to advance their cause. Those people weren't able to handle the problem - so who is waiting in the wings?
Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss are not, and never were, leaders of the “right”. Conservative parties are not right wing in the slightest.
in europe there is not a single "right" leader. Fake ones are a dozen...
Should Trump succeed in ending the Ukraine war, any momentum to increased military spending will evaporate like puddles after a desert storm.
I so very, very much hope you are correct; however, I remain skeptical
He could end it quickly by pulling the plug on Ukraine. No real leverage on Russia There would be a domestic price but does he care. Best solution is ceasefire in place with new borders there. Perhaps a trade of Ukranian help territory around Kursk. Partially lifting sanctions. No NATO. Rebuilding aid
Make EU pay. Russia pays for Donbas. Some sort of security guarantee for Ukraine. EU?Peacekeeper s along borders. India? Get rid of indictments for Russians and Israelis. Clip wings of ICC.
Nobody is waiting in the wings. https://gaiusbaltar.substack.com/p/what-is-wrong-with-the-western-political To approach the fore, in Europe, you need to go through a political party. Any party. And there they select the people who will be put to the fore. And they select them good.
You're pretty close actually. I've predicted in my own substack how Trump needs to deal with China and Canada. Tariffs will be applied to Canada. He'll go tough on Canada's den of vipers, the Grits and Tories (NDP will just flail and die). As for deportation, he has to talk to China. China moves fent and people through SA and Canada. For instance, East and West Coast are major traffic zones that go through America. Extra pressure will come through illegals running up to Canada, forcing the government to deal with the problem. Essentially, deportation and clearing out the swamp while positioning the navy back in control of American ports destroys human trafficking. The Uniparty's major income is from Chinese investment, very high taxes and trafficking. The people are at their limit taxation wise, the Uniparty is nearly out of money and changes in Europe will shut down WEF influence, who will abandon Canada. Their original plan was to hopefully retrench in Canada failing everything else.
Add to that the brilliance of when our election happens. October 2025. Trump will have been in power for several months and we Canucks get to see the changes. And that will really piss us off. We're going to get, in the words of Ed Anger, pig biting mad. Add to that strong rumours that Trudeau is still a top suspect in the Barry and Honey Sherman murder and apparently is on the P. Diddy videos doing very very bad things. This will get interesting. Very.
It's going to get rough up here and already close to 80% of Canadians are deeply unhappy with the illegals. Cries of deport them all increase daily.
All in all, your predictions are pretty close to what will actually happen.
What shocks me is that so many Canadians want the immigrants gone… and yet they continue to support the CPC, which isn't going to do anything about immigration.
I notice you say ‘illegals’ a lot but this isn't really so relevant in Canada. Our problem is very much legal immigration.
Same in America. There are many new news sources now, but most still watch Fox despite rooting for Biden in ‘20
Thought I’d add, yeah, CPC aint going to do diddly. I’m putting together a substack about just that because it all boils down to the nature of Canadian politics meaning that there are external controls primarily from Europe that prevent a lot of movement.
A tax revolt might mean NATO involvement. I really believe the bastards in Ottawa are basically Canadian mafia and hardcore enough to get really nasty.
Well it’s either illegals or as a friend once coined ‘ignagrants.’ I think they’re illegal. Too much was warped to make it happen. There are also various programs for citizenship that were hidden, such as a hidden Nigerian student visa program.
Anyways, what I see on various social media is the cry to send them all back, roughly anyone who got here under Trudeau’s reign.
This is why “illegals” doesn't work: they are perfectly legal. You might think the laws that allow them in are ridiculous, deceptive, and illegitimate, and you'd be right, but they are still laws.
Adopting the American political vocabulary doesn't work in this case. American conservatives love to focus on illegal migration (“we just want them to come here legally!”) as a means of heading off charges of racism. It never works, they still get called racist. But it gives them plausible internal deniability.
Canadian anti-immigration activists do not have this luxury. Illegal immigrants are a rounding error in the total migration numbers. Therefore it is precisely legal migration that must be opposed.
I think I understand. I”ll continue to use illegal of course, although Invader might be more appropriate and sidesteps legal issues. There are countless videos from Indians, Muslims and Jews where they straight up say that they intend to conquer and replace us. I could argue that the laws have been twisted to accommodate them and function not as laws anymore. I could easily argue that the majority of Canadians don’t give a particular about what they’re called, they want them all gone.
Here in my city, word on the street has always been don’t do business with Chinese or Indian, ever. And everyone has a story or three about all the illegal crap that has been going on. Ol’ whitey has been at it too, but not in numbers like them. Mostly what I hear is that anyone that came in under Trudeau should be deported. Redo strict regulations on incoming people, only pick the best and that after ten years of no immigration.
About 70% or more of Canadians in a poll recently, want exactly that. They’ve had enough.
Invaders is good.
“Illegals” doesn't work rhetorically because their presence in Canada is not technically illegal: they entered the country through regular ports of entry, and reside in Canada on perfectly legal visas. If Canadians run with “illegals”, liberals will simply be able to say “look at these stupid chuds, they think Canada has an illegal immigration problem, they don't know what they're talking about.” And they'll be technically correct. It also gives the Conservative party an out: they can focus on the “illegal immigration” problem, which barely exists, and pretend that this is doing something about the immigration problem.
Of course many of them break the law in many ways after they enter, but this is a different thing.
Again: “illegal immigrants” is bad rhetoric in Canada, because it is a dangerously inaccurate diagnosis of the problem.
Great discussion which is so rare - hope I’m not coming across as belligerent. You make great points. I’m considering using invaders much more than the other terms. I can see how that, if used en masse, would confuse the Liberals and sidestep any arguments they have as far as immigration whether legal -illegal.
Pretty brilliant if more Canadians used it. Takes an immigration issue and places it in more of an actual I don’t know, military position?
Fuck it. I’m in agreement. I’m going to use invaders from now on.
Indeed, and that’s exactly what they would do and why those terms were used, so that they would have an out, a way to pervert language and legal systems, which, in Canada, are labrynthine and perverse. However, I have seen the reactions of the majority of Canadians to accusations of racist or as you point out, discussions of a legal nature and the response is always the same - “don’t care, I’m a racist then, they’re illegal, all of them must go.”
There is one possibility though. Trudeau who is responsible for this mess, who caused it, is considered a top suspect in the murder of Barry and Honey Sherman, I believe very very rich people, billionaires, as well as rumoured to have appeared at the infamous Piggy Palace parties - if you don’t know, Robert Pickton had a Port Coquitlam Property where murder parties were held, where police were rumoured to show up and where Justin Trudeau lived a half mile down the road, as he skied at Whistler. And there are rumours he is on the P. Diddy tapes. Add to that the death jab, which he was involved in and you have crimes against humanity as well as serial murders. Some fraud with the SNC Lavalin case as well.
All of this together if true, plus participation with the Liberals would invalidate any bills laws or actions taken by him and his government. This is why I call them illegals. As well, they are not here to assimilate. They are here to take over. There are videos where they describe this and that is evidence that they are, in fact, foreign invaders and thus, illegal.
Any rhetoric the Liberals use, or the Conservatives, is just that and would not stand in a court of law without that court also being corrupt. And one more thing: America has the right to come up here and arrest and extradite, so if Trudeau is on the P. Diddy tapes, then that is just extra.
Your depiction of how the Liberals would react, how they would talk, is spot on, that’s exactly the failed strategy they would use. So would the Conservatives if they were in the hot seat.
Missed you John. Great read brother. I was just commenting the other day I think Europe is ready for the collaboration. We stand on the verge of a breakthrough. A renaissance if you will.
Of all the pitfalls you mentioned none are more troubling than this game of nuclear chicken. This time Putin is just a proxy. The real brinksmanship is between Trump and the demons that walk among us. He may have to capitulate to a degree. It might explain the Gaetz/Bondi situation. It’s hard to say really.
Its frightening what I see behavior-wise. I don’t believe Putin has anymore lessons in him to teach. If we continue to escalate after this point (lob some ATACMS at a NPP for example) I’m afraid it’s going to get very ugly.
God Bless Everyone!!
The outgoing American regime clearly wants to escalate things with Russia dramatically. Whether Russia falls for it is another question. We shall see.
It’s not that I think Putin would fall for it. I’m sure he knows just about better than anyone what the vile creatures are up to. My concern is they may paint him into a corner where a heavy response is the only choice. Best example is them using ATACMS to blow apart a Nuclear Power Plant. That’s unforgivable and even if Russia successfully shoots them down it’s still quite a conundrum to be in.
On the other hand it’s really hard for me to believe they all want to die. And there’s a good chance that’s the next step. I was never in the military or police but I did participate in a quite a bit of violence in bar fights and street brawls. It’s always the same. Once you know it’s going to erupt you skip all the dialogue and intermediate escalations and get right down to biz. Incapacitate the enemy before he does you.
However, There’s a lot of policy shapers in the West who don’t seem to have the first clue what violence even really means. These young ladies in high level think tanks come to mind. It’s extremely dangerous IMHO.
Involvement in geopolitics should require having been punched in the face as a child as a basic prerequisite. And having punched someone else in the face. If you don't have that experience you lack the basic emotional circuitry to properly process conflict, which leads to miscalculation.
Zero tolerance policies for violence have ruined our foreign policy establishment.
I actually have a simple program for world peace posted at my blog and it would work 100%. No wars would ever happen again.
Amen to that sir!! Something I have advocated for many times!
It doesn’t have to be Russian missile as a response. A sunken carrier in the Dead Sea can be more effective because unexpected while rockets over Europe is expected. We’re on the global board now and this is how the Enemy see it.
It's not that "they" want to die that's the problem; it's that "they" don't want to die and don't accept death coming for them as it does for all.
What worth their money, power and elite-status and self-image, before the gentle caress of Elle*, and before you find yourself either treading Bifrost or the Helway?
That realisation is part of why they act so rash one second, so mule-headed the other, and so seemingly irrational - they cannot escape death, yet they try frantically to do so any way they can. Doing anything just might work, is the feeling driving them.
And yes, that behaviour very much come from them never ever having been in at the sharp end.Witness the ridiculous "self-defence"-laws of most western nations for proof.
What are you like 5 years old? Lol you have me laughing now.
Listen Eugine, rather it be directly or indirectly you are marching us to the grave. The people playing the fife you dance have no business with you. You will never be one of them. They are elites who’s system is collapsing right before their eyes. They were so close to ensnaring humanity into it forever. This has driven them mad. Most don’t even know what they are doing (the ones I call little girls). Some, no doubt do. They would rather die and take the world with them as opposed to losing the concentration of their power.
Control of the money supply is the root of their power. It’s enforced by our military. It’s why we have hundreds of bases around the world.
Ok am done with you Eugine. Now fly away, fly fly fly
You are unthinkingly repeating warmed over decades old leftist propaganda while thinking yourself free.
It's really pathetic in a way.
Putin has been blustering the entire war, ignore him.
I am not so certain you can say such a thing with absolute confidence. Unfortunately the subject is not rather or not he will finally withhold shipments of Russian vodka. If things break the wrong way we are all doomed. It’s the sort of thinking you describe that has gotten us here.
Remember there are no do overs once this starts. Now I must ask you if you read what me and John were discussing? Have you ever been in any violent confrontations Eugine? Have you ever had your skull bashed in? Bleed out from shrapnel wounds lately lol?
Anyone encouraging that this war continue should experience some of that joy.
By your logic we're obliged to give any nuclear power anything it wants.
Better yet, just preemptively surrender to any would-be invader.
Go volunteer to fight it. Wtf would you say if Russia or China put missiles aimed at us on their military bases in Mexico. As of today neither nation has any bases so this is all hypothetical. If you can’t see the hypocrisy in that it’s because your paid filthy lying NAFO troll.
Your type drives me to a whole other level. If only there way to spot you. I shall make it my mission to do just that after the nukes bring down the grid. That’s where this is going because little girls like you think it’s fun to play with matches.
> Go volunteer to fight it.
Don't worry, freeloaders like yourself will be dealt with, one way or another.
I sure hope so. Welcome to the pretext of Armageddon Eugine. I hereby sentence you to watch Eugine. When some country also run by little girls like France gets vaporized I hope you are not there or anywhere close to ground zero.
We will revisit this if that should occur IF we even have comms. I seriously doubt we will. But don’t worry Eugine, I will be thinking of you. 🙂
> He may have to capitulate to a degree.
Bad choice of words. "Capitulation" is total surrender. It can't be done to a degree, it's by it's very nature complete.
I worry most for the UK's future, especially with prick-in-chief Starmer captaining the ship. He's such a smarmy tosser. Still, there may yet be hope: perhaps if other European populist forces can do their part in putting Starmer in place - and the boomers can let go of their nonsense - Great Britain may well be saved. Or, at least, kept from ruin until a real leader can take over again.
Farage or some other Reform candidate could do it in five years, but it remains to be seen whether any of them really have the stones.
Stiff upper lip, chums.
The boomers, unfortunately, will never change. I'm more sanguine about the possibility of converting young women to sane politics.
They got theirs, eh? They’re so insufferable about it, though. I never had the disdain for boomers that others so evidently have until I asked them about the future and they had little more to say than “bootstraps” in the face of a vastly disparate, challenging, and—at times—unworkable world driven by a relentless distraction economy.
Oh well, I suppose. I agree with you about young women: it’s only a matter of time until they change their tune, I think; the future is not about girl bosses or woke nonsense. It’s about a return to truly transcendent masculine and feminine virtues in the greatest sense.
Every single time I've talked about the professional difficulties caused by DEI policies with boomers, they almost invariably say something like, “Well, but surely you can understand, it's necessary to correct historical injustices.”
To which I tell them, “You've got yours so fuck me, right? Hey you're a really good person though, correcting historical injustices to no cost to yourself.”
Every time immigration comes up, they say, “Well someone needs to pay for the pensions!”
To which I tell them, “You were too busy having fun to have kids, so now we don't get to have a civilization?”
Boomer here and I would never say that.
Hence "almost invariably". There are exceptions, naturally.
The boomers aged out of child bearing decades ago so that problem is to be found elsewhere. Seems to be Gen X as there's been a blip up among Millennials. Still less than replacement. When we were in the fertile years, we reproduced at approximately replacement levels. Every generation since 1800 has had a lower fertility rate than the preceding one except the Greatest Generation that produced the Boomers.
This is US data. I would guess for Canada, the point of inflection is when the Frogs got the pill.
Ditto.
"It’s about a return to truly transcendent masculine and feminine virtues in the greatest sense"
Yup.
“If it’s on the telly, then it must be true!” They fell for the whole pop culture hook, worm, and line
Forget Farage. He has been cornered at several talks and has very clearly distanced himself from anything you are imagining. While patriotic, he has made his peace with multicultural Britain. Many have, although they are a minority.
Farage is definitely not the man the hour calls for.
but GB is already saved. you brexited EU! Success the elite lost! Or not at all...
The elite didn't want Brexit. The vote was a considerable inconvenience for them. Naturally however, they adapted, and screwed it up.
This illustrates the greatest weakness of populism, which is that the people have a tendency to think that a victory at the polls is decisive, and then to go back to their lives, whereas the elites understand that politics never ends.