2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Wise of you to put a disclaimer on the spicy content. But yea, I don't think this will end well. The Regime will keep on doubling down, and the people are getting fed up with anarcho-tyranny. The Brits have lived through a downward spiral for the past 25 years, and with Brexit being sabotaged and more invaders pouring in than ever, the realization is setting in that it's never going to get better, life will keep getting worse, more stabbings/rapes/murders/dispossession, unless they take decisive action. A population with no recourse and little to lose is exactly how you get open revolts.

Curtis Yarvin also discussed the possibility of royal intervention, which as you said would be a miracle, in more ways than one: its likelihood, and its potential as an ace-in-the-hole.

Also, I get the joke of photoshopping Queer Starmer onto Stalin or other dictators, but it has an uncanny effect due to his weak, pathetic physiognomy, which as always, never lies. Stalin may have gotten a bit carried away, but at least he was a mighty leader who took on the brunt of the Third Reich's war machine and won. There's no way in hell these pitiful stooges could've survived in times of warlords and iron-fisted dictators, they are entirely the product of effete decadence. Really, most Western leaders would be unrecognizable to the statesmen of the past, with the exception of Donald Trump of course. Other than the Orange Emperor, you have to search outside the Western world to find proper leadership, eg Putin & Xi Jinping.

But speaking of Trump, my country is looking forward to a very interesting November. There's no way to predict what happens, but whatever goes down, it will likely send shockwaves to the vassals and satrapies of the US, including britbongland, with unknown consequences.

Expand full comment

Starmer might not have Stalin’s strength of will, but he certainly aspires to Stalin’s ruthlessness.

Expand full comment