It was in a book by Clay Martin called, “Barbarian Spirit.” I have high regard for both you and Clay. Read his book with an open mind… when you finish, you will ask yourself, “What did I just read?” Recommend reading his “Wrath of Wendigo” first, if possible.
It was in a book by Clay Martin called, “Barbarian Spirit.” I have high regard for both you and Clay. Read his book with an open mind… when you finish, you will ask yourself, “What did I just read?” Recommend reading his “Wrath of Wendigo” first, if possible.
BTW, that quote and his book, have made me rethink everything I’ve seen from from parents in defense of their children from the homosexual and transgender groomers, and the illegal immigration enablers. If we don’t protect our children, from obvious and known depravity, what sort of men are we?
But the point about the "grooming gangs" was that they preyed on girls in care who had no functioning family ties. Both the police and social workers ignored their plight because they were the children of the lowest of the working class and often drug addicts.
No, not because they were white. That is a very American perception. The parents of these girls were mostly from mining villages in South and West Yorkshire, where drug addiction was rife after the closing of the mines. Social work departments took children from the worst affected families and placed them in care homes. It was these care homes that were targeted by the gangs. Girls were not taken off the streets nor from outside ordinary schools. The gangs knew that the girls in the homes were vulnerable and that no one in authority would protect or even care about the fate of the girls.
As for "other" groups, the mining villages were tight, homogeneous societies. A few Bangladeshis might have run Indian restaurants, but that would be about all. Mining was not an industry that attracted immigrants.
You're making excuses to avoid acknowledging the obvious, but don't let me stop you from patting yourself on the back for what a good little boy you are.
I’m not American, and the notion that Muslims would sexually predate on the kaffir is hardly an American idea. It is, in fact, a core element of their faith.
Some old Pakistani saying that he did it because the Holy Koran said it was OK to rape 12-year-olds is about as believable as the police saying that they didn't intervene because they were afraid of being called racist.
It was in a book by Clay Martin called, “Barbarian Spirit.” I have high regard for both you and Clay. Read his book with an open mind… when you finish, you will ask yourself, “What did I just read?” Recommend reading his “Wrath of Wendigo” first, if possible.
BTW, that quote and his book, have made me rethink everything I’ve seen from from parents in defense of their children from the homosexual and transgender groomers, and the illegal immigration enablers. If we don’t protect our children, from obvious and known depravity, what sort of men are we?
But the point about the "grooming gangs" was that they preyed on girls in care who had no functioning family ties. Both the police and social workers ignored their plight because they were the children of the lowest of the working class and often drug addicts.
And, crucially, because they were White. If they'd been lower class girls of any other group the authorities would not have turned a blind eye.
As to drug addicts: yes, and the rape gangs made them that way.
Not the parents.
Stop blaming the victims.
No, not because they were white. That is a very American perception. The parents of these girls were mostly from mining villages in South and West Yorkshire, where drug addiction was rife after the closing of the mines. Social work departments took children from the worst affected families and placed them in care homes. It was these care homes that were targeted by the gangs. Girls were not taken off the streets nor from outside ordinary schools. The gangs knew that the girls in the homes were vulnerable and that no one in authority would protect or even care about the fate of the girls.
As for "other" groups, the mining villages were tight, homogeneous societies. A few Bangladeshis might have run Indian restaurants, but that would be about all. Mining was not an industry that attracted immigrants.
You're making excuses to avoid acknowledging the obvious, but don't let me stop you from patting yourself on the back for what a good little boy you are.
All I can say is that Americans have some strange foreign ideas.
I’m not American, and the notion that Muslims would sexually predate on the kaffir is hardly an American idea. It is, in fact, a core element of their faith.
So the fact the victims were known to be most in the vulnerable group doesn't come into it?
At what point did anyone say that it didn’t?
Naturally class played a role.
So did race.
So did the fact that, for example, they were female.
So did geographical proximity.
Many factors came into it.
Yet you seem determined to deny one of them.
Some old Pakistani saying that he did it because the Holy Koran said it was OK to rape 12-year-olds is about as believable as the police saying that they didn't intervene because they were afraid of being called racist.
not good men is the sort
Wrath of the Wendigo is fantastic. Part novel, part historical speculation, part manual.